Commit Graph

20 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gsinghpal
091f98e1f9 changes 2026-05-18 22:33:23 -04:00
gsinghpal
152ed86c3a feat(thickness): single Char range field — drop fp.recipe.thickness picker
Per client direction: every order is a thickness RANGE (e.g.
"0.0005-0.0008 mils" or "5-10 mils"), never a single value. The
old picker model (fp.recipe.thickness with a single 'value' Float)
was modelling the wrong concept and overcrowding the order entry
UI. Replaced with one free-text Char field that auto-fills from
last-used or part default.

DELETED entirely:
- fp.recipe.thickness model (file + view + ACL + manifest entry)
- recipe.thickness_option_ids One2many (the picker source)
- "Thickness Options" inline list on the recipe form
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_id (M2O picker)
- account.move.line.x_fc_thickness_id
- fp.delivery.x_fc_thickness_id
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_id

ADDED:
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_range (Char) — operator types range
- account.move.line.x_fc_thickness_range — for invoice rendering
- fp.delivery.x_fc_thickness_range — for packing slip
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_range — for the wizard
- fp.part.catalog.x_fc_default_thickness_range — part default

AUTO-FILL CHAIN (sale.order.line + wizard line):
1. Operator already typed → keep
2. Most recent SO line for (this part, this customer) with a
   non-empty thickness_range → copy that
3. part.x_fc_default_thickness_range → copy
4. Blank — operator types

Implemented as both an @api.onchange (interactive) AND a
create() override (programmatic — wizard, sale_mrp bridge,
imports). Same logic in both paths.

WIZARD push-to-defaults: when "Save as Default" toggle is ticked
on a wizard line, persist the line's thickness_range to
part.x_fc_default_thickness_range so future first-customer orders
get a sensible starting point.

REPORTS: customer_line_header.xml + report_fp_wo_sticker.xml now
print the Char range as-typed (no display_name lookup needed).

KEPT (admin documentation only — doesn't affect order entry):
- recipe.thickness_min, thickness_max, thickness_uom on the recipe
  root: documents the recipe's CAPABILITY range. No UI gate; just
  for spec authors to record what the chemistry can produce.

JOB GROUPING: fp.job auto-create groups SO lines by (recipe, part,
spec, thickness, serial). Updated to key on the thickness_range
Char (stripped) instead of the deleted thickness_id integer.

DB cleanup: --update=base ran on the upgrade, dropping the
fp_recipe_thickness table + the four x_fc_thickness_id columns.
Existing data was already nulled in earlier dev work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 08:54:40 -04:00
gsinghpal
d891002c84 feat(promote-customer-spec): Phase E — final removal of coating + treatment
DELETED entirely (model + view + ACL + data file + menu):
- fp.coating.config (configurator)
- fp.treatment (configurator + seeded data)
- fp.coating.thickness (configurator) — replaced by fp.recipe.thickness in Phase A
- fp.customer.price.list (configurator) — coating-keyed, no replacement

Field deletions:
- sale.order.x_fc_coating_config_id
- sale.order.line.x_fc_coating_config_id + x_fc_treatment_ids
- account.move.line.x_fc_coating_config_id
- fp.part.catalog.x_fc_default_coating_config_id + x_fc_default_treatment_ids
- fp.job.coating_config_id
- fp.pricing.rule.coating_config_id
- fp.quality.point.coating_config_ids
- fp.direct.order.line.coating_config_id + treatment_ids
- fp.sale.description.template.coating_config_id

Refactored:
- fp.quote.configurator.coating_config_id → recipe_id (now points at
  fusion.plating.process.node, the actual recipe). All compute, onchange,
  and matcher logic updated to use recipe directly. Quality inherit
  extends matcher with spec-tier scoring.
- fp.job._fp_create_certificates now reads spec from job.customer_spec_id
  and formats spec_reference as "code Rev rev". Same for thickness
  source — bake fields read from recipe_root (Phase A).
- fp.job.step.button_finish bake-window auto-spawn reads bake settings
  from recipe_root instead of coating.
- fp.certificate auto-fill spec_min_mils/max_mils from recipe (Phase A
  thickness fields) instead of coating.
- jobs/sale_order.py: job creation reads x_fc_customer_spec_id from
  line, drops coating refs and the legacy header-coating fallback.
- Wizards drop coating + treatment fields and refs.
- Configurator views drop x_fc_coating_config_id + x_fc_treatment_ids
  fields entirely. Quality inherits re-anchor on stable fields
  (x_fc_part_catalog_id, x_fc_internal_description, default_process_id,
  process_variant_id, substrate_material) so they keep working.
- Reports drop coating fallback elifs; print recipe / spec.
- Tablet payload drops coating_config_id from job.read fields.

