The _compute_display_name method on fusion.plating.customer.spec was
missing its @api.depends decorator. Without it, Odoo doesn't know
when to fire the compute, so display_name stayed NULL on:
- All seeded specs (created via XML data import)
- Any spec created later (the field was never recomputed)
Symptom: Specification dropdown on the SO line showed "Unnamed" for
every option, making spec selection useless.
Fix:
- @api.depends('code', 'revision', 'name') on _compute_display_name
- Imported `api` (was only `fields, models`)
Companion entech-side action: forced recompute on the 15 existing
specs via `env.add_to_compute(specs._fields['display_name'], specs)`
so the stored column was backfilled. New specs created via UI will
trigger the compute automatically going forward.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Specifications menu (urgent — workflow blocker for estimators):
- Moved from Configuration → Quality & Documents (manager-only) up
to Plating → Quality (sequence 70). Now visible to estimator,
supervisor, and manager.
- Renamed "Customer Specs" → "Specifications" — the seeded library
includes industry standards (AMS, MIL, ASTM, BAC) not just
customer-private specs.
- Action display name updated: "Customer Specifications" → "Specifications".
- Added action.help HTML so the empty-state placeholder explains
the Specifications library purpose to first-time users.
- Old xmlid (menu_fp_config_customer_spec) preserved so existing
links / breadcrumbs / search references continue to resolve.
Other clarifying renames:
- Safety: "JHSC" / "JHSC Meetings" → "H&S Committee (JHSC)" /
"H&S Committee Meetings" — acronym was opaque to non-Canadian
H&S folks.
- Operations: "Move Log" → "Parts & Rack Move Log" — generic name
could be confused with chatter messages or stock moves.
- Configuration → Recipes & Steps: "Workflow States" →
"Job Workflow Stages" — generic name; clarifies these are job
state milestones (passed-stage tracking), not generic workflow.
- Compliance → General: child folder "Configuration" → "Reference
Data" — three levels of "Configuration" nesting (Plating>Config
vs Plating>Compliance>General>Config) was confusing.
No model / data changes. Pure menu metadata.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reports updated to print Specification (with revision via display_name):
- report_fp_sale.xml — header sections show "SPECIFICATION" instead
of "COATING CONFIG", reads doc.x_fc_customer_spec_id (added on
sale.order via quality inherit, computed from line.customer_spec_id)
- report_fp_wo_sticker.xml — propagates _spec alongside _coating
- fusion_plating_reports/report_fp_job_traveller.xml — header row
now shows Specification (falls back to coating)
- fusion_plating_jobs/report_fp_job_traveller.xml — same fall-back
- fusion_plating_jobs/report_fp_job_sticker.xml — _spec added
sale.order.x_fc_customer_spec_id added as a stored compute on
sale.order (in quality) so reports can render order-level spec.
Mirrors the line's first spec; updates on line edit.
