Commit Graph

110 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gsinghpal
7bcbcb4008 fix(plating-perms): deploy-time cascade fixes from entech I3
5 fixes discovered during the live deploy to entech LXC 111:

1. pre-migrate.py to rename old configurator's 'Shop Manager' group BEFORE
   new core 'Shop Manager v2' XML loads (cross-module name collision on
   res_groups_name_uniq).

2. res_company_views.xml: dropped ref() inside <field domain=> attribute
   (Odoo 19 view validator interprets it as a field name).

3. sale_order_views.xml: replaced 3 separate xpaths for amount_total /
   amount_untaxed / amount_tax with a single xpath on tax_totals widget
   (Odoo 19 sale.view_order_form uses one widget instead of separate fields).

4. fp_cert_security.xml: certificate_type field, not cert_type. FAIR is a
   separate model so the rule only restricts cert_type='nadcap_cert' now.

5. fp_certificate_views.xml + fp_capa_views.xml + fp_customer_spec_views.xml:
   stripped user_has_groups() from invisible= / readonly= attrs (Odoo 19
   view validator interprets as field name). Model-layer ACLs and ir.rules
   already enforce the same restrictions.

Also fixed res.groups.users -> user_ids in fp_migration.py (Odoo 19 rename,
caught when manually invoking _fp_notify_owners post-deploy).

CLAUDE.md updated with 4 new rules (13e cross-module name collisions,
13f ref() in domain, 13g tax_totals widget, 13h user_has_groups in attrs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 09:07:13 -04:00
gsinghpal
0047f49d2c fix(plating-perms): address final-reviewer critical + important issues
Pre-deploy fixes for Phase 1 permissions overhaul branch (catches by
final-reviewer subagent + main session).

CRITICAL FIXES:

C1: groups_id -> group_ids (Odoo 19 field rename). Affected ~30 sites
    across 4 model files, 1 view, 7 test files. Documented project
    gotcha (feedback_odoo19_groups_id_renamed.md) that the implementer
    subagents missed because they don't see user memory.

C2: action_fp_resolve_plating_landing server action now calls
    env['ir.actions.act_window'].sudo()._fp_resolve_landing_for_current_user()
    instead of the old inline priority chain. Phase E's role-based
    dispatch was previously dead code.

C3: New migrations/19.0.21.1.0/post-migrate.py triggers
    _fp_post_init_role_migration(env) on -u. post_init_hook only fires
    on INSTALL in Odoo 19, not UPGRADE -- so Phase H's preview creation
    wouldn't have auto-fired on entech without this script. Module
    version bumped to 19.0.21.1.0 to match the migration directory.

C4: Team kanban template rewritten for Odoo 19 (<t t-name='card'> with
    semantic <aside>/<main>) instead of legacy <t t-name='kanban-box'>.
    Previous template threw 'Missing card template' at render.

IMPORTANT FIXES:

I1: SO state=sent Confirm button (id='action_confirm') now also gated
    to group_fp_sales_manager. Previously only the state=draft button
    was gated; Sales Reps could send-and-confirm via the secondary path.

I2: Designated Officials picker domain uses all_group_ids (transitive)
    instead of group_ids (explicit only). Owner users now correctly
    appear as eligible CGP DO candidates via the implied_ids chain.

I3: test_menu_visibility.py compliance hub xmlid corrected to
    fusion_plating.menu_fp_compliance_hub (was
    fusion_plating_compliance.menu_fp_compliance_hub which doesn't exist
    -- the hub menu is defined in core's fp_menu.xml). Tests were
    silently skipTest-ing.

I4: _inverse_plating_role chatter audit reads old role from DB via SQL
    (bypasses cache) so 'old -> new' displays actual values, and
    short-circuits no-op writes.

I5: _FP_ROLE_MAPPING_RULES reordered: cgp_designated_official fires
    BEFORE admin/uid_1_or_2 so admin+DO users keep the capability_delta
    marker that triggers res.company.x_fc_cgp_designated_official_id
    auto-set during migration.

I6: _cron_purge_expired_migrations skips groups with active users
    instead of unlink-ing unconditionally. Defense against rollback
    safety being bypassed by manual role assignments post-migration.

CLAUDE.md updated with 3 new durable rules (13b kanban card template,
13c group_ids vs all_group_ids, 13d post_init_hook only on install).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 08:37:13 -04:00
gsinghpal
de3ec7d97a feat(plating-sec): SO confirm gate + fix _administrator typo + Python sweep
Phase G of permissions overhaul.

G2: sale.order.action_confirm now requires group_fp_sales_manager
(spec Section 2.B). Sales Reps can save drafts but cannot move SOs
to 'sale' state. UserError raised with clear message if attempted.

G3: Fixed audit-finding-11 typo bug in 2 files. The original code
checked has_group('fusion_plating.group_fusion_plating_administrator'),
an xmlid that has NEVER existed - so the gate always returned False
and only the Manager-side check actually fired. Fixed both:
  - fusion_plating_invoicing/models/res_partner.py:34
  - fusion_plating_configurator/wizard/fp_direct_order_wizard.py:467
Both now check has_group('fusion_plating.group_fp_manager') which
transitively includes Owner via implied_ids.

