admin/Odoo-Modules
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

feat(plating): close 5 end-to-end automation gaps

Browse Source 
E2E test (quote → SO → MO → WOs → ship → invoice → payment) ran clean
but flagged five gaps where the operator was filling in data the
system already knew. Closes all five.

#1  SO CONFIRM → AUTO-CREATE DRAFT MO  (was a workflow blocker)
    bridge_mrp/sale_order.py: action_confirm() override + new
    _fp_auto_create_mo helper. Resolves the manufactured product from
    the configurator's part-catalog → coating-config → FP-WIDGET
    fallback; resolves the recipe from coating_config.recipe_id →
    part_catalog.recipe_id → first installed recipe. Idempotent:
    skips if any MO already exists for the SO. Errors are caught and
    chatter-posted so SO confirm never fails because of an MO glitch.

#2  QUOTE PO → client_order_ref ON SO  (one-line fix)
    configurator/fp_quote_configurator.py: action_create_quotation
    now copies po_number_preliminary into Odoo's standard
    client_order_ref alongside the existing custom x_fc_po_number.
    Portal pages, native reports, and integrations all read the
    standard field; no reason both shouldn't carry the same PO#.

#3  MO DONE → AUTO-RENDER CoC + THICKNESS PDFs
    bridge_mrp/mrp_production.py button_mark_done now calls a new
    _fp_generate_cert_pdf helper after creating each fp.certificate.
    Renders fusion_plating_reports.action_report_coc to PDF, stores
    as ir.attachment, links to cert.attachment_id, AND cross-links
    to portal_job.coc_attachment_id + delivery.coc_attachment_id so
    the customer portal and the shipping email both find it without
    an extra step. Thickness report falls back to the CoC layout
    (which embeds thickness data) until a dedicated report ships.
    Errors are logged but never block MO completion.

#4  RECEIVING received_qty PREFILL
    receiving/fp_receiving.py: create() prefills received_qty from
    expected_qty on draft. Operator only types when the count is
    wrong (the rare case). Field carrier_tracking already exists,
    so #4's 'no inbound tracking field' from the gap report turned
    out to be a false alarm.

#5  DELIVERY scheduled_date + driver PREFILL
    bridge_mrp/mrp_production.py: new _fp_build_delivery_vals
    helper sets scheduled_date from the portal job's target_ship_date
    (or now+2 business days as a sane fallback) and auto-picks
    assigned_driver_id from clocked-in employees tagged is_driver
    (falls back to any active driver if the shift is empty). The
    outbound tracking_ref deliberately stays empty — that's the
    carrier's number, paste it in once UPS/FedEx accepts the package.

Module bumps: configurator 19.0.5.0.0, bridge_mrp 19.0.5.0.0,
receiving 19.0.2.0.0.

Verified on entech: re-ran the E2E test against a fresh quote.
Quote → SO populated client_order_ref, SO confirm auto-created MO,
receiving prefilled received_qty=50, MO done generated CERT-00018.pdf
and linked it to portal job + delivery, delivery's scheduled_date
prefilled to 2026-04-29, full pipeline ended with portal job state
'complete'. The remaining 'gaps' in the static report are script
artefacts (e.g. it flags 'no inbound tracking field' but the field
exists; flags 'no driver auto-pick' but the demo data has zero
drivers tagged is_driver=True).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
gsinghpal
2026-04-19 00:46:30 -04:00
parent b288b9614b
commit 167c423bf5
7 changed files with 230 additions and 26 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fusion_plating/fusion_plating_receiving/__manifest__.py
View File

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
{
'name': 'Fusion Plating — Receiving & Inspection',
'version': '19.0.1.0.0',
'version': '19.0.2.0.0',
'category': 'Manufacturing/Plating',
'summary': 'Parts receiving, inspection, damage logging, and manufacturing gate.',
'description': """

5
fusion_plating/fusion_plating_receiving/models/fp_receiving.py
View File

@@ -88,6 +88,11 @@ class FpReceiving(models.Model):
for vals in vals_list:
if vals.get('name', 'New') == 'New':
vals['name'] = self.env['ir.sequence'].next_by_code('fp.receiving') or 'New'
# Prefill received_qty from expected_qty so the operator only
# types when the count is wrong (the common case is "all
# arrived"). Saves a step on every routine receipt.
if vals.get('expected_qty') and not vals.get('received_qty'):
vals['received_qty'] = vals['expected_qty']
return super().create(vals_list)
# -------------------------------------------------------------------------