Skipped (deferred to backlog):
- fusion_plating_bridge_mrp — module is uninstalled per Sub 11; source
  files retain coating refs but no runtime impact.
- fusion_plating_portal — circular dep (portal → quality → certs →
  portal). Customer-facing portal coating picker stays for now;
  promote-spec polish is a separate sub-project.

Verification: grep for "coating_config_id|fp.coating.config|
fp.treatment|fp.coating.thickness" in live (non-bridge_mrp,
non-portal, non-script, non-test) Python/XML/CSV returns 3 hits,
all in module / class docstrings explaining Phase E history.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 02:00:41 -04:00
gsinghpal
c637f82ae2 feat(promote-customer-spec): Phase C — pricing, quality, job, cert re-keyed
Pricing:
- Quality inherit on fp.pricing.rule adds customer_spec_id + recipe_id
- Quality inherit on fp.quote.configurator adds customer_spec_id field
  + extends _find_matching_rule with priority chain:
    spec (+8) > recipe (+6) > coating (+4) > material (+2) > cert (+1)
- View inherit surfaces both new pickers on the rule form

Quality points:
- fp.quality.point now has customer_spec_ids + recipe_ids M2M filters
- Matcher (_matches + _find_matching) accepts new args
- Hook overrides on SO confirm + job confirm/done + step finish
  pass spec/recipe context through to the matcher
- View surfaces both new M2M widgets

Job:
- jobs/sale_order.py wires x_fc_customer_spec_id from SO line to
  fp.job.customer_spec_id on action_confirm

Cert:
- Quality inherit on fp.certificate adds customer_spec_id field +
  create() override auto-fills spec_reference from spec.code+revision
  Resolution priority: explicit spec_reference > cert.customer_spec_id
  > SO line spec (with print_on_cert) > legacy coating fallback

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 01:23:06 -04:00
gsinghpal
f07e1bcce1 fix(chatter): wrap HTML message_post bodies in Markup() — 4 sites
Four message_post calls were passing strings with HTML tags as
plain `body=_(...)` instead of `body=Markup(_(...))`. Odoo escapes
non-Markup strings, so the chatter rendered "<b>QA Review failed</b>"
as literal text instead of bolding it.

Original bug surfaced via the Contract Review (QA-005) flow:
  body: "&lt;b&gt;QA Review failed&lt;/b&gt; by Garry Singh. Awaiting
  client information.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;b&gt;Reason:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
  &lt;div data-oe-version=\"2.0\"&gt;Need to get updated
  drawing...&lt;/div&gt;"

Audit scan turned up three more identical patterns:

  fusion_plating/models/fp_parent_numbered_mixin.py:118
     "Issued <strong>%s</strong> to ..."
  fusion_plating_jobs/models/sale_order.py:282
     "Confirmed quote <strong>%s</strong> as <strong>%s</strong>."
  fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_contract_review.py:430
     "<b>QA Review failed</b> by ... <b>Reason:</b><br/>%(reason)s"
  fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_contract_review.py:524
     "<b>QA Review completed</b> by ... <b>Special Instructions
      captured:</b><br/>%(notes)s"

Fixes:
- Wrapped each body=_(...) with Markup(_(...)) using the
  Markup(template) % values pattern (auto-escapes the substituted
  values; user-supplied free text stays safe).
- For Html-field substitutions (qa_failure_reason,
  special_instructions), explicitly wrapped the value in Markup()
  so already-formatted HTML editor content (with data-oe-version="2.0"
  wrapper divs) flows through without being re-escaped.
- Added `from markupsafe import Markup` to the two files that
  didn't already import it (mixin + contract_review).

Drift cleanup: pulled the 180-line newer fp_contract_review.py
from entech to the local repo (added action_qa_review_failed,
action_open_client_email_wizard, action_view_client_emails,
action_complete_after_info, awaiting_info state, qa_failure_reason
+ special_instructions Html fields, etc. that had been edited on
entech without being committed).

Tested by re-posting via odoo shell on review 10: body now stores
"<b>QA Review failed</b>..." with literal HTML tags instead of
the double-escaped "&lt;b&gt;..." entities. Old chatter records
with the bad escape stay as-is in the audit trail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 08:41:39 -04:00
gsinghpal
e4681a58c6 fix(jobs): split fp.jobs by thickness + serial on SO confirm
The _fp_auto_create_job grouping key was (recipe, part, coating).
Lines that shared all three but differed in thickness (or serial)
silently collapsed into one fp.job — the second line's thickness/SN
was lost, and any downstream cert printed the first line's values
across both batches. Silent mis-attestation = compliance hole.