G4: Swept all Python has_group() calls to reference new group xmlids.
Backward-compat keeps old refs working today (Phase A's implied_ids),
but the sweep ensures correctness after the 30-day rollback window
deletes old groups. Replacements:
  group_fusion_plating_operator    -> group_fp_technician
  group_fusion_plating_supervisor  -> group_fp_shop_manager_v2
  group_fusion_plating_manager     -> group_fp_manager
  group_fusion_plating_admin       -> group_fp_owner
  group_fusion_plating_cgp_officer -> group_fp_quality_manager
  group_fusion_plating_cgp_designated_official -> group_fp_owner
  group_fp_estimator               -> group_fp_sales_rep
  group_fp_accounting              -> group_fp_manager
  group_fp_receiving               -> group_fp_shop_manager_v2
  group_fp_shop_manager (legacy)   -> group_fp_manager

G1: test_sales_manager_gate.py covers the new confirm gate (SR
blocked, SMg allowed, Manager allowed via diamond implication).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 02:11:35 -04:00
gsinghpal
269f9984ef feat(plating-views): Layer 3 — field/button gates per role
Phase D Task D5 of permissions overhaul. Adds explicit groups= to
form-level elements so non-matching roles don't even SEE the buttons
they can't use:

- SO Confirm button → group_fp_sales_manager (Sales Rep sees the SO
  in draft but no Confirm button — matches model-level gate from Phase G)
- SO pricing fields (price_unit/subtotal/total/untaxed/tax) →
  group_fp_sales_rep (Technician/Shop Manager don't see pricing if
  they navigate to an SO)
- Partner Account Hold tab → group_fp_manager (was the fold-in
  group_fp_accounting; the audit-finding-11 _administrator typo lives
  in res_partner.py and is Phase G's fix)
- CAPA Close + all state-transition buttons → group_fp_quality_manager;
  edit fields use readonly="not user_has_groups(...)" so Manager
  retains read+comment per spec section 2.C
- Audit Start/Findings/Close buttons → group_fp_quality_manager
- AVL Approve/Suspend/Reinstate/Remove → group_fp_quality_manager
  (model uses Suspend+Remove instead of spec's literal 'Disqualify';
  both surfaces gated, semantics match)
- Customer Spec edit fields → readonly for non-QM (Manager keeps
  read access per spec; only inputs lock)
- FAIR Approve/Reject buttons → group_fp_quality_manager (Submit-
  for-Review and Reset stay open to whoever created the FAIR)
- Certificate Issue button — Strategy B chosen: single button hidden
  when cert_type=nadcap_cert AND user is not QM. Cleaner than splitting
  into two buttons; no separate action_sign exists on fp.certificate
  (Issue is the sign+publish action). FAIR lives in its own model;
  fp.certificate only has nadcap_cert as a special type. The ir.rule
  from Phase C enforces model-level writes independently.
- CGP form buttons (7 view files: ai, controlled_good, psa,
  receipt_shipment, registration, security_incident, visitor) →
  group_fp_quality_manager on every action button

Defense in depth: ir.rules and ACLs (from Phases B + C) already
restrict model access. These view gates are the UI layer that
matches.

Concerns:
- Spec line 192 names 'sale.order view — x_fc_account_hold_override'
  but no such field exists in the codebase. Closest practical match
  was the partner-side Account Hold management tab, which already had
  a group= attribute. Re-gated there; no SO-side field to gate.
- AVL model has no action_disqualify per spec; uses suspend+remove.
  Both gated to QM.
- fp.certificate has no action_sign (only action_issue). FAIR's
  approve/reject covers the FAIR side; nadcap-cert Issue covers the
  cert side via Strategy B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 01:45:39 -04:00
gsinghpal
36cd4341a7 feat(plating-menu): Layer 1+2 — explicit groups on top-level menus + submenus
Phase D Tasks D1-D4 of permissions overhaul. Adds explicit groups=
attributes to:
- 9 top-level Plating menus (matrix per spec Section 2.E)
- Quality submenus: Audits, Customer Specs, AVL → QM-only
- Compliance hub child submenus (CGP, General, Safety, Aerospace,
  Nuclear) → QM-only
- Operations submenus: Maintenance, Move Log, Labor History → Shop
  Manager+; Replenishment Suggestions → Manager+

Replaces fragile inheritance + action-ACL-based visibility with
explicit per-menu gates. Now every role's menu tree is deterministic.

Also adds fusion_plating/tests/test_menu_visibility.py — per-role
matrix tests using ir.ui.menu.search_count with the test user.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 01:35:11 -04:00
gsinghpal
8eb2c2de95 refactor(plating-sec): sweep all ACL CSVs to new role group xmlids
Phase B of permissions overhaul. Mechanical text replacement across
11 ir.model.access.csv files:
  - group_fusion_plating_operator    -> fusion_plating.group_fp_technician
  - group_fusion_plating_supervisor  -> fusion_plating.group_fp_shop_manager_v2
  - group_fusion_plating_manager     -> fusion_plating.group_fp_manager
  - group_fusion_plating_admin       -> fusion_plating.group_fp_owner
  - group_fp_estimator (configurator)-> fusion_plating.group_fp_sales_rep
  - group_fp_accounting              -> fusion_plating.group_fp_manager
  - group_fp_receiving               -> fusion_plating.group_fp_shop_manager_v2
  - group_fp_shop_manager (legacy)   -> fusion_plating.group_fp_manager
  - group_fusion_plating_cgp_officer -> fusion_plating.group_fp_quality_manager
  - group_fusion_plating_cgp_designated_official -> fusion_plating.group_fp_owner

Backward-compat: old group xmlids still resolve (Phase A's implied_ids
chains keep old ACLs working for users still holding old groups).
This sweep ensures future-state correctness: when old groups are deleted
after the 30-day rollback window, ACLs continue resolving via the new
group xmlids.

Also adds fusion_plating/tests/test_acl_migration.py with sample-based
per-role access checks. The 2 CAPA tests are expected to fail until
Phase C implements the Manager/QM quality split.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 01:14:02 -04:00
gsinghpal
6c7e11db4d fix(plating-sec): move cross-module implied_ids out of fp_security_v2.xml
The previous commit (a53b0326) added implied_ids in fp_security_v2.xml
that referenced 5 xmlids from downstream modules (configurator/receiving/
invoicing/cgp). Since fusion_plating is the BASE module and loads first
at fresh install, those refs raised External-ID-not-found at install.

Fix: relocate the 5 cross-module implications into each downstream module's
own security file via additive (4, ref()) writes to the core group's
implied_ids. Odoo's XML data loader treats these as additive updates so
they stack cleanly across install + -u cycles.