Tablet payload (shopfloor_controller.py):
- spec_label added to the job payload dict
- defensive 'customer_spec_id' in job._fields check (shopfloor doesn't
depend on quality — circular if added)
Portal: deferred (same circular-dep issue, more substantial UI rewrite
needed; Phase E backlog item).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Pricing:
- Quality inherit on fp.pricing.rule adds customer_spec_id + recipe_id
- Quality inherit on fp.quote.configurator adds customer_spec_id field
+ extends _find_matching_rule with priority chain:
spec (+8) > recipe (+6) > coating (+4) > material (+2) > cert (+1)
- View inherit surfaces both new pickers on the rule form
Quality points:
- fp.quality.point now has customer_spec_ids + recipe_ids M2M filters
- Matcher (_matches + _find_matching) accepts new args
- Hook overrides on SO confirm + job confirm/done + step finish
pass spec/recipe context through to the matcher
- View surfaces both new M2M widgets
Job:
- jobs/sale_order.py wires x_fc_customer_spec_id from SO line to
fp.job.customer_spec_id on action_confirm
Cert:
- Quality inherit on fp.certificate adds customer_spec_id field +
create() override auto-fills spec_reference from spec.code+revision
Resolution priority: explicit spec_reference > cert.customer_spec_id
> SO line spec (with print_on_cert) > legacy coating fallback
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Spec-side picker (x_fc_customer_spec_id / customer_spec_id) added on:
- sale.order.line (via quality inherit — onchange autofill, create()
fallback to part default, _prepare_invoice_line carry)
- account.move.line (via quality inherit — invoice rendering)
- fp.part.catalog (via quality inherit — x_fc_default_customer_spec_id)
- fp.direct.order.line (via quality inherit — wizard picker + autofill)
- fp.direct.order.wizard (action_create_order post-creates spec on SO line)
Thickness picker switched to fp.recipe.thickness (replaces coating-scoped):
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_id comodel + domain rewired to recipe
- account.move.line + fp.delivery same
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_id same
View inherits in quality add Specification picker next to legacy
Primary Treatment column on:
- SO form line tree
- part catalog Default Treatments block
- direct-order wizard line tree + drawer
Wizard files (fp.contract.review.client.email.wizard) pulled from
entech into the repo — they were ahead of the repo. Quality __init__
now imports wizards/.
Legacy x_fc_coating_config_id + treatment_ids remain visible during
transition; Phase E removes them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add fp.recipe.thickness model (replaces fp.coating.thickness, scoped to recipe root)
- Add spec metadata + bake-relief fields to fusion.plating.process.node (recipe root):
phosphorus_level, thickness_min/max/uom, thickness_option_ids,
requires_bake_relief + bake_window_hours/temperature/duration
- Add recipe_ids M2M + print_on_cert to fusion.plating.customer.spec
- Add applicable_spec_ids reverse M2M as inherit in fusion_plating_quality
(avoids circular dep — core can't reference customer.spec which lives in quality)
- Surface new fields on recipe form ("Specification & Bake" notebook page)
- Surface recipe linkage on customer spec form
Pure additive. Foundation for Phases B-E.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four message_post calls were passing strings with HTML tags as
plain `body=_(...)` instead of `body=Markup(_(...))`. Odoo escapes
non-Markup strings, so the chatter rendered "<b>QA Review failed</b>"
as literal text instead of bolding it.
Original bug surfaced via the Contract Review (QA-005) flow:
body: "<b>QA Review failed</b> by Garry Singh. Awaiting
client information.<br/><b>Reason:</b><br/>
<div data-oe-version=\"2.0\">Need to get updated
drawing...</div>"
Audit scan turned up three more identical patterns:
fusion_plating/models/fp_parent_numbered_mixin.py:118
"Issued <strong>%s</strong> to ..."
fusion_plating_jobs/models/sale_order.py:282
"Confirmed quote <strong>%s</strong> as <strong>%s</strong>."
fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_contract_review.py:430
"<b>QA Review failed</b> by ... <b>Reason:</b><br/>%(reason)s"
fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_contract_review.py:524
"<b>QA Review completed</b> by ... <b>Special Instructions
captured:</b><br/>%(notes)s"
Fixes:
- Wrapped each body=_(...) with Markup(_(...)) using the
Markup(template) % values pattern (auto-escapes the substituted
values; user-supplied free text stays safe).
- For Html-field substitutions (qa_failure_reason,
special_instructions), explicitly wrapped the value in Markup()
so already-formatted HTML editor content (with data-oe-version="2.0"
wrapper divs) flows through without being re-escaped.
- Added `from markupsafe import Markup` to the two files that
didn't already import it (mixin + contract_review).
Drift cleanup: pulled the 180-line newer fp_contract_review.py
from entech to the local repo (added action_qa_review_failed,
action_open_client_email_wizard, action_view_client_emails,
action_complete_after_info, awaiting_info state, qa_failure_reason
+ special_instructions Html fields, etc. that had been edited on
entech without being committed).
