3e92a8318d19facd21e00d784667cf2cdbbca00a
8 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
gsinghpal
|
41d0908ade | changes | ||
|
gsinghpal
|
8142bd229a |
feat(configurator): "PO Pending" escape hatch for customers who send PO later
Customer feedback: some customers don't send their PO with the
initial order — they send it days or weeks later. The system was
blocking SO confirmation without a PO, which forced the shop to
either wait on paperwork or ask a manager for a formal override.
New estimator-level path: a "PO Pending" boolean on sale.order +
an optional "PO Expected By" date.
* Confirm without a PO# / PO document when PO Pending is ticked.
* action_confirm skips the hard error if po_pending OR po_override
is set (keeps the existing manager-override path too).
* On confirm with PO Pending, the system schedules a chase
activity for po_expected_date (or +3 days if blank), assigned
via mail.activity so it shows up in the sales user's activity
list. Chatter note logged so audit is obvious.
* Direct-order wizard: po_number and po_attachment_file become
optional. Ticking "PO Pending" in the wizard is the trade-in;
a help note under the toggle explains the chase behaviour.
* Once the PO arrives, user fills in the PO# / uploads the doc,
and turns PO Pending off — existing downstream flow resumes.
Difference from x_fc_po_override (kept):
* PO Override = manager waiver, permanent ("handshake deal").
* PO Pending = estimator flag, time-boxed ("customer will send it
by Friday").
fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.14.0.0
fusion_plating_invoicing → 19.0.3.0.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
gsinghpal
|
bee5ba4d3f |
fix(plating): UAT-caught UX annoyances + lurking bugs
Five fixes from the end-to-end UAT debrief: 1. Menu discoverability (HIGH) Added a prominent "+ New Direct Order" button in the Sale Orders list header toolbar (class=btn-primary, display=always). The existing menuitem at Plating > Sales > New Direct Order was buried in a submenu that didn't always expand; the toolbar button is a guaranteed entry point from the most common screen. 2. Escape/X destroys wizard state (HIGH) Added a prominent info banner at the top of the wizard form: "Changes are not saved until you click Create & Confirm Order. Closing this window (Esc or X) discards your entries." The Cancel button now has confirm="Discard this order? All header data and line items will be lost." so the intentional-cancel path also prompts. 3. Shell/cron crash in _fp_auto_create_mo (MEDIUM) bridge_mrp/models/sale_order.py:232-264 used _() inside list comprehensions to format the internal chatter summary of newly created / adopted MOs. _() resolves language from env.context, which is empty in odoo-shell and cron contexts — triggering a translate.get_text_alias crash AFTER the MOs had been created. These strings are internal audit log text, not user-facing UI; dropped the _() wrappers so the message builds safely from any context. Same for the per-group error-message on savepoint rollback. 4. Misleading "100%" margin (MEDIUM) x_fc_margin_percent displayed 100% on every SO because the cost rollup from fp.coating.config.unit_cost isn't populated yet. Added x_fc_margin_available Boolean (True only when at least one line's coating has a non-zero unit_cost). The SO Plating tab now hides the margin numbers when margin_available=False and shows an inline muted note: "Margin n/a — coating cost rollup not yet populated on any line's treatment." 5. Account Hold banner too loud (LOW) fusion_plating_invoicing was injecting a full-height danger alert above every SO header. Slimmed it to a one-line compact alert with icon: "Account Hold — SO confirmation, invoicing and shipping are blocked for non-managers." Half the vertical footprint, less visual competition with the Plating chip bar. Verified via UAT on S00071. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
gsinghpal
|
11837ed4f5 |
fix(plating): Manager Desk premature-advance + 6 workflow enforcement gates
**1. Manager Desk: WO no longer jumps to "In Progress" on partial setup**
User-reported bug: when the manager picked a worker, the WO immediately
left the "Unassigned" column even though the bath/tank (or oven, rack,
masking material) wasn't set yet. Worker would see a half-set job in
their queue and couldn't start it.
Fix:
- New compute `mrp.workorder.x_fc_is_release_ready` — True only when
every field button_start would block on is filled in.
- Companion `x_fc_missing_for_release` — comma-list of what's still
missing (used by the UI as a hint chip).
- Manager controller swaps the column filter from
`assigned_user_id == False` to `is_release_ready == False`.
- A WO stays in "Setup Pending" (formerly Unassigned) until BOTH
worker + per-kind equipment are set; only then does it move to
"In Progress".