Also: drop redundant <data noupdate="0"> wrapper in fp_security_v2.xml
to match sibling fp_security.xml's bare <odoo> shape.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 00:59:20 -04:00
gsinghpal
a53b03265d feat(plating-sec): add 8 consolidated role groups + mark old groups deprecated
Phase A of permissions overhaul (see docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-23-*).
New groups (technician/sales_rep/shop_manager_v2/sales_manager/manager/
quality_manager/owner) defined in fp_security_v2.xml with implied_ids
chains that include old groups for backward-compat during 30-day rollback
window. Old groups display as [DEPRECATED] in user form.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 00:47:54 -04:00
gsinghpal
f661724c72 changes 2026-05-22 18:01:31 -04:00
gsinghpal
d127e19b45 changes 2026-05-21 21:00:10 -04:00
gsinghpal
b395600a1c changes 2026-05-21 05:18:32 -04:00
gsinghpal
d6d6249857 changes 2026-05-21 04:47:45 -04:00
gsinghpal
1314f4581d changes 2026-05-21 03:37:25 -04:00
gsinghpal
d7bee9e854 fix(configurator): widen Template dropdown in Add Variant strip
Reported 2026-05-20: the Template dropdown in the Part > Process
Composer's 'Add Variant from Template' row truncated long recipe
names to 4 characters ("Cher" instead of "Chemical Conversion …").
The hard-coded max-width: 280px was set before the curated template
catalog grew names like "Chemical Conversion — Iridite Type II Cl 3"
and "ENP-STEEL-BASIC — Standard Heavy Phos".

Fix: replace the rigid max-width with a flex sizing that gives the
dropdown room to grow:
  - min-width: 360px (full common recipe name fits)
  - flex: 1 1 360px  (grows to fill available space)
  - max-width: 560px (cap so it doesn't push the buttons off-screen)

Same flex pattern applied to the Variant label input (slightly
narrower min/max).

Also: pulled the entech-side version of fp_part_process_composer.xml
back into the local repo — local was stale (one 'Add Variant' button;
entech had the dual 'Add — Tree' / 'Add — Simple' buttons that
landed in an out-of-band edit).

Module: fusion_plating_configurator 19.0.21.5.0 → 19.0.21.5.1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 08:27:04 -04:00
gsinghpal
091f98e1f9 changes 2026-05-18 22:33:23 -04:00
gsinghpal
d3c5c25865 changes
Some checks failed
fusion_accounting CI / test (fusion_accounting_ai) (push) Has been cancelled
fusion_accounting CI / test (fusion_accounting_core) (push) Has been cancelled
fusion_accounting CI / test (fusion_accounting_migration) (push) Has been cancelled
2026-05-17 03:20:33 -04:00
gsinghpal
152ed86c3a feat(thickness): single Char range field — drop fp.recipe.thickness picker
Per client direction: every order is a thickness RANGE (e.g.
"0.0005-0.0008 mils" or "5-10 mils"), never a single value. The
old picker model (fp.recipe.thickness with a single 'value' Float)
was modelling the wrong concept and overcrowding the order entry
UI. Replaced with one free-text Char field that auto-fills from
last-used or part default.

DELETED entirely:
- fp.recipe.thickness model (file + view + ACL + manifest entry)
- recipe.thickness_option_ids One2many (the picker source)
- "Thickness Options" inline list on the recipe form
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_id (M2O picker)
- account.move.line.x_fc_thickness_id
- fp.delivery.x_fc_thickness_id
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_id

ADDED:
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_range (Char) — operator types range
- account.move.line.x_fc_thickness_range — for invoice rendering
- fp.delivery.x_fc_thickness_range — for packing slip
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_range — for the wizard
- fp.part.catalog.x_fc_default_thickness_range — part default

AUTO-FILL CHAIN (sale.order.line + wizard line):
1. Operator already typed → keep
2. Most recent SO line for (this part, this customer) with a
   non-empty thickness_range → copy that
3. part.x_fc_default_thickness_range → copy
4. Blank — operator types

Implemented as both an @api.onchange (interactive) AND a
create() override (programmatic — wizard, sale_mrp bridge,
imports). Same logic in both paths.

WIZARD push-to-defaults: when "Save as Default" toggle is ticked
on a wizard line, persist the line's thickness_range to
part.x_fc_default_thickness_range so future first-customer orders
get a sensible starting point.

REPORTS: customer_line_header.xml + report_fp_wo_sticker.xml now
print the Char range as-typed (no display_name lookup needed).

KEPT (admin documentation only — doesn't affect order entry):
- recipe.thickness_min, thickness_max, thickness_uom on the recipe
  root: documents the recipe's CAPABILITY range. No UI gate; just
  for spec authors to record what the chemistry can produce.

JOB GROUPING: fp.job auto-create groups SO lines by (recipe, part,
spec, thickness, serial). Updated to key on the thickness_range
Char (stripped) instead of the deleted thickness_id integer.

DB cleanup: --update=base ran on the upgrade, dropping the
fp_recipe_thickness table + the four x_fc_thickness_id columns.
Existing data was already nulled in earlier dev work.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 08:54:40 -04:00
gsinghpal
1ed414c6fb chore(menu): retire Configurator top-level — fold survivors into Configuration hub
After Phase E removed Coating Config + Treatments + Customer Price List
+ Coating Thickness from the Configurator submenu, only 3 admin items
remained — not enough to justify a top-level menu just for an
estimator.

