UI: secondary row buttons in the embedded step list are now icon-only
with tooltips (Pause / Complete 1 → Next / Record / Skip / Move…).
Saves ~70% horizontal space. "Finish & Next" stays text+icon as the
primary action.
Fix: removed the racking-inspection gate from button_finish. Racking
is now a recipe step (not a separate inspection workflow), so the
"Racking inspection for ... is Inspecting — must be Done" error no
longer fires. _fp_check_racking_inspection_complete() helper is
preserved for diagnostics but no longer called from the finish path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
User feedback: operators with small parts (e.g. valve bodies) batch
them through the whole recipe. The previous behavior — Finish & Next
raising "use Complete 1 → Next or Move..." when qty>1 — forced N
clicks for a workflow that's naturally one click.
Change: _fp_record_one_piece_auto_move now ALWAYS bulk-moves
qty_at_step parts to the next step in one move record, regardless of
whether the qty is seed-only (first / paperwork step) or real (parked
from an upstream move). Audit trail is preserved (one move row per
finish), operator gets one click.
Three buttons now map cleanly to the three workflows:
- Finish & Next: bulk all parts forward, finish, auto-start next
- Complete 1 -> Next: streaming flow, move 1 part, stay open
- Move...: explicit qty + destination wizard for partial batches
Verified end-to-end on entech: seed qty=6 + real-incoming qty=6 both
move forward in a single click each.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The qty gate I added refused Finish on steps where qty_at_step > 0,
to force operators to move parts forward first. But the first-step
seed in _compute_qty_at_step gives the earliest non-terminal step
a notional qty = job.qty — a UI hint, not actual parked parts.
Paperwork steps (Contract Review, Inspection-by-paperwork, etc.)
sit on that seed, and the gate was blocking Finish with a misleading
error.
Fixes:
- button_finish gate now checks for REAL incoming moves before
refusing. Seed-only qty (no incoming_move_ids filtered to non-
self-loop) is exempt.
- _fp_record_one_piece_auto_move detects seed-only qty and bulk-
moves ALL parts in one shot to the downstream step. Correct for
paperwork / first steps where parts don't physically wait
per-piece — one click finishes the paperwork and pushes the whole
batch forward.
For steps with REAL incoming moves (parts actually moved here via
a Move record), the original gate semantics still apply: qty == 1
auto-moves one part; qty > 1 raises with the "use Complete 1 → Next
or Move…" message.
Verified on entech: Contract Review with seed qty=6 now finishes
cleanly, bulk-moving all 6 parts to the next step in one move.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two coupled fixes so the workflow bar shows "In Progress" when work
is actually underway, even on recipes without kind tagging:
B. Auto-promote fp.job.state on first step start.
fp.job.step.write hook detects step transitions to in_progress
and promotes parent job state from 'confirmed' → 'in_progress'.
Without this, fp.job.state never reached 'in_progress' anywhere
in the codebase, so the trigger_on_job_state='in_progress'
path was dead code.
C. Smarter trigger_first_step_started for untagged recipes.
For tagged recipes (any step has kind in wet/bake/mask/rack),
keep the strict kind-based check. For untagged recipes (all
steps kind='other' or similar), fall back to "any step in
in_progress/paused/done" so the milestone fires regardless of
recipe authoring quality.
Verified end-to-end on entech with untagged steps:
- confirmed → in_progress when first step starts
- workflow bar tracks at in_progress through the work
- workflow bar advances to done when all steps done/skipped
Recipe authoring still encouraged for full Received / Inspected
intermediate states (those keep their default_kind triggers).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
When a supervisor edits a timelog's date_started/date_finished (or
deletes a stale timelog), the parent step's "Actual Min" column
was showing stale data — duration_actual is a regular Float set
once by button_finish.
Adds:
- fp.job.step._fp_resum_duration_actual: quiet helper that re-sums
duration_actual from time_log_ids.duration_minutes. Skip no-op
updates so write traffic is minimised.
- fp.job.step.timelog.create/write/unlink hooks: call the helper
on the affected parent step(s) so duration_actual stays
consistent. Write hook only fires when date_started/date_finished/
step_id changed (notes edits skip resync). step_id reassignment
resyncs both old and new parent.
