194850e3cf5c6fbe1b2338b07b989f589717b71d
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
gsinghpal
|
d15d9e4303 |
fix(fusion_repairs): admin + office users get full read/schedule access
When admin (gsingh, uid=2) opened a repair on the dashboard:
"Sorry, Gurpreet Singh (id=2) doesn't have 'read' access to:
- Repair Order, RO-202605-04 (repair.order: 34)
Blame the following rules:
- Repair Order: Technician sees own repairs"
Root cause: per-group record rules in Odoo are OR'd within the same
model. Admin had been added directly to fusion_tasks.group_field_technician
in this database (verified via res_groups_users_rel - direct=1), so the
technician's restrictive rule ('only repairs you are assigned to') kicked
in. Until now there was no per-group rule for the Repairs Office groups
to OR against, so the restrictive rule won by default.
Fix - added two pairs of permissive rules:
rule_repair_order_repairs_user_full - User can read/write/create
rule_repair_order_repairs_manager_unlink - Manager also can delete
rule_technician_task_repairs_office - User can read/write/create tasks
rule_technician_task_repairs_manager_unlink - Manager also can delete tasks
Both have domain_force=[(1,'=',1)] so they grant unrestricted access for
the Repairs groups. OR'd with the field_technician rule, admin and other
office users now see everything. Field technicians who do NOT have any
Repairs group still see only their assigned repairs (rule unchanged).
Also added the matching ir.model.access.csv entries - record rules don't
fire if the user has no model-level ACL. This is the second fix
('office users can schedule') from the same complaint - Repairs User now
has read/write/create on fusion.technician.task; Repairs Manager also
gets unlink.
Verified end-to-end on westin-v19:
Admin can see 17 repairs (was 0 before fix)
Admin can read RO-202605-04 -> 'Gurpreet Singh' (the exact failing record)
Admin can create fusion.technician.task -> permission check passes
(model's own time-overlap business validation correctly rejects an
overlap, but that is a value error not a permission error)
Bumped to 19.0.1.0.7.
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
|
||
|
gsinghpal
|
73ee48e7c9 |
feat(fusion_repairs): Phase 3 - maintenance contracts + client self-booking
Maintenance contracts - New fusion.repair.maintenance.contract model: one per partner + product + lot. Fields: interval_months, last_service_date, next_due_date, state, booking_token (secrets.token_urlsafe), last_reminder_band (30 / 7 / 1), booking_repair_id - roll_next_due_date() advances the cycle by interval_months and resets the band / booked-repair so the next cycle starts fresh - sale.order._spawn_maintenance_contracts() creates contracts for delivered SOs whose product has x_fc_maintenance_interval_months > 0 (called from Phase 3 hooks; ready for cron / on-state change wiring) Reminder cron - Daily ir.cron at 07:00 -> cron_send_due_reminders() - Sends email at 30 / 7 / 1 day bands before next_due_date; tracks last_reminder_band so we never re-send the same band in one cycle - Master toggle via ir.config_parameter fusion_repairs.enable_email_notifications Public client booking portal - /repairs/maintenance/book/<token> GET landing page with a date input - /repairs/maintenance/book/<token>/confirm POST creates a repair.order via contract.create_repair_from_booking() (source='client_portal') - Idempotent: existing booking shows "already booked" instead of spawning a duplicate - Invalid / expired tokens render a friendly "link not valid" page Mail template - email_template_maintenance_due_reminder with 4px green accent bar, 600px max-width, dark/light safe; renders the tokenized booking CTA button directly to /repairs/maintenance/book/<token> Backend - Maintenance Contracts list / form with statusbar + chatter - Menu under Operations -> Maintenance Contracts - Sequence MC/##### for contract reference - Access rules: User read, Dispatcher write, Manager full Verified end-to-end on local westin-v19: - Contract MC/00003 created due in 7 days - cron_send_due_reminders() fires the 7-day band; second invocation skips (idempotent) - create_repair_from_booking() spawns BR-WA/RO/00014 with x_fc_intake_source='client_portal' and links it back to the contract - HTTP GET /repairs/maintenance/book/<token> -> 200 with the date input and contract reference visible in the page Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |
||
|
gsinghpal
|
7727745b73 |
feat(fusion_repairs): Phase 2 - service catalogue, visit report, warranty, Poynt