Re-homed:
- Pricing Rules                → Configuration → Pricing & Billing
                                  (sequence 40, joins Invoice Strategy
                                   Defaults + Account Holds)
- Materials                    → Configuration → Materials & Tanks
                                  (sequence 40, joins Bath Parameters,
                                   Replenishment Rules, Chemicals,
                                   Rack Tags, Calibration Equipment)
- Line Description Templates   → Configuration → Quality & Documents
                                  (sequence 90, joins Notification
                                   Templates — same "templates" pattern)

All three keep estimator visibility (group_fp_estimator) plus manager
access. Top-level menu count under "Plating" drops from 9 visible to 8.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 07:52:53 -04:00
gsinghpal
7d27db69c6 fix(promote-customer-spec): leftover has_cost_data ref in _compute_margin
Phase E removed the coating-rollup loop but left a stale `has_cost_data`
reference in the percent computation. NameError on every SO list /
form load.

Margin is "not available" until recipe-level cost data exists
(backlog item). Set all three margin fields to 0 / False explicitly
so no stale references remain.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 07:11:41 -04:00
gsinghpal
d891002c84 feat(promote-customer-spec): Phase E — final removal of coating + treatment
DELETED entirely (model + view + ACL + data file + menu):
- fp.coating.config (configurator)
- fp.treatment (configurator + seeded data)
- fp.coating.thickness (configurator) — replaced by fp.recipe.thickness in Phase A
- fp.customer.price.list (configurator) — coating-keyed, no replacement

Field deletions:
- sale.order.x_fc_coating_config_id
- sale.order.line.x_fc_coating_config_id + x_fc_treatment_ids
- account.move.line.x_fc_coating_config_id
- fp.part.catalog.x_fc_default_coating_config_id + x_fc_default_treatment_ids
- fp.job.coating_config_id
- fp.pricing.rule.coating_config_id
- fp.quality.point.coating_config_ids
- fp.direct.order.line.coating_config_id + treatment_ids
- fp.sale.description.template.coating_config_id

Refactored:
- fp.quote.configurator.coating_config_id → recipe_id (now points at
  fusion.plating.process.node, the actual recipe). All compute, onchange,
  and matcher logic updated to use recipe directly. Quality inherit
  extends matcher with spec-tier scoring.
- fp.job._fp_create_certificates now reads spec from job.customer_spec_id
  and formats spec_reference as "code Rev rev". Same for thickness
  source — bake fields read from recipe_root (Phase A).
- fp.job.step.button_finish bake-window auto-spawn reads bake settings
  from recipe_root instead of coating.
- fp.certificate auto-fill spec_min_mils/max_mils from recipe (Phase A
  thickness fields) instead of coating.
- jobs/sale_order.py: job creation reads x_fc_customer_spec_id from
  line, drops coating refs and the legacy header-coating fallback.
- Wizards drop coating + treatment fields and refs.
- Configurator views drop x_fc_coating_config_id + x_fc_treatment_ids
  fields entirely. Quality inherits re-anchor on stable fields
  (x_fc_part_catalog_id, x_fc_internal_description, default_process_id,
  process_variant_id, substrate_material) so they keep working.
- Reports drop coating fallback elifs; print recipe / spec.
- Tablet payload drops coating_config_id from job.read fields.

Skipped (deferred to backlog):
- fusion_plating_bridge_mrp — module is uninstalled per Sub 11; source
  files retain coating refs but no runtime impact.
- fusion_plating_portal — circular dep (portal → quality → certs →
  portal). Customer-facing portal coating picker stays for now;
  promote-spec polish is a separate sub-project.

Verification: grep for "coating_config_id|fp.coating.config|
fp.treatment|fp.coating.thickness" in live (non-bridge_mrp,
non-portal, non-script, non-test) Python/XML/CSV returns 3 hits,
all in module / class docstrings explaining Phase E history.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 02:00:41 -04:00
gsinghpal
7cafab1b9f feat(promote-customer-spec): Phase B — two-picker SO line UX
Spec-side picker (x_fc_customer_spec_id / customer_spec_id) added on:
- sale.order.line (via quality inherit — onchange autofill, create()
  fallback to part default, _prepare_invoice_line carry)
- account.move.line (via quality inherit — invoice rendering)
- fp.part.catalog (via quality inherit — x_fc_default_customer_spec_id)
- fp.direct.order.line (via quality inherit — wizard picker + autofill)
- fp.direct.order.wizard (action_create_order post-creates spec on SO line)

Thickness picker switched to fp.recipe.thickness (replaces coating-scoped):
- sale.order.line.x_fc_thickness_id comodel + domain rewired to recipe
- account.move.line + fp.delivery same
- fp.direct.order.line.thickness_id same

View inherits in quality add Specification picker next to legacy
Primary Treatment column on:
- SO form line tree
- part catalog Default Treatments block
- direct-order wizard line tree + drawer

Wizard files (fp.contract.review.client.email.wizard) pulled from
entech into the repo — they were ahead of the repo. Quality __init__
now imports wizards/.

Legacy x_fc_coating_config_id + treatment_ids remain visible during
transition; Phase E removes them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-15 01:16:25 -04:00
gsinghpal
5b399fbdda fix(configurator): copy operator-input prompts when cloning recipe to part
_clone_subtree() in fp_part_composer_controller built node vals
manually and never copied source.input_ids — so 'Load Template'
copied the recipe tree structure but dropped every custom prompt,
leaving operators with empty data-capture screens. The fix iterates
input_ids and calls .copy({'node_id': new_node.id}) so kind,
target_min/max/unit, compliance_tag, hint, selection_options,
sequence — every field on the input model — flows through.

Verified on entech: ENP-ALUM-BASIC clone now shows all 105 prompts.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 17:58:11 -04:00
gsinghpal
2d9779047b fix(jobs): registry load failure after Tier 2/3 persistence patches
Two compounding issues introduced by the persistence audit work:

1. fields.Text mismatch: sale.order.x_fc_internal_note and
   x_fc_external_note are actually fields.Html. I declared the
   sale.order.line related mirrors and the fp.job stored copies as
   fields.Text, so setup_related raised:
     TypeError: Type of related field
     sale.order.line.x_fc_internal_note is inconsistent with
     sale.order.x_fc_internal_note
   Fixed by switching both Note fields on fp.job and sale.order.line
   to fields.Html.