- Existing action_recompute_duration_from_timelogs (manual button)
still posts a chatter entry for audit-trail use cases.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three coupled shop-floor corrections:
- fp.job._compute_display_name: renders "Work Order # 00011" in
form header, breadcrumbs, M2O dropdowns, and error messages.
DB name stays as WH/JOB/00011 - existing chatter/cert/delivery
references unchanged.
- fp.job.step.button_finish: refuses if qty_at_step > 0 AND a
downstream pending/ready step exists. Last runnable step is
exempt (parts complete in place). Manager bypass via
fp_skip_qty_gate=True context key.
- fp.job.step.action_complete_one_to_next: new per-row button
"Complete 1 -> Next" for streaming flow (large parts going
one-by-one). Records move(qty=1) to next step; if drain takes
qty_at_step to 0, auto-finishes source + auto-starts destination
via existing action_finish_and_advance.
- fp.job.step._fp_record_one_piece_auto_move: auto-move shim
wired into action_finish_and_advance. qty=1 + downstream =>
silently record move(1). qty>1 + downstream => raise pointing
at Complete 1 -> Next. Last step always allowed.
- 16 new TestQtyGate tests covering gate / shim / auto-finish /
last-step exemption / display rename / Move wizard zero-qty.
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-step-qty-gate-and-display-rename-design.md
Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-12-step-qty-gate-and-display-rename.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
User reproduced on WH/JOB/00342: clicked Start on Incoming Inspection
while Contract Review was still in_progress. Sub 13 should have raised
UserError. It didn't. Both steps ended up in_progress.
Investigation:
$ grep "def button_start" fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py
88: def button_start(self): ← Sub 13 gate code
876: def button_start(self): ← Policy B + Sub 8 (older)
Two definitions of the same method in the same class. Python uses the
SECOND. My Sub 13 gate at line 88 was dead code from the moment it
landed. WH/JOB/00342's Contract Review and Incoming Inspection both
ran in_progress because the live button_start (line 876) only did
Policy B Contract Review auto-open and Sub 8 Racking auto-open — no
predecessor check.
Fix:
* Removed the duplicate button_start at line 88 (left a marker
comment so the next person doesn't redo this footgun)
* Merged the Sub 13 predecessor gate AND the receiving soft check
into the line-876 button_start so all four behaviours run from
one method:
1. Predecessor gate (raise UserError if blocking)
2. Contract Review auto-open (route to QA-005)
3. Racking auto-open (route to inspection)
4. super().button_start() + receiving check + serial promotion
Helpers _fp_should_block_predecessors / can_start / _compute_can_start
preserved (used by view + Move wizard too).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
User feedback on WH/JOB/00341 (S00279 retest): clicking Start on
the Contract Review step changed state to in_progress but didn't
take them to QA-005. They had to then click Finish & Next twice
to land on the form — confusing flow.
Better UX: when an operator clicks Start on a step where
recipe_node.default_kind='contract_review', the step starts AND
the QA-005 form opens immediately. Operator signs/dismisses,
navigates back, hits Finish & Next once → step finishes + advances.
Implementation:
fp.job.step.button_start, after super() returns and the
receiving check runs, calls _fp_contract_review_redirect()
(existing helper). If it returns an action, return that
instead of the parent's result. Single-record only — bulk
button_start (job-level start-all) shouldn't navigate.
Helper logic unchanged — same gate matrix:
* recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'
* job has part_catalog_id
* review state NOT in (complete, dismissed)
When review is already complete, the gate clears: button_start
returns the normal True so the operator can advance the step
without bouncing through QA-005 again.
Tests:
test_button_start_routes_cr_step_to_qa005 — start opens QA-005
test_button_start_does_not_route_when_review_complete — start
does NOT redirect once review is signed off
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Scrapped the v2/v3 form-view + list-as-cards CSS approach after
extensive failure to make Odoo's editable list look like cards.
Built a proper OWL Dialog component instead, mirroring the pattern
used by fusion_plating_shopfloor's move_parts_dialog.js.
