Two bugs fixed in one drop, both targeting the contract review (QA-005)
enforcement gap reported on entech.
## Bug 1 — WO step routed to wrong wizard
Symptom: clicking Finish & Next or Record on a Contract Review step in
WH/JOB/00339 opened the generic measurement wizard with three fake
prompts (Reviewer Initials / Date Reviewed / QA-005 Approved). No path
to the actual QA-005 form from the work order.
Root cause: action_finish_and_advance + action_open_input_wizard had no
branch for recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'. The step.kind
mapping collapses contract_review -> 'other' so kind-based detection
wouldn't have worked either; gate has to live at the recipe-node layer.
Fix in fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py (v19.0.8.14.6):
- action_finish_and_advance:329 calls _fp_contract_review_redirect
before the input-wizard branch
- action_open_input_wizard:844 same gate, keeps Record button consistent
- _fp_contract_review_redirect:866 (new) returns the part's
action_start_contract_review() unless review.state in
(complete, dismissed) — gate clears so the step can finish after
the operator signs QA-005.
## Bug 2 — Part create did not enforce contract review
Symptom: spec called for a banner-only UX. User wanted true automatic
enforcement on first part creation under an enforced customer.
Fix in fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_part_catalog.py (v19.0.4.10.0):
- @api.model_create_multi def create() override
- _fp_enforce_contract_review_on_create() helper auto-stages the
fp.contract.review record AND surfaces three prominent reminders:
1. Sticky bus.bus warning toast (top-right, doesn't auto-dismiss)
2. mail.activity (To Do) on the part for the current user
3. Smart button on the part form lights up (review now exists)
- Idempotent: skips parts that already carry a review id
- Soft-fails: bus or activity outage doesn't block part creation
- create()-only — write/update flows never re-trigger
Sub 4's existing info banner stays as a fourth surface.
## Tests
- fusion_plating_jobs/tests/test_fp_job_extensions.py:
+TestContractReviewStepRouting (5 tests covering both routing methods,
the complete/dismissed gate-clear, and non-CR step regression)
- fusion_plating_quality/tests/test_part_catalog_contract_review_enforcement.py
(NEW): 9 tests covering auto-create, batch create, idempotency,
activity surface, bus surface, write-must-not-retrigger, soft-fail.
- docs/superpowers/tests/2026-04-22-sub4-smoke.py: flipped the
"no review yet" assertion to "review auto-created" to match new
behavior. Sign-flow assertions unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- New bulk-toggle actions on fp.contract.review flip all 10 checklist
items in Section 2.0 (and all 11 in Section 3.0) in one click.
Rendered as "Check All" / "Clear All" buttons above each checklist.
User can still tick boxes individually. Buttons hide once the
section is signed (locked).
- Fix QA-005 PDF: replaced `to_text(...)` (not in QWeb context) with
`image_data_uri(...)` for the company logo embed. PDF now renders
with the full colour ENTECH logo (render size 103 KB).
- Smoke test extended: 5 new assertions covering bulk-toggle on/off
and locked-section guard. 17/17 pass on entech.
fusion_plating_quality → 19.0.2.1.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per-part contract review record (fp.contract.review) gated by a
customer-level toggle, signed in two sections (QA Assistant → QA
Manager), settings-based signer rosters (no new res.groups), banner on
the part form that auto-dismisses once the first MO for the part hits
confirmed. QA-005 Rev. 0 paper form reproduced 1:1 in a QWeb PDF.
Never blocks MO/SO/WO — review is purely an audit artefact.
Smoke test run on entech: 12 assertions pass including the 25-cell
risk matrix parity with the paper form and 22 KB PDF render.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