2. Module-load-order: Tier 3 fields (x_fc_delivery_method,
   x_fc_ship_via, x_fc_invoice_strategy) are defined in
   fusion_plating_jobs (related to sale.order via _inherit), but I
   referenced them in fusion_plating core's fp_job_views.xml — which
   loads BEFORE fusion_plating_jobs registers the fields. View
   validator raised "Field x_fc_delivery_method does not exist".
   Fixed by removing those 3 fields from the core view group and
   adding them via xpath in fusion_plating_jobs's fp_job_form_inherit
   (which loads after the fields are registered).

Both fixes deployed and verified — registry loads in 2s, all field
types match, related path resolves correctly. No data loss; the
fp.job rows that already had stored Text content for internal_note /
external_note will carry over into the Html field intact.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:45:59 -04:00
gsinghpal
cba9a6da6b feat(jobs): mirror delivery_method/ship_via/invoice_strategy on fp.job
Tier 3 of the SO->fp.job persistence audit. Three logistics/billing
fields surface on fp.job as related read-only (not stored) mirrors:

- x_fc_delivery_method - Local Delivery / Shipping Partner / Customer
  Pickup. Cargo classification used by logistics planning.
- x_fc_ship_via - Carrier name (UPS, FedEx, customer pickup, etc.).
- x_fc_invoice_strategy - Deposit / Progress / Net Terms / COD-Prepay.
  Read by the invoicing module's hooks; mirroring on the WO is for
  manager visibility only.

These were intentionally chosen as related (not stored persisted)
because the SO is the authoritative source - the existing downstream
code (delivery + invoicing modules) already reads them off SO directly.
A stored copy would risk drift. Related auto-follows SO updates.

Same three fields also mirrored on sale.order.line as stored related
for per-line list visibility.

Closes the SO->fp.job persistence audit. All 10 operational fields
identified now flow through to the WO (7 stored + populated at confirm,
3 related read-only).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:39:12 -04:00
gsinghpal
15eac309ee feat(jobs): persist deadlines + planned start + notes on fp.job
Tier 2 of the SO->fp.job persistence audit. Four operational metadata
fields mirrored from sale.order:

- x_fc_internal_deadline (Date) - shop's internal target finish date,
  ahead of the customer-facing deadline. Kept separate from
  date_deadline (which scheduling code may adjust).
- x_fc_planned_start_date (Date) - customer-quoted planned start date.
  Kept separate from date_planned_start (Datetime, capacity-adjusted).
- x_fc_internal_note (Text) - shop-internal notes from the order.
- x_fc_external_note (Text) - customer-facing notes, printed on
  traveller / BoL / cert.

All four populate at SO confirm via _fp_auto_create_job, and surface
on sale.order.line as stored related fields for per-line visibility.
fp.job form view gets a Notes group alongside the Customer References
group from Tier 1.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:37:19 -04:00
gsinghpal
7d37f5713c feat(jobs): persist Customer Job # + PO # + Rush Order on fp.job
Tier 1 of the SO->fp.job persistence audit. Three customer-reference
fields entered on sale.order's Plating tab were not flowing through
to fp.job (or SO lines), so the shop floor and printed paperwork
(traveller, BoL, cert) had to round-trip via sale_order_id every time.

Changes:
- fp.job: new x_fc_customer_job_number (Char, tracking), x_fc_po_number
  (Char, tracking), x_fc_rush_order (Boolean, tracking). All three
  populated by _fp_auto_create_job at SO confirm time.
- sale.order.line: x_fc_customer_job_number / x_fc_po_number added as
  stored related fields off order_id so per-line list views show the
  customer's references without navigating to the order header
  (x_fc_rush_order was already on lines).
- fp.job form view: small Customer References group under the title
  surfaces the three fields where the user expects them.

Verified end-to-end: SO -> SO line related fields -> fp.job direct
fields all carry the same value.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-12 08:34:56 -04:00
gsinghpal
6b7b44264a changes 2026-05-10 10:25:12 -04:00
gsinghpal
1da27ed6bf changes 2026-05-01 00:20:40 -04:00
gsinghpal
b187192c58 feat(step-library): full plating workflow coverage + per-recipe configurability + audit
Implements 2026-04-29-step-library-audit-design.md. Bumps fusion_plating
to 19.0.18.7.0, fusion_plating_jobs to 19.0.8.12.0, fusion_plating_reports
to 19.0.10.2.0.

LIBRARY EXPANSION
- 8 new Step Kinds: Receiving, Electroclean, Strike, Salt Spray,
  Adhesion Test, Hardness Test, Packaging, Tank Replenishment
- 4 new input types: photo, multi_point_thickness, bath_chemistry_panel, ph
- DEFAULT_INPUTS_BY_KIND rewritten to seed audit-grade prompts on every
  kind (bath IDs, photos, multi-point thickness, signatures, etc.)
- + Common Audit Fields one-click button on the library template form
- Default Operator Instructions relabel + alert callout

PER-RECIPE CONFIGURABILITY
- collect (Boolean) per recipe-step input prompt — opt out without delete
- collect_measurements (Boolean) master switch on recipe step — when off,
  wizard skips entirely
- template_input_id (Many2one) traceability link from recipe to library
- Recipe-step backend form view exposes the new fields with handle drag,
  toggle, target range, and library-source column

RUNTIME WIRING
- Step input wizard filters node.input_ids to step_input AND collect=True;
  short-circuits on collect_measurements=False
- New input types: photo (image widget + ir.attachment), multi-point
  thickness (5 readings + auto avg, skips empty cells), bath chemistry
  panel (pH/conc/temp/bath bundle), pH (0-14 numeric)
- Composite values JSON-serialized into value_text; photo via attachment

CoC REPORT
- Filters captured prompts to collect=True only
- Renders new input types with appropriate format