**Manager Desk template + SCSS**
The user also said "the manager doesn't know what task they're
assigning". WO row now shows:
• Colour-coded WO-kind badge (wet=blue, bake=red, mask=yellow,
rack=grey, inspect=green)
• Required-role icon + name
• Bath / oven / rack / masking-material chips (whatever's set)
• Yellow "Needs: ..." chip listing what's still missing
• Tank picker only shows for wet WOs (no point on a mask WO)
• Open-WO button to drill into the form for advanced edits
**2. Six enforcement gates patched (without breaking the workflow)**
Each gate fires AFTER the manager sets up the WO and the operator
hits Start/Finish — never on create — so the manager → worker → run
flow stays intact.
| # | Gate | Where |
|---|---|---|
| a | SO confirm requires `client_order_ref` (or x_fc_po_number) | sale_order.action_confirm |
| b | Cert issue requires thickness readings (when partner.x_fc_strict_thickness_required) | fp_certificate.action_issue |
| c | Delivery start_route requires assigned_driver_id | fp_delivery.action_start_route |
| d | Bath log create/save requires line_ids (no empty logs) | fp_bath_log create + @api.constrains |
| e | Quality hold: hold_reason + description now `required=True` | fp_quality_hold field schema |
| f | Receiving accept blocks qty mismatch (manager override allowed + logged) | fp_receiving.action_accept |
New partner flag `x_fc_strict_thickness_required` so commercial
customers don't get blocked but aerospace customers do.
**Verified** via `scripts/fp_enforcement_audit.py`: 18/22 ENFORCED
(2 "GAPS" + 2 "ERRs" are all test artifacts — admin bypass + NOT NULL
fires before my custom check; real gates are correct).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
gsinghpal
|
c118b7c6b5 |
feat(plating): close compliance gaps 7-9 — NCR + CAPA + discharge + invoice ref
**7a. NCR close gate** (fusion.plating.ncr.action_close) Block close unless these are filled in: • Description (what happened) • Containment Actions (immediate response) • Root Cause (why it happened) • Disposition (use-as-is / rework / scrap / RTV decision) A closed NCR without these is useless for AS9100 audits — it's the entire point of an NCR to document what went wrong, why, and how we responded. Empty-HTML strings like "<p><br></p>" are detected as empty too. **7b. CAPA close gate** (fusion.plating.capa.action_close) Block close unless: • Root Cause Analysis filled in • Action Plan filled in • Verification (date + verifier) recorded • Effectiveness Notes filled when CAPA was marked Not Effective AS9100 §10.2 / Nadcap require evidence of root-cause analysis, the corrective/preventive action plan, AND that effectiveness was verified before the loop is closed. **8. Invoice ref defensive default** (account.move.create) Auto-fills `ref` from the source SO's client_order_ref or x_fc_po_number when the invoice is created with invoice_origin set but no ref. Already populated on the SO confirm path; this catches manually-created invoices that would otherwise miss it. Customer AP teams reject invoices that don't quote their PO# back. **9. Discharge sample close gate** (fusion.plating.discharge.sample.action_close) Block close unless: • Lab Report # set • Results Received Date set • At least one parameter reading on file • Lab certificate/report attached Without lab evidence the record fails any environmental compliance audit — the whole point is to document the test was performed and what the lab said. **Simulator** (scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py) Adds 4 new negative tests (Test 8-11), all wrapped in savepoints: ✓ Test 8 : NCR close without RC/containment/disposition → blocked ✓ Test 9 : CAPA close without analysis/plan/verification → blocked ✓ Test 10: Discharge sample close without lab evidence → blocked ✓ Test 11: Invoice ref auto-fills from SO.client_order_ref → asserted **Final E2E**: 52 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL out of 54 checks. Both remaining WARNs are expected (bake-window auto-create, first-piece gate — coating-driven, this coating doesn't trigger them). 11 negative tests in total now, every gate fires when triggered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
gsinghpal
|
db8b79d22e |
feat(plating): close 6 compliance gaps from required-fields audit
Following the workforce-E2E + required-fields audit, ship the first 6 high-priority gates so critical workflow + compliance fields can no longer be left empty by accident. **1. Invoice payment terms (account.move)** - create() now auto-inherits `invoice_payment_term_id` from partner.property_payment_term_id when missing - action_post() raises UserError if still missing — accountant must pick one before posting (prevents silent "immediate" due-date) **2. MO facility (mrp.production)** - action_confirm() auto-derives `x_fc_facility_id` if unset, in order: SO override → res.company.x_fc_default_facility_id → first active facility — then HARD GATES: raises UserError if still empty. Without facility every downstream record (WO, batch, bath log, cert) is missing the "where" half of the audit trail. **3. WO facility (mrp.workorder)** - Switched `x_fc_facility_id` from related (workcenter only) to a proper compute that falls back to production_id.x_fc_facility_id. Stub workcenters auto-created from process node names usually have no facility — the MO always does (from #2 above). **4. Thickness reading calibration_std (fp.thickness.reading)** - `calibration_std_ref` is now `required=True` with sensible default ("NiP/Al STD SET SN 100174568"). Nadcap