Tested by re-posting via odoo shell on review 10: body now stores
"<b>QA Review failed</b>..." with literal HTML tags instead of
the double-escaped "<b>..." entities. Old chatter records
with the bad escape stay as-is in the audit trail.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Hold derives parent via job_id.sale_order_id; RMA via sale_order_id
directly — both get HOLD-<parent> / RMA-<parent> names. NCR and CAPA
have no SO link in core, so they fall back to their legacy sequences
(NCR/YYYY/NNN, CAPA/YYYY/NNN); future modules can override the
_fp_parent_sale_order hook to enable parent naming.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two bugs fixed in one drop, both targeting the contract review (QA-005)
enforcement gap reported on entech.
## Bug 1 — WO step routed to wrong wizard
Symptom: clicking Finish & Next or Record on a Contract Review step in
WH/JOB/00339 opened the generic measurement wizard with three fake
prompts (Reviewer Initials / Date Reviewed / QA-005 Approved). No path
to the actual QA-005 form from the work order.
Root cause: action_finish_and_advance + action_open_input_wizard had no
branch for recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'. The step.kind
mapping collapses contract_review -> 'other' so kind-based detection
wouldn't have worked either; gate has to live at the recipe-node layer.
Fix in fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py (v19.0.8.14.6):
- action_finish_and_advance:329 calls _fp_contract_review_redirect
before the input-wizard branch
- action_open_input_wizard:844 same gate, keeps Record button consistent
- _fp_contract_review_redirect:866 (new) returns the part's
action_start_contract_review() unless review.state in
(complete, dismissed) — gate clears so the step can finish after
the operator signs QA-005.
## Bug 2 — Part create did not enforce contract review
Symptom: spec called for a banner-only UX. User wanted true automatic
enforcement on first part creation under an enforced customer.
Fix in fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_part_catalog.py (v19.0.4.10.0):
- @api.model_create_multi def create() override
- _fp_enforce_contract_review_on_create() helper auto-stages the
fp.contract.review record AND surfaces three prominent reminders:
1. Sticky bus.bus warning toast (top-right, doesn't auto-dismiss)
2. mail.activity (To Do) on the part for the current user
3. Smart button on the part form lights up (review now exists)
- Idempotent: skips parts that already carry a review id
- Soft-fails: bus or activity outage doesn't block part creation
- create()-only — write/update flows never re-trigger
Sub 4's existing info banner stays as a fourth surface.
## Tests
- fusion_plating_jobs/tests/test_fp_job_extensions.py:
+TestContractReviewStepRouting (5 tests covering both routing methods,
the complete/dismissed gate-clear, and non-CR step regression)
- fusion_plating_quality/tests/test_part_catalog_contract_review_enforcement.py
(NEW): 9 tests covering auto-create, batch create, idempotency,
activity surface, bus surface, write-must-not-retrigger, soft-fail.
- docs/superpowers/tests/2026-04-22-sub4-smoke.py: flipped the
"no review yet" assertion to "review auto-created" to match new
behavior. Sign-flow assertions unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Checklist group used col=\"4\" which stretched each label+field
pair across a quarter of the sheet, producing a big empty gap
between the two columns. Replaced with the idiomatic Odoo two-
nested-group pattern so each column hugs its labels, removing the
dead space. Same fix applied to Section 3.0 and to the Outcome
blocks on both sections.
fusion_plating_quality → 19.0.2.3.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds a "Contract Review" stat button to fp.part.catalog's button box.
Shows a coloured state badge (green=complete, blue=manager_review,
yellow=assistant_review, muted=dismissed, em-dash when none). Click
routes through action_start_contract_review so it opens the existing
review or lazy-creates one — same behaviour as the banner / tab.
fusion_plating_quality → 19.0.2.2.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- New bulk-toggle actions on fp.contract.review flip all 10 checklist
items in Section 2.0 (and all 11 in Section 3.0) in one click.