MIGRATION (post-migrate.py for 19.0.18.7.0)
- Backfills collect=True on recipe-step inputs
- Backfills collect_measurements=True on recipe steps
- Re-runs action_seed_default_inputs on every existing template
  (idempotent, preserves user edits)
- Backfills template_input_id by name-matching against source library
  template (handles JSONB vs varchar name columns)

SEED DATA
- 8 example templates (one per new kind) in fp_step_template_data.xml
  with noupdate=1

BATTLE TEST
- bt_step_library_audit.py: 29 assertions all PASS on entech

OWL EDITOR EXTENSION DEFERRED
- The simple recipe editor's per-step Instructions/Measurements
  expansions were not implemented in this pass; users configure via the
  backend recipe-step form. Track follow-up.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-29 22:13:54 -04:00
gsinghpal
a2fe1fcbcc changes 2026-04-29 03:35:33 -04:00
gsinghpal
13e300d90e changes 2026-04-28 19:39:37 -04:00
gsinghpal
0ad382e1a6 feat(phase1): top-level menu consolidation + landing-page resolver
Phase 1 collapses the Plating app's 17 top-level menus down to 6
domains (Sales, Operations, Receiving & Shipping, Quality,
Compliance, Configuration) so users no longer scroll a 17-item
sidebar to find one thing.

Re-parented (no XML id changes — bookmarks still work):
- fusion_plating_compliance.menu_fp_compliance_root
    → menu_fp_compliance_hub  (renamed 'General')
- fusion_plating_safety.menu_fp_safety_root
    → menu_fp_compliance_hub  (renamed 'Safety / WHMIS')
- fusion_plating_aerospace.menu_fp_aerospace
    → menu_fp_compliance_hub  (renamed 'Aerospace (AS9100 / Nadcap)')
- fusion_plating_nuclear.menu_fp_nuclear
    → menu_fp_compliance_hub  (renamed 'Nuclear (CSA N299 / CNSC)')
- fusion_plating_cgp.menu_fp_cgp
    → menu_fp_compliance_hub  (renamed 'Controlled Goods (CGP)')
- fusion_plating_certificates.menu_fp_certificates
    → menu_fp_quality (Certs are a Quality output, not a separate
      top-level concern)
- fusion_plating_bridge_maintenance.menu_fp_maintenance
    → menu_fp_operations
- fusion_plating.menu_fp_job_step_move (Move Log)
    → menu_fp_operations
- fusion_plating.menu_fp_job_step_timelog (Labor History)
    → menu_fp_operations

The new menu_fp_compliance_hub is supervisor-gated; underlying
verticals retain their own group locks (CGP officer, etc.).

Settings menu remains manager-gated through inheritance from
menu_fp_config (already in place).

NEW — Plating landing-page resolver:
- ir.actions.act_window.x_fc_pickable_landing  (Boolean tag for
  curated picklist; flagged on Sale Orders, Quotations, Process
  Recipes for Phase 1; more in Phase 2)
- res.company.x_fc_default_landing_action_id (admin sets fallback)
- res.users.x_fc_plating_landing_action_id (per-user override)
- ir.actions.server action_fp_resolve_plating_landing — picks
  user → company → Sale Orders fallback at click time
- menu_fp_root rewired to call the resolver
- User profile + Settings tabs surface the dropdowns

Configurator's earlier menu_fp_root override (action_fp_sale_orders
direct) removed — core's resolver now owns the routing.

Versions bumped: fusion_plating 19.0.11.0.0, configurator
19.0.17.16.0, plus 7 dependent modules patched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-27 22:33:37 -04:00
gsinghpal
cfe776be4c chore: session housekeeping — tank UX, plating menu defaults, WO label
- fusion_plating: tank field labels (Code → Tank Number, Tank → Tank Name)
  + state-control header buttons (Mark Empty/Filled/In Use/Draining/
  Maintenance/Out of Service) with chatter audit logging.
- fusion_plating_configurator: Plating app default landing screen = Sale
  Orders, while keeping menu name as 'Plating'.
- fusion_plating_jobs: SO smart-button label 'Plating Jobs' → 'WO'.

Already deployed and verified on entech earlier in the session.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-27 20:27:35 -04:00
gsinghpal
f08f328688 changes 2026-04-27 00:11:18 -04:00
gsinghpal
d9f58b9851 changes 2026-04-26 15:05:17 -04:00
gsinghpal
41d0908ade changes 2026-04-24 21:04:38 -04:00
gsinghpal
8142bd229a feat(configurator): "PO Pending" escape hatch for customers who send PO later
Customer feedback: some customers don't send their PO with the
initial order — they send it days or weeks later. The system was
blocking SO confirmation without a PO, which forced the shop to
either wait on paperwork or ask a manager for a formal override.

New estimator-level path: a "PO Pending" boolean on sale.order +
an optional "PO Expected By" date.

  * Confirm without a PO# / PO document when PO Pending is ticked.
  * action_confirm skips the hard error if po_pending OR po_override
    is set (keeps the existing manager-override path too).
  * On confirm with PO Pending, the system schedules a chase
    activity for po_expected_date (or +3 days if blank), assigned
    via mail.activity so it shows up in the sales user's activity
    list. Chatter note logged so audit is obvious.
  * Direct-order wizard: po_number and po_attachment_file become
    optional. Ticking "PO Pending" in the wizard is the trade-in;
    a help note under the toggle explains the chase behaviour.
  * Once the PO arrives, user fills in the PO# / uploads the doc,
    and turns PO Pending off — existing downstream flow resumes.

Difference from x_fc_po_override (kept):
  * PO Override = manager waiver, permanent ("handshake deal").
  * PO Pending = estimator flag, time-boxed ("customer will send it
    by Friday").

