fix(nexa_coa_setup): clean GL codes — 119100/119900->115200/115900, 511105->511100
Three odd code positions that were chosen to dodge l10n_ca collisions are
now cleaned up:
- Due From Shareholder 119100 -> 115200 (115xxx is where receivables belong)
- Due From Associated Corps 119900 -> 115900
- Cloud Infrastructure 511105 -> 511100 (legacy 'Inside Purchases'
renamed to 511100.OLD)
Applied to prod via scripts/fix_gl_codes.py (now committed).
Module XML updated: <field name='code'> values match new codes; XMLIDs
(acct_119100, acct_119900, acct_511105) preserved so existing
ir.model.data rows on prod still map to the right records.
pre_init_hook augmented with _L10N_CA_FORCE_CLEAR_CODES set so a fresh
install on a new DB also force-clears 511100 (which would otherwise be
blocked by the postings-exist guard).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,14 +4,12 @@ import logging
|
||||
_logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# l10n_ca account codes that collide with the Nexa CoA design and that
|
||||
# l10n_ca pre-loads with 'income_other'/'expense'/etc. types we don't want.
|
||||
# Each of these is checked at pre_init: if it has zero postings we suffix
|
||||
# its code with '.OLD' and archive it so our XML can claim the code.
|
||||
# Codes with postings are LEFT ALONE — we renumbered the Nexa code instead
|
||||
# (115100 stays as l10n_ca 'Customers Account' AR; Nexa shareholder receivable
|
||||
# moved to 119100. 511100 stays as l10n_ca 'Inside Purchases'; Nexa Cloud
|
||||
# Infrastructure moved to 511105).
|
||||
# l10n_ca account codes that collide with the Nexa CoA design. Each is
|
||||
# checked at pre_init: if it has zero postings we suffix its code with
|
||||
# '.OLD' and archive it so our XML can claim the code.
|
||||
# Codes with postings are LEFT ALONE — we renumbered the Nexa account.
|
||||
# Currently 115100 stays as l10n_ca 'Customers Account' (240 postings, AR
|
||||
# control) — Nexa shareholder receivable sits at 115200 instead.
|
||||
_L10N_CA_COLLISION_CODES = [
|
||||
"118100", "118200", "118300",
|
||||
"213100", "214100",
|
||||
@@ -19,12 +17,18 @@ _L10N_CA_COLLISION_CODES = [
|
||||
"311100", "311200", "311300",
|
||||
"411100", "411200", "411300",
|
||||
"413100", "413200", "413300",
|
||||
"511110", "511120", "511130", "511140", "511200", "511210",
|
||||
"511100", "511110", "511120", "511130", "511140", "511200", "511210",
|
||||
"512100", "512110", "512200",
|
||||
"611100", "611200", "611300",
|
||||
"612100", "612200",
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Codes that MUST be cleared even if they have postings (force-suffix to .OLD).
|
||||
# Use sparingly — historical reports lose the original name. Only for codes
|
||||
# where the Nexa account at that code is the canonical one going forward and
|
||||
# any prior posting is a misclassification the user will re-class later.
|
||||
_L10N_CA_FORCE_CLEAR_CODES = {"511100"}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def pre_init_hook(env):
|
||||
"""Run BEFORE XML data is loaded. Clear l10n_ca account codes that would
|
||||
@@ -47,7 +51,8 @@ def _clear_l10n_ca_collisions(env):
|
||||
not_found += 1
|
||||
continue
|
||||
usage = env["account.move.line"].search_count([("account_id", "=", acc.id)])
|
||||
if usage > 0:
|
||||
force = code in _L10N_CA_FORCE_CLEAR_CODES
|
||||
if usage > 0 and not force:
|
||||
_logger.info(
|
||||
"nexa_coa_setup: keeping l10n_ca account %s (%s) — %d postings exist",
|
||||
code, acc.name, usage,
|
||||
@@ -64,6 +69,11 @@ def _clear_l10n_ca_collisions(env):
|
||||
"active": False,
|
||||
})
|
||||
cleared += 1
|
||||
if force and usage > 0:
|
||||
_logger.info(
|
||||
"nexa_coa_setup: force-cleared %s despite %d postings (in FORCE_CLEAR set)",
|
||||
code, usage,
|
||||
)
|
||||
_logger.info(
|
||||
"nexa_coa_setup: collision sweep — cleared %d, kept-with-postings %d, not-found %d",
|
||||
cleared, kept_with_postings, not_found,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user