From 4a304e02f307229d06e930e86b5fb43d8aae811f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: gsinghpal Date: Fri, 22 May 2026 22:47:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] fix(fusion_plating_jobs): restore quick_look_qty + instruction_attachment_ids MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Same regression as the previous commit — b0070afc removed all 4 quick_look related fields, my first fix only caught 2 of them. Restoring the remaining 2 so the quick-look view fully validates. --- .../fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/fusion_plating/fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py b/fusion_plating/fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py index e23a655a..fccaa0ea 100644 --- a/fusion_plating/fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py +++ b/fusion_plating/fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py @@ -1216,6 +1216,17 @@ class FpJobStep(models.Model): related='job_id.part_catalog_id', readonly=True, ) + quick_look_qty = fields.Float( + string='Order Qty', + related='job_id.qty', + readonly=True, + ) + quick_look_instruction_attachment_ids = fields.Many2many( + 'ir.attachment', + string='Instruction Images', + related='recipe_node_id.instruction_attachment_ids', + readonly=True, + ) quick_look_instructions = fields.Html( string='Operator Instructions', related='recipe_node_id.description',