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.14.0.0
fusion_plating_invoicing    → 19.0.3.0.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 10:08:00 -04:00
gsinghpal
2d3ee03f86 fix(configurator): widen direct-order wizard via Odoo's dialog_size context
Second attempt at widening the wizard modal after the :has() CSS
approach broke layout. This time using Odoo's built-in
dialog_size mechanism — just drop 'dialog_size': 'extra-large'
into the action's context and Odoo applies its own modal-xl
class, sized for wide content. About 30% wider than the default,
which gives the 10+ line columns breathing room without any
custom CSS.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.6.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 10:01:00 -04:00
gsinghpal
d9526dc050 revert: drop fp_direct_order_wizard.scss — :has() approach broke the modal
Reverting the previous wizard-width attempt. The
`.modal-dialog:has(.o_fp_direct_order_wizard)` selector combined
with the fixed width override produced broken layout (modal no
longer rendering correctly).

Better path for widening this wizard is still TBD — the built-in
maximize icon in the modal header already lets users go full-
screen as a workaround until a safe width override lands.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.5.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 09:58:56 -04:00
gsinghpal
470c44ee5d fix(configurator): widen direct-order wizard modal so line columns breathe
User complaint: the direct-order wizard's line table was crammed —
"Primary Treatment" showed as "Primary T..." and "Serial Number"
as "Serial Nu..." at the default Odoo modal width (~992px).

Added a dedicated stylesheet that targets the wizard via a new
o_fp_direct_order_wizard class on the form element. The modal
dialog containing the wizard now opens at min(1600px, 95vw) —
wide enough for the 10+ columns (Part, Primary Treatment, Process,
Thickness, Serial Number, Qty, Unit Price, Subtotal, Part Deadline,
WO Group) to fit without truncation on typical desktop displays,
while still adapting to narrower screens.

Also nudged per-cell horizontal padding from Bootstrap's default
to 10px left/right so the columns have a bit more breathing room
inside the wider table.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.4.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 09:56:33 -04:00
gsinghpal
488b0655a7 fix(configurator): wizard gap between "Add From" buttons + force view reload
Two small fixes on the direct-order wizard:

1. User reported the Process column from the previous commit didn't
   appear on the line list. Root cause: module view definitions
   only reload on -u, not on systemctl restart. The earlier ship
   bumped the version + ran -u, but the Process column inside the
   list view required a fresh view load. Re-running -u now resolves
   it (no code change needed for that field).

2. The "+ Add From Prior SO" and "+ Add From Quotes" buttons were
   rendering edge-to-edge because their container div used the
   default Bootstrap flow (margin-right: 0). Swapped the wrapping
   div class from `mb-2` to `mb-2 d-flex gap-2` so Bootstrap lays
   the two buttons side-by-side with a consistent 0.5rem gap.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.3.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 09:25:56 -04:00
gsinghpal
381a750902 feat(configurator): direct-order line shows effective Process alongside Treatment
User asked why the direct-order wizard only showed "Primary
Treatment" and not Process — aren't they the same? They're not,
but the distinction was invisible on the order line until now.

Mental model (preserved here to keep future decisions aligned with
the user's question):

  * Primary Treatment (fp.coating.config) = "WHAT coating" (process
    type, thickness range, spec reference — the contractual
    deliverable).
  * Process (fusion.plating.process.node tree) = "HOW we make it"
    (the floor-level sequence of operations and steps that WO
    generation turns into work).

  Each coating carries a default process (recipe_id). Parts can
  override that via the Process Composer, storing a part-scoped
  clone (default_process_id on fp.part.catalog). Resolution:
  part's composed process wins; coating default is the fallback.

Added a computed read-only `effective_process_id` field on
fp.direct.order.line that displays exactly what process will drive
WO generation for the line, plus a one-line `effective_process_source`
showing whether it came from the part ("customised") or the
coating ("default"). Both surfaced on the wizard list and form so
the estimator can verify before confirming the order.

No behaviour change — this is pure visibility. WO generation still
uses the same resolution chain it did before.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.2.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 09:20:40 -04:00
gsinghpal
625f6560f1 feat(plating): split templates vs part-scoped processes + Process smart button
Two user-reported gaps:

1. The Process Recipes list was about to be flooded by part-scoped
   clones as soon as parts started carrying customised processes —
   thousands of clones would bury the handful of real shared
   templates (General Processing, Anodize, etc.).

   Fix: the main Process Recipes action now narrows to
   part_catalog_id = False so shared templates stay alone in that
   view. A sibling menu "Part Processes" (Plating → Operations →
   Part Processes) shows the inverse list — every part-cloned
   process, grouped by part — so admins can audit clones without
   cluttering the templates list.

   Search view gains two toggle filters (Shared Templates /
   Part-Scoped) and a "Group by Part" option. The node list gains
   an optional "Part" column.

   Split across modules: core owns the base search / tree / action
   (unchanged); configurator owns all the part_catalog_id-dependent
   pieces (filter extensions, list column, narrower domain,
   "Part Processes" action + menu). Keeps the dependency direction
   clean — configurator always depends on core, never the other way.

2. Added a "Process" smart button to the part form's button box.
   Shows either a green check (composed) or "None" (not yet
   composed) and opens the part-scoped Composer on click. Gives
   users one-tap access from any part form without hunting through
   the Process tab.

fusion_plating → 19.0.8.0.0
fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.1.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 08:45:24 -04:00
gsinghpal
acb406950f feat(configurator): part-scoped process name shows part id + revision
User feedback: the Process tab on fp.part.catalog was displaying a
bare template name ("General Processing"), making it impossible to
tell at a glance that the clone belonged to this specific part.

Root clone now inherits the template name with a part-identifier
suffix appended:
  "General Processing — 1234567 Rev 2"

Only the ROOT gets the suffix — child nodes keep their clean source
names so the tree-editor canvas doesn't get cluttered.

Suffix logic avoids doubling "Rev": if part.revision is already
prefixed with "Rev " (e.g. "Rev 2"), we don't prepend another one.

Post-upgrade hook backfills existing part-cloned roots that
pre-date this change so users see the new format without having
to re-compose (which would otherwise wipe their customisations).