What changed
============
* New OWL Dialog: fp_record_inputs_dialog.js
- Loads step + prompt definitions via /fp/record_inputs/load
- Renders each prompt as a semantic <div class="o_fp_ri_card">
- Per-row widget chosen by input_type:
numeric/temperature/thickness/time_seconds/ph -> number input
boolean/pass_fail -> custom CSS toggle (clearer than Bootstrap)
date -> datetime-local input
photo -> file picker w/ preview + clear
multi_point_thickness -> 5-cell grid + live average
bath_chemistry_panel -> pH/Conc/Temp/Bath grid
selection -> dropdown sourced from selection_options
text/signature/... -> text input
- Live in-range hint for numeric prompts
("in range" / "below target" / "above target")
- Save validates ad-hoc rows have a Prompt label
- Save dispatches the next_action returned by the wizard model
(e.g. action_finish_and_advance for the Finish & Next flow)
* New XML template: fp_record_inputs_dialog.xml
Full DOM control. No fighting Odoo's list view, no class-stripping
bugs from canUseFormatter, no read-mode-vs-edit-mode CSS dance.
* New SCSS: fp_record_inputs_dialog.scss
- Dark mode aware (compile-time @if $o-webclient-color-scheme==dark)
- Pure semantic selectors (.o_fp_ri_card, .o_fp_ri_input, etc.)
- 14 surface tokens with light/dark hex pairs
- Tablet polish via @media (max-width: 768px)
- Custom toggle widget (no <input type="checkbox"> hidden trick)
* New controller: controllers/record_inputs.py
- /fp/record_inputs/load: returns step + prompts payload
- /fp/record_inputs/commit: creates a wizard, populates lines,
calls action_commit (reuses existing audit-trail / synthetic
move semantics — no commit logic duplicated)
* fp_job_step.py wired to dispatch the new action
- _fp_open_input_wizard returns
{ type: 'ir.actions.client', tag: 'fp_record_inputs_dialog' }
- action_open_input_wizard same
- Contract-review redirect gate preserved (Sub 4 work intact)
* Manifest registers JS/XML/SCSS in BOTH backend + dark bundles
per the dark-mode pattern in CLAUDE.md.
What was kept
=============
* fp.job.step.input.wizard TransientModel — UNCHANGED. The new
controller's commit endpoint creates a wizard record and calls
action_commit() on it, so all the audit-trail / synthetic-move
/ chatter logic stays in Python where it belongs.
* v2 + v3 form views still exist in the XML file. If the OWL
dialog ever fails, switch action_open_input_wizard back to
ir.actions.act_window with view_id=v2 or v3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two coherent feature drops shipping together because their fp_job_step
edits overlap. Both target operator workflow correctness.
## Sub 13 — Sequential step enforcement (recipe + per-step)
Background:
Investigation on WH/JOB/00339 showed operators starting Incoming
Inspection while Contract Review was still in_progress. Audit:
98.7% of recipe operations system-wide had requires_predecessor_done
= false (the legacy per-step opt-in defaults off, recipe authors
rarely tick the box).
Architecture:
Recipe-level toggle + per-step opt-out (Option A from /investigate).
* fusion.plating.process.node.enforce_sequential — Boolean on the
recipe root. Default True. When True, every operation under this
recipe waits for earlier-sequence steps to finish before it can
start.
* fusion.plating.process.node.parallel_start — Boolean on operation
nodes. When True, this step bypasses the sequential gate (e.g.
paperwork or QA review that runs alongside production).
* Mirrored on fp.step.template (parallel_start) so library steps
carry the flag into snapshots.
* fp.job.enforce_sequential — related from recipe_id. Snapshotted
at job creation so a recipe author flipping the recipe's flag
AFTER job generation does NOT change behaviour mid-run.
* fp.job.step.parallel_start — related from recipe_node_id.
* Decision matrix (encapsulated in
fp.job.step._fp_should_block_predecessors):
recipe.enforce_sequential | step.parallel_start | step.req_pred_done | block?
--------------------------|---------------------|--------------------|------
True | False | any | YES
True | True | any | no
False | any | True | YES
False | any | False | no
* Manager bypass via context fp_skip_predecessor_check=True (existing).
Runtime gates:
* fp.job.step.button_start — calls _fp_should_block_predecessors;
raises UserError naming the blocking earlier step(s).