Extended the key tuple to (recipe, part, coating, thickness, serial).
Single-line SOs and same-(thickness, SN) multi-line SOs collapse
identically to before. Only lines that previously merged when they
shouldn't have now split into their own fp.jobs.

TDD via test_so_confirm_splits_by_thickness:
  - seeds the part with default_process_id so both lines hit the
    `if recipe:` branch (where the bug lived — the no_recipe branch
    already split correctly per line)
  - confirms 2 jobs after action_confirm with each carrying its
    own thickness via the linked SO line

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 07:57:56 -04:00
gsinghpal
457d9b7dbf fix(numbering): post-review fixes — credit notes, SO unlink, multi-part grouping, SQL whitelist
- B1: Add Credit Note wizard path was blocked because invoice_origin
  has copy=False and the wizard doesn't set fp_from_so_invoice. Now
  the validator allows reversals when reversed_entry_id points at a
  customer-facing move that itself went through the validator at
  original creation time. account.move._fp_parent_sale_order also
  walks self.reversed_entry_id._fp_parent_sale_order so the credit
  note inherits the parent number (CN-<parent>).

- Bug 1: sale.order.unlink() now blocks deletion when x_fc_parent_number
  is set (matches spec §6.2). Draft quotes remain freely deletable
  per Odoo standard. Applies to all users including admins.

- Bug 2: out_receipt added to CUSTOMER_TYPES so POS-style receipts
  hit the same SO-flow gate as out_invoice / out_refund.

- C1: WO grouping key changed from recipe.id to (recipe.id, part.id,
  coating.id). Bundling lines with different parts under one WO put
  first_line's part_number on the CoC header — silent compliance
  mis-attestation. Now distinct parts always get distinct WOs even
  when they share a recipe.

- C3: SQL whitelist (_FP_COUNTER_FIELD_RE) on _fp_assign_parent_name's
  interpolated counter field name. No user input today; defence in
  depth for future subclasses that might read the name from context.

Verified on entech: parent=30017, credit note = CN-30017,
multi-part SO produces 2 WOs (one per part), confirmed-SO unlink
blocked, out_receipt blocked, whitelist regex enforced.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 18:19:08 -04:00
gsinghpal
0d85063b5e feat(numbering): wire CoC/RCV/DLV/PU into parent-numbered mixin + rename counters
Per-model counter fields on sale.order renamed to x_fc_pn_*_count
to avoid collision with pre-existing compute fields of the same
short name in bridge_mrp / receiving / configurator (silent
compute-override was suppressing the storage). 4 child models
(fp.certificate, fp.receiving, fusion.plating.delivery,
fusion.plating.pickup.request) now derive names as PFX-<parent>
with -NN suffix from the 2nd onward.

fusion.plating.pickup.request gains a sale_order_id field
(optional) so pickups created against an SO get parent-derived
names, while standalone pickups (pre-SO) fall back to PU/YYYY/NNNN.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:30:37 -04:00
gsinghpal
765a0a4c82 feat(numbering): block direct invoice creation + wire account.move into mixin
Customer invoices (out_invoice / out_refund) can only be created via
sale.order._create_invoices() or with an invoice_origin matching an
existing SO. Applies to ALL users including admins. Once created,
the move's name is derived from the SO's parent number: IN-30000,
IN-30000-02, CN-30000, ... Pre-existing portal-job link on
action_post() preserved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:21:09 -04:00
gsinghpal
6c6fb8d2a4 feat(numbering): WO grouping by recipe + parent-derived bulk naming
Replaces x_fc_wo_group_tag grouping with resolved-recipe grouping.
Bare WO-<parent> when 1 recipe, WO-<parent>-NN zero-padded for N>1
ordered by min line sequence. fp.job inherits parent-numbered mixin
for the manual-add path; bulk SO-confirm sets names explicitly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:18:10 -04:00
gsinghpal
1b1bebdcd8 feat(numbering): assign parent_number + rename to SO-<n> on confirm
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:14:47 -04:00
gsinghpal
e0d1998811 feat(numbering): draw quote name from fp.quote.number on SO create
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:12:45 -04:00
gsinghpal
bc3f584851 feat(numbering): add parent_number + counters to sale.order
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 13:10:55 -04:00
gsinghpal
15eac309ee feat(jobs): persist deadlines + planned start + notes on fp.job
Tier 2 of the SO->fp.job persistence audit. Four operational metadata
fields mirrored from sale.order:

- x_fc_internal_deadline (Date) - shop's internal target finish date,
  ahead of the customer-facing deadline. Kept separate from
  date_deadline (which scheduling code may adjust).
- x_fc_planned_start_date (Date) - customer-quoted planned start date.
  Kept separate from date_planned_start (Datetime, capacity-adjusted).
- x_fc_internal_note (Text) - shop-internal notes from the order.
- x_fc_external_note (Text) - customer-facing notes, printed on
  traveller / BoL / cert.