Rendered as "Check All" / "Clear All" buttons above each checklist.
User can still tick boxes individually. Buttons hide once the
section is signed (locked).
- Fix QA-005 PDF: replaced `to_text(...)` (not in QWeb context) with
`image_data_uri(...)` for the company logo embed. PDF now renders
with the full colour ENTECH logo (render size 103 KB).
- Smoke test extended: 5 new assertions covering bulk-toggle on/off
and locked-section guard. 17/17 pass on entech.
fusion_plating_quality → 19.0.2.1.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per-part contract review record (fp.contract.review) gated by a
customer-level toggle, signed in two sections (QA Assistant → QA
Manager), settings-based signer rosters (no new res.groups), banner on
the part form that auto-dismisses once the first MO for the part hits
confirmed. QA-005 Rev. 0 paper form reproduced 1:1 in a QWeb PDF.
Never blocks MO/SO/WO — review is purely an audit artefact.
Smoke test run on entech: 12 assertions pass including the 25-cell
risk matrix parity with the paper form and 22 KB PDF render.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
**1. Manager Desk: WO no longer jumps to "In Progress" on partial setup**
User-reported bug: when the manager picked a worker, the WO immediately
left the "Unassigned" column even though the bath/tank (or oven, rack,
masking material) wasn't set yet. Worker would see a half-set job in
their queue and couldn't start it.
Fix:
- New compute `mrp.workorder.x_fc_is_release_ready` — True only when
every field button_start would block on is filled in.
- Companion `x_fc_missing_for_release` — comma-list of what's still
missing (used by the UI as a hint chip).
- Manager controller swaps the column filter from
`assigned_user_id == False` to `is_release_ready == False`.
- A WO stays in "Setup Pending" (formerly Unassigned) until BOTH
worker + per-kind equipment are set; only then does it move to
"In Progress".
**Manager Desk template + SCSS**
The user also said "the manager doesn't know what task they're
assigning". WO row now shows:
• Colour-coded WO-kind badge (wet=blue, bake=red, mask=yellow,
rack=grey, inspect=green)
• Required-role icon + name
• Bath / oven / rack / masking-material chips (whatever's set)
• Yellow "Needs: ..." chip listing what's still missing
• Tank picker only shows for wet WOs (no point on a mask WO)
• Open-WO button to drill into the form for advanced edits
**2. Six enforcement gates patched (without breaking the workflow)**
Each gate fires AFTER the manager sets up the WO and the operator
hits Start/Finish — never on create — so the manager → worker → run
flow stays intact.
| # | Gate | Where |
|---|---|---|
| a | SO confirm requires `client_order_ref` (or x_fc_po_number) | sale_order.action_confirm |
| b | Cert issue requires thickness readings (when partner.x_fc_strict_thickness_required) | fp_certificate.action_issue |
| c | Delivery start_route requires assigned_driver_id | fp_delivery.action_start_route |
| d | Bath log create/save requires line_ids (no empty logs) | fp_bath_log create + @api.constrains |
| e | Quality hold: hold_reason + description now `required=True` | fp_quality_hold field schema |
| f | Receiving accept blocks qty mismatch (manager override allowed + logged) | fp_receiving.action_accept |
New partner flag `x_fc_strict_thickness_required` so commercial
customers don't get blocked but aerospace customers do.
**Verified** via `scripts/fp_enforcement_audit.py`: 18/22 ENFORCED
(2 "GAPS" + 2 "ERRs" are all test artifacts — admin bypass + NOT NULL
fires before my custom check; real gates are correct).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
**7a. NCR close gate** (fusion.plating.ncr.action_close)
Block close unless these are filled in:
• Description (what happened)
• Containment Actions (immediate response)
• Root Cause (why it happened)
• Disposition (use-as-is / rework / scrap / RTV decision)
A closed NCR without these is useless for AS9100 audits — it's
the entire point of an NCR to document what went wrong, why, and
how we responded. Empty-HTML strings like "<p><br></p>" are
detected as empty too.