* fp.job.step.can_start — computed Boolean for view-side disable.
* Move wizard predecessor check
(fusion_plating_shopfloor/controllers/move_controller.py) — uses
the same helper so tablet + backend behave identically.
UI surface:
* Recipe form (fp_process_node_views.xml) — enforce_sequential
toggle on recipe root, parallel_start checkbox on operations.
* Step template form — parallel_start checkbox.
* Simple Recipe Editor (inline library form) — Parallel Start
checkbox + legacy flag demoted with muted styling + supervisor
group gate.
* Recipe Tree Editor (properties panel) — both flags exposed,
only-show on the right node_type.
* Controllers updated to allowlist + payload the new fields.
Migration:
fusion_plating/migrations/19.0.18.12.0/post-migrate.py — sets
enforce_sequential = TRUE on every existing recipe-root node.
Idempotent. User confirmed dev-stage data, so retroactive flip
is safe (no production jobs to disrupt).
Tests:
TestSequentialEnforcement (10 tests) covering:
* sequential mode blocks out-of-order start
* first step always startable
* predecessor finish/skip unlocks next
* parallel_start opts out of gate
* free-flow mode bypasses gate
* legacy requires_predecessor_done still honoured in free-flow
* manager bypass via context
* can_start compute reflects state correctly
* library template parallel_start snapshots into recipe-node
## Sub 12e — Record Inputs Wizard v3 (card layout, dark-mode aware)
Background:
v2 wizard was a 17-column wide editable table. Operators got lost
finding which value column applied to their row's type, horizontal
scroll required on tablets, composite types crammed into one row.
New layout:
* Each measurement renders as a stacked card (CSS Grid + display
transformation on the existing list widget — preserves inline
editing, no JS rewrite).
* Card header: prompt name (large, bold) + type/unit pills.
* Card body: ONLY the value widget for this row's type
(number / boolean / date / text / photo / multi-point / panel).
* Composite types (multi-point thickness 5x reading + avg, bath
panel 4 fields) get inline sub-grid inside the card.
* Empty state ("no measurement prompts") with friendly CTA.
Dark mode:
* SCSS branches at compile time on $o-webclient-color-scheme
(per fusion-plating/CLAUDE.md note).
* Tokens: 7 surface colours + 4 ink levels with light/dark hex
pairs, all behind var(--fp-*) custom properties for per-deploy
override.
* Registered in BOTH web.assets_backend AND web.assets_web_dark
so each bundle compiles its own palette.
Tablet polish:
@media (max-width: 900px) — collapse meta below prompt + bump
numeric input min-height to 56px.
Defensive:
* v2 view kept in the XML file (instant rollback by changing one
view_id ref).
* `:has(.o_invisible_modifier)` rule drops empty cells out of the
grid so Odoo's invisible="..." doesn't punch holes in layout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two bugs fixed in one drop, both targeting the contract review (QA-005)
enforcement gap reported on entech.
## Bug 1 — WO step routed to wrong wizard
Symptom: clicking Finish & Next or Record on a Contract Review step in
WH/JOB/00339 opened the generic measurement wizard with three fake
prompts (Reviewer Initials / Date Reviewed / QA-005 Approved). No path
to the actual QA-005 form from the work order.
Root cause: action_finish_and_advance + action_open_input_wizard had no
branch for recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'. The step.kind
mapping collapses contract_review -> 'other' so kind-based detection
wouldn't have worked either; gate has to live at the recipe-node layer.
Fix in fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py (v19.0.8.14.6):
- action_finish_and_advance:329 calls _fp_contract_review_redirect
before the input-wizard branch
- action_open_input_wizard:844 same gate, keeps Record button consistent
- _fp_contract_review_redirect:866 (new) returns the part's
action_start_contract_review() unless review.state in
(complete, dismissed) — gate clears so the step can finish after
the operator signs QA-005.
## Bug 2 — Part create did not enforce contract review
Symptom: spec called for a banner-only UX. User wanted true automatic
enforcement on first part creation under an enforced customer.