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.0.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 08:33:07 -04:00
gsinghpal
c76bbd85eb fix(plating): Process Composer/Editor breadcrumb accumulation
Two separate issues were stacking up on the breadcrumb trail:

1. The composer was launching the tree editor with the name
   "Process Composer — …" — identical to its own label. The
   breadcrumb trail ended up showing "Process Composer / Process
   Composer" because both pages claimed the same name. Renamed the
   tree-editor instance to "Process Editor — …" so the two pages
   read distinctly.

2. Every "Back to part" click pushed a new entry onto the
   breadcrumb stack instead of resetting. After one round-trip the
   trail looked like "… / Composer / Editor / Part"; after two it
   was "… / Composer / Editor / Part / Composer / Editor / Part".
   Added clearBreadcrumbs: true to both back paths (composer's
   backToPart and tree-editor's onBackToList) so a RETURN action
   actually resets the stack.

fusion_plating → 19.0.6.2.0
fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.12.4.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 07:48:38 -04:00
gsinghpal
33e35fd213 fix(configurator): centre Process Editor button icon + make icon white
- Icon + label now share an inline-flex row with align-items: center,
  so both sit on the button's vertical midline regardless of line-
  height inheritance.
- Dedicated gap (10px) replaces the me-2 utility so the _hint block's
  .fa { margin-bottom: 16px } can't bleed in and push the icon off.
- Icon colour forced to #ffffff to match the button's white label —
  contrast against btn-primary green is now clean.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.12.3.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 07:41:24 -04:00
gsinghpal
18f45d50f5 fix(configurator): Process Composer tree-editor button polish
- Icon: fa-edit → fa-sitemap (pencil suggests inline editing; the
  button actually navigates to a separate tree editor — sitemap
  matches the intent).
- Icon spacing: swap the fragile leading-space-in-span for the
  Bootstrap me-2 utility so the icon-to-text gap is consistent.
- Label: "Open Tree Editor" → "Open Process Editor" to match the
  page title ("Process Composer") and the menu vocabulary the rest
  of the product uses.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.12.2.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 07:37:35 -04:00
gsinghpal
d0eefe6392 fix(configurator): Process Composer dark-mode palette (Sub 3 follow-up)
Process Composer was rendering a white card background on dark-mode
tenants because the SCSS relied on var(--bs-body-bg, #ffffff) — the
Bootstrap CSS variable doesn't flip reliably in Odoo 19's backend,
and the hardcoded fallback kicked in.

Rewrote with the shopfloor token pattern from CLAUDE.md: branch on
$o-webclient-color-scheme == dark at compile time, expose via CSS
custom properties (--fp-composer-card / -border / -panel / -text /
-muted), drop every --bs-* fallback for layout colours.

Cleared the ir_attachment asset cache on entech so both the backend
and web_dark bundles recompile cleanly.

fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.12.1.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 07:35:11 -04:00
gsinghpal
25c3f6f8d1 feat(plating): Sub 5 — order-line fields (serial, job#, thickness, revision)
Four new fields on every sale.order.line, propagated through to MO,
Delivery, and Invoice for end-to-end traceability:

- fp.serial registry (new model in configurator) with smart-button
  traceability to Sale Order, MO, Delivery, Invoice, Part. M2O on SO
  line; optional; user types a customer serial or clicks Generate
  Serial for a sequence-backed one. Reverse O2M links split across
  configurator (invoice) / bridge_mrp (MO) / logistics (delivery) so
  module load order is respected.
- x_fc_job_number on SO line, auto-sequenced FP-JOB-NNNNN on SO
  confirm. Editable — shops can override for customer/legacy schemes.
- fp.coating.thickness (new child of fp.coating.config) with per-
  config discrete thickness options; x_fc_thickness_id on SO line
  domain-filtered to the line's coating. Auto-clears when coating
  changes.
- x_fc_revision_snapshot Char on SO line, frozen from
  x_fc_part_catalog_id.revision at save. Protects historical SOs from
  later catalog edits. Secondary "Revision" picker on the tree view
  lets users switch between prior revisions of the same part number;
  the Part M2O still surfaces only is_latest_revision rows.

Reports (CoC, packing slip, invoice, BoL) pick up all four via the
Sub 2 customer_line_header macro — one macro edit, four reports.

Smoke on entech: 11 assertions pass including revision snapshot,
generate-serial button, typed-serial create-on-fly, coating→thickness
domain reset, SO confirm auto job#, and MO traceability carry.

Module version bumps:
  fusion_plating_configurator  → 19.0.12.0.0
  fusion_plating_bridge_mrp    → 19.0.11.0.0
  fusion_plating_logistics     → 19.0.2.0.0 (+depends configurator)
  fusion_plating_reports       → 19.0.5.1.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-22 23:04:44 -04:00
gsinghpal
3de37ea735 feat(configurator): Sub 3 Phase B — part-scoped Process Composer client action + part form Compose button
- Add fp_part_composer_controller with 3 JSON-RPC endpoints:
  /fp/part/composer/state, /fp/part/composer/templates,
  /fp/part/composer/load_template (deep-clones a shared template
  into a part-owned tree inside a cr.savepoint, sets
  fp.part.catalog.default_process_id atomically)
- _clone_subtree copies name/sequence/opt_in_out/treatment_uom plus
  description/notes/icon/color/timing/behaviour/work_center/process_type
  and stamps part_catalog_id + cloned_from_id on every node
- Add fp_part_process_composer OWL client action (JS + XML + SCSS):
  picks template from dropdown, clones, hands off to existing
  fp_recipe_tree_editor via context={recipe_id, part_id}
- Add Process tab on part form with readonly default_process_id
  field and Compose button calling action_open_part_composer
- Register new assets in web.assets_backend, bump configurator
  version to 19.0.11.0.0
2026-04-22 09:02:03 -04:00