mandates which calibration standard the gauge was checked against — without it the cert data has no chain back to a metrology record. **5. Delivery POD gate (fusion.plating.delivery)** - action_mark_delivered() raises UserError if no `pod_id`. Driver must capture POD on the iPad (recipient signature + photos + notes) BEFORE marking delivered. Without POD there's no signed receipt to back the invoice or defend a delivery dispute. **6. Certificate spec_reference gate (fp.certificate)** - action_issue() raises UserError if no `spec_reference`. The cert ATTESTS to a spec — leaving it blank produces a piece of paper that AS9100 / Nadcap auditors will (rightfully) reject. **Simulator updated**: scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py - Sets net-30 on the test customer + ensures a default facility - New PHASE 4c: 5 negative tests (one per new gate), each wrapped in a SAVEPOINT so SQL constraint violations don't abort the txn - Driver now creates POD on iPad BEFORE marking delivered **Final E2E**: 48 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL out of 50 checks. The 2 remaining WARNs (bake-window auto-create, first-piece gate) are expected behaviour — both are coating-driven and the test coating intentionally doesn't trigger them. All 7 negative tests now pass: ✓ Test 1: WO start without operator → blocked ✓ Test 2: WO start on wet WO without bath/tank → blocked ✓ Test 3: MO confirm without facility → blocked ✓ Test 4: Cert issue without spec_reference → blocked ✓ Test 5: Delivery delivered without POD → blocked ✓ Test 6: Invoice post without payment terms → blocked ✓ Test 7: Thickness reading without cal std → blocked (DB NOT NULL) Audit script (scripts/fp_required_fields_audit.py) committed too — it's the diagnostic that surfaced these gaps and can be re-run to catch new ones. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
gsinghpal
|
a623c6684d |
fix(fusion_plating): bug review fixes + progress/net-terms invoicing + formal CoC rebuild
Bug review fixes (found by code review + live QWeb error):
- report_fp_sale.xml: product_uom → product_uom_id (Odoo 19 renamed;
was raising KeyError during PDF render, blocking all sale-order prints)
- mrp_production.button_mark_done: add idempotency guard on delivery
auto-create (was duplicating on every re-close)
- fp.certificate._compute_batch_ids: use empty recordset instead of
False for Many2many computed fields
- fp_notification_template._collect_attachments: collapse attach_quotation
+ attach_sale_order into a single render so email doesn't double-attach
the same PDF
- fp.operator.certification: SQL unique on computed state was unreliable;
added explicit `revoked` boolean, made state pure-compute, replaced
SQL constraint with @api.constrains that checks active-only uniqueness;
has_active_cert now reads revoked + expires_date directly (no stale
stored state between nightly recomputes)
Two missing invoice strategies implemented + 1 pre-existing deposit bug fix:
- Progress Billing: new x_fc_progress_initial_percent field on sale.order;
_create_progress_initial_invoice bills the configured % on SO confirm
via down-payment wizard, _create_final_balance_invoice bills the
remainder on delivery
- Net Terms: no invoice on confirm; full invoice auto-created when
fusion.plating.delivery.action_mark_delivered fires
- Fix for deposit (pre-existing, silent): sale.advance.payment.inv
reads active_ids at wizard-create time, not on create_invoices();
context was being set on the wrong call, so every deposit attempt
raised "Expected singleton" and message-posted to chatter instead
of actually invoicing
- New fusion_plating_invoicing/models/fp_delivery.py hooks
action_mark_delivered to dispatch final invoice for progress/net_terms
- fp.direct.order.wizard + SO form surface the progress_initial_percent
field (conditional on strategy)
Report styling cleanup:
- Hide DISCOUNT column from sale + invoice landscape reports unless at
least one line has a non-zero discount; colspan auto-adjusts
- Replace hardcoded #0066a1 in all reports with company.primary_color
driven by doc.company_id → company → user.company_id fallback chain,
with #1d1f1e as ultimate fallback; new .fp-header-primary class
exposes the colour for inline section headers (CARGO DESCRIPTION,
PAYMENT DETAILS, OPERATOR SIGN-OFF, etc.) so they retint with the
company theme without template edits
Certificate of Conformance — formal ENTECH-style rebuild:
- New res.company fields: x_fc_owner_user_id (default signer, sig from
hr.employee.signature), x_fc_coc_signature_override (manual upload),
x_fc_{nadcap,as9100,cgp}_logo + _active toggles for accreditation
badges
- New res.config.settings section "Fusion Plating" exposing the above
as configurable blocks; manager-only menu under Configuration →
Fusion Plating Settings
- New fp.certificate fields: nc_quantity, customer_job_no,
contact_partner_id (child contact for Name / Email / Phone block)
- New report_coc_en + report_coc_fr templates (primary): custom header
(company contact | accreditations | company logo), bilingual labels
per variant, customer info block with customer logo, 3-column cert
info table, 6-column line-item table (Part # | Process | Customer
PO | Shipped | NC Qty | Customer Job No.), signature image + bordered
certification statement, footer "Fusion Plating by Nexa Systems"
- Legacy report_coc + report_coc_portrait kept for existing portal-job
bindings (no behaviour change)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
gsinghpal
|
7c7ef06057 | folder rename |