All four populate at SO confirm via _fp_auto_create_job, and surface
on sale.order.line as stored related fields for per-line visibility.
fp.job form view gets a Notes group alongside the Customer References
group from Tier 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:37:19 -04:00
gsinghpal
7d37f5713c feat(jobs): persist Customer Job # + PO # + Rush Order on fp.job
Tier 1 of the SO->fp.job persistence audit. Three customer-reference
fields entered on sale.order's Plating tab were not flowing through
to fp.job (or SO lines), so the shop floor and printed paperwork
(traveller, BoL, cert) had to round-trip via sale_order_id every time.

Changes:
- fp.job: new x_fc_customer_job_number (Char, tracking), x_fc_po_number
  (Char, tracking), x_fc_rush_order (Boolean, tracking). All three
  populated by _fp_auto_create_job at SO confirm time.
- sale.order.line: x_fc_customer_job_number / x_fc_po_number added as
  stored related fields off order_id so per-line list views show the
  customer's references without navigating to the order header
  (x_fc_rush_order was already on lines).
- fp.job form view: small Customer References group under the title
  surfaces the three fields where the user expects them.

Verified end-to-end: SO -> SO line related fields -> fp.job direct
fields all carry the same value.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:34:56 -04:00
gsinghpal
cd2584d6ee ui(rename): "Plating Job" -> "Work Order" / display "WO # 01368"
Standardise user-facing terminology across 5 modules (27 files):
  - display_name compute: 'Work Order # 01368' -> 'WO # 01368'
  - _description on 5 models: Plating Job{," Step"," Step Time Log"," Margin Report"," Recipe Node Override"} -> Work Order equivalents
  - field labels (string=...) on 13 Many2one / One2many fields
    across fp.batch, fp.thickness_reading, fp.quality.hold,
    fp.job_consumption, fp.portal.job, fp.certificate, fp.delivery,
    fp.quality.check, fp.racking.inspection, res.partner, sale.order
  - XML view labels: action names, list/form/search strings,
    portal template names, dashboard tile titles

What's deliberately preserved:
  - DB model name 'fp.job' (technical identifier — used by
    sale_order.x_fc_plating_job_ids and all comodel refs)
  - Module name 'fusion_plating_jobs' (directory / import path)
  - Settings -> Apps display label 'Fusion Plating Jobs' (module
    identity for Odoo's app picker)
  - 'Use Native Plating Jobs' migration toggle (internal mechanism
    flag, not user-facing terminology)

Verified on entech: WH/JOB/01368 now displays as 'WO # 01368'
everywhere humans look (form header, breadcrumbs, M2O dropdowns,
error messages, smart-button titles).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:22:09 -04:00
gsinghpal
6b7b44264a changes 2026-05-10 10:25:12 -04:00
gsinghpal
f08f328688 changes 2026-04-27 00:11:18 -04:00
gsinghpal
d9f58b9851 changes 2026-04-26 15:05:17 -04:00
gsinghpal
294cea0e50 feat(jobs): add x_fc_use_native_jobs flag + SO confirm hook (Task 2.5)
Settings flag controls which SO confirm path runs. Default False
keeps the legacy bridge_mrp / mrp.production flow on entech.
Setting True diverts confirm into fp.job creation.

Both hooks coexist — bridge_mrp's _fp_auto_create_mo and the new
_fp_auto_create_job — but only one creates records per SO confirm
(controlled by the flag).

The new _fp_auto_create_job mirrors bridge_mrp's grouping logic
(x_fc_wo_group_tag), recipe resolution (coating → part), and
traceability fields (origin, sale_order_line_ids).

Settings UI shows the flag in a 'Fusion Plating Jobs' app section
of the standard Configuration menu.

3 new tests cover: flag off no-op, flag on creates job, idempotency.

Manifest 19.0.1.3.0 → 19.0.1.4.0.

Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-24 23:22:41 -04:00