Fix in fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_part_catalog.py (v19.0.4.10.0):
- @api.model_create_multi def create() override
- _fp_enforce_contract_review_on_create() helper auto-stages the
fp.contract.review record AND surfaces three prominent reminders:
1. Sticky bus.bus warning toast (top-right, doesn't auto-dismiss)
2. mail.activity (To Do) on the part for the current user
3. Smart button on the part form lights up (review now exists)
- Idempotent: skips parts that already carry a review id
- Soft-fails: bus or activity outage doesn't block part creation
- create()-only — write/update flows never re-trigger
Sub 4's existing info banner stays as a fourth surface.
## Tests
- fusion_plating_jobs/tests/test_fp_job_extensions.py:
+TestContractReviewStepRouting (5 tests covering both routing methods,
the complete/dismissed gate-clear, and non-CR step regression)
- fusion_plating_quality/tests/test_part_catalog_contract_review_enforcement.py
(NEW): 9 tests covering auto-create, batch create, idempotency,
activity surface, bus surface, write-must-not-retrigger, soft-fail.
- docs/superpowers/tests/2026-04-22-sub4-smoke.py: flipped the
"no review yet" assertion to "review auto-created" to match new
behavior. Sign-flow assertions unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Operator Instructions panel had a hardcoded inline style
(background: #f8f9fa) which became a white-on-dark unreadable blob
in dark mode. Replaced with a CSS class backed by an SCSS file that
branches at compile-time via $o-webclient-color-scheme — registered
in both web.assets_backend (light) and web.assets_web_dark (dark)
bundles per the CLAUDE.md pattern.
Tokens: panel bg #f8f9fa light / #22262d dark; border #d8dadd /
#3a3f47; text #212529 / #e8eaed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Click a step's name in the embedded job-form list → opens a read-only
modal with everything a manager wants in one scroll: equipment,
schedule, master collect-measurements banner, operator instructions
(rich-text from recipe_node.description), measurement prompts list,
and values recorded so far.
Implementation: separate read-only form view bound to the embedded
field via context={'form_view_ref': '...'}. The standalone editable
form view stays registered for the Job Steps menu, so direct
navigation still loads the editable variant.
Three new computed/related fields on fp.job.step:
- quick_look_instructions (Html, related from recipe_node_id.description)
- quick_look_prompt_ids (filtered+sorted recipe_node.input_ids, step_input only)
- quick_look_recorded_value_ids (search across moves: input_value rows
whose move.from_step_id == self.id)
Plus a small action_open_full_form method that escapes from the modal
to the editable form when the manager actually needs to edit.
Edge cases:
- No recipe_node_id → instructions panel shows empty-state hint
- collect_measurements=False → amber banner: "Master switch off — no
values will be collected at runtime"
- Multiple moves on same step → values list shows all, newest first
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-30-step-details-modal-design.md.
Verified on entech: step "11. Hard Anodize Type III" populates with
516 chars instructions + 7 prompts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three batched changes that close out the original 10-phase
migration plan.
1. Phase 5 — Job Margin report bound to fp.job (replaces the
mrp.production-bound report_wo_margin). Per-step labour cost
table + margin summary using existing fp.job.step.cost_total
from Phase 1.
2. Polish:
- Real implementations for fp.job.step.button_pause,
button_skip, button_cancel (was NotImplementedError stubs).
button_pause closes the open timelog and sums duration_actual,
mirroring button_finish; button_skip/cancel transition state
with UserError guards.
- Explicit ondelete= policies on fp.job's cross-module Many2ones
(part_catalog/coating restrict, customer_spec/portal/delivery
set null) — was implicit set null.
- Standard Nexa Systems author/website/maintainer/support block
on fusion_plating_jobs manifest, suppressing the install
warning.
3. Legacy hide:
- New 'Plating Legacy Menus' group (group_fusion_plating_legacy_menus)
— nobody in it by default.
- Old shopfloor Manager Desk + Plant Overview + Tablet Station
menus restricted to that group, hiding them from operators
now that the native equivalents under 'Plating Jobs (Native)'
exist. (Note: ir.ui.menu uses group_ids in Odoo 19, not the
deprecated groups_id alias.)
Manifest 19.0.2.4.0 → 19.0.3.0.0. fusion_plating_shopfloor added
to depends so the legacy menu xmlid references resolve at install
time.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