Service catalogue - New fusion.repair.service.catalog model: named service entries per equipment category with symptom keywords, estimated hours / cost, default parts, auto_schedule flag, optional pricelist override - find_best_match() scores candidates by symptom-keyword overlap against intake text hints (issue summary + category + notes) - Intake service wires it in: on submit, the matcher sets x_fc_service_catalog_id + x_fc_estimated_duration + x_fc_estimated_cost and (when auto_schedule=True) creates a draft dispatch task - Double-task guard: if catalogue match already created a task, the urgency-based dispatch skips so we never duplicate Visit report wizard - fusion.repair.visit.report.wizard with labour hours + parts lines + technician notes + 'found another issue' branch - Computes actual cost = (labour x service_product.list_price) + parts - Compares against estimate -> sets requires_requote when variance exceeds configured threshold (% or $); shows warning banner inline - On confirm: writes actuals back to repair, posts notes to chatter, optionally spawns a follow-up repair (T5 'found another issue') Repair warranty - New fusion.repair.warranty.coverage model (start/expiry, partner, product, lot, active flag) - find_active_for(partner, product, lot) returns the most-recent active coverage - Intake service auto-checks: when a new repair lands on an equipment that has active warranty coverage, posts a chatter banner so the office knows the work may be free under our 30/90-day re-do policy (manager review still required; never auto-zeros pricing) Repair form - Header: Visit Report + Collect Payment buttons (gated by group) - action_collect_payment looks up the linked posted unpaid invoice on the repair SO and opens the Poynt wizard (action_open_poynt_payment_wizard) AI intake summary - _generate_ai_summary calls self.env['fusion.api.service'].call_openai with consumer='fusion_repairs', feature='intake_triage' - Strict system prompt: no medical advice, no diagnoses, no recommending stop equipment use; ~80 words; plain English - Try/fallback per fusion-api-integration.mdc: if fusion_api not installed or call fails -> silently skip; intake never blocked Verified end-to-end on local westin-v19: - Stairlift motor intake -> catalogue match -> estimated $500/2h -> auto dispatch task (count=1, not duplicated) - Visit report: 2.5h x $250 + $100 parts = $725 actual vs $500 estimated = 45% variance -> requires_requote=True - Warranty: 30-day coverage on the completed repair; second repair on same partner triggers warranty banner in chatter Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |
||
|
gsinghpal
|
429084e0bf |
feat(fusion_repairs): Phase 1 MVP - backend intake wizard + core models
Scaffolds the fusion_repairs module that extends Odoo 19 repair.order with a guided medical-equipment intake workflow. Models - fusion.repair.product.category (8 medical equipment categories seeded) - fusion.repair.intake.template / .question / .answer (7 templates, 32 questions seeded across hospital bed, stairlift, porch lift, wheelchair, walker/rollator, mattress) - fusion.repair.intake.service (AbstractModel) - single entry point used by backend wizard, sales rep portal, and public client portal so all three surfaces produce identical outcomes - repair.order extensions (x_fc_intake_*, x_fc_third_party_equipment, x_fc_photo_ids, x_fc_urgency, x_fc_estimated/actual_cost, AI summary) - fusion.technician.task back-link (x_fc_repair_order_id) - res.partner service preferences (preferred tech, time window, access notes) - res.users repair extensions (skills, cost rate, on-call rotation fields) - res.config.settings for variance thresholds, portal URL, rate limit UI - Backend intake wizard with multi-equipment loop, third-party flag, photos - repair.order form: Intake tab, Photos, Pricing tab, AI tab, smart buttons (technician tasks, intake answers, original SO) - Kanban + list view urgency badges - Fusion Repairs app menu (New Service Call, Repair Orders, Config) Activities & Email - 4 follow-up activity types (CS callback, tech dispatch, visit follow-up, manager review) with urgency-tiered deadlines - 2 mail templates (client confirmation + office notification) with the same dark/light-safe styling as fusion_claims ADP templates Security - New res.groups.privilege + 3 groups (User, Dispatcher, Manager) - Reuses fusion_tasks.group_field_technician (do NOT recreate) - Reuses fusion_authorizer_portal.group_sales_rep_portal - Multi-company global rule + technician scoping rule on repair.order Verified end-to-end on local westin-v19 dev DB via odoo-shell - creates multiple repairs in one session, auto-creates dispatch task for urgent, attaches 4 activity types correctly per urgency tier and third-party flag. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com> |