**7b. CAPA close gate** (fusion.plating.capa.action_close)
Block close unless:
• Root Cause Analysis filled in
• Action Plan filled in
• Verification (date + verifier) recorded
• Effectiveness Notes filled when CAPA was marked Not Effective
AS9100 §10.2 / Nadcap require evidence of root-cause analysis,
the corrective/preventive action plan, AND that effectiveness
was verified before the loop is closed.
**8. Invoice ref defensive default** (account.move.create)
Auto-fills `ref` from the source SO's client_order_ref or
x_fc_po_number when the invoice is created with invoice_origin set
but no ref. Already populated on the SO confirm path; this catches
manually-created invoices that would otherwise miss it. Customer
AP teams reject invoices that don't quote their PO# back.
**9. Discharge sample close gate** (fusion.plating.discharge.sample.action_close)
Block close unless:
• Lab Report # set
• Results Received Date set
• At least one parameter reading on file
• Lab certificate/report attached
Without lab evidence the record fails any environmental compliance
audit — the whole point is to document the test was performed and
what the lab said.
**Simulator** (scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py)
Adds 4 new negative tests (Test 8-11), all wrapped in savepoints:
✓ Test 8 : NCR close without RC/containment/disposition → blocked
✓ Test 9 : CAPA close without analysis/plan/verification → blocked
✓ Test 10: Discharge sample close without lab evidence → blocked
✓ Test 11: Invoice ref auto-fills from SO.client_order_ref → asserted
**Final E2E**: 52 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL out of 54 checks.
Both remaining WARNs are expected (bake-window auto-create,
first-piece gate — coating-driven, this coating doesn't trigger them).
11 negative tests in total now, every gate fires when triggered.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two fixes from a single SO walkthrough screenshot:
**1. "Current stage" banner**
- Was placed `inside sheet` so it rendered at the BOTTOM of the form
where users miss it. Moved to `before form/header` (same xpath
pattern as the Account Hold banner) — now it's the first thing
visible above the SO header.
- Was still showing "Shipped — awaiting invoice" after the invoice
was posted because `_compute_workflow_stage` only advanced to
`complete` when shipped + ALL paid; an unpaid posted invoice left
the SO stuck on `shipped`. Added an `invoicing` branch: shipped +
has_posted_invoice → invoicing. Banner invisible-list now also
includes `invoicing` and `paid`, so the banner only shows for
in-progress steps.
**2. Chatter messages rendering raw HTML tags as text**
Odoo 19 escapes any string passed to `message_post(body=...)`
unless wrapped in `markupsafe.Markup`. We had ~10 places posting
HTML (`<a href>`, `<b>`, `<br/>`, `<code>`, `<pre>`) that all
showed up as `<a href=...>` literal text in the chatter.
Wrapped each one with `Markup(_(...))` so the tags render. Files
touched:
- fusion_plating_bridge_mrp/models/sale_order.py
(auto-MO failure code block, "Draft MO created" link,
"Job assigned to <b>" message)
- fusion_plating_bridge_mrp/models/mrp_production.py
("Recipe steps" pre/br block on each WO)
- fusion_plating_bridge_mrp/models/fp_proficiency.py
(operator promotion announcement)
- fusion_plating_configurator/models/fp_quote_configurator.py
(SO link, 3D model attached, drawing attached, save to catalog)
- fusion_plating_configurator/models/fp_part_catalog.py
(3D/drawing change tracking + propagation to linked quotes)
- fusion_plating_portal/models/fp_quote_request.py
(RFQ → SO link)
- fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_quality_hold.py
(hold status change)
- fusion_plating_shopfloor/controllers/manager_controller.py
(worker / tank / manager-takeover assignments)
Verified on entech: SO S00038 stage now reads `invoicing` (banner
hidden), and a freshly posted message shows `<a href>` and `<b>`
as actual link + bold instead of escaped text.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
