Reported 2026-05-20: the receiving state machine had four states
(draft → counted → staged → closed) where the middle pair was pure
ceremony. Real-usage data on entech:
state distribution: 14 draft, 4 closed (zero `staged` records)
median dwell counted → staged: 11 seconds
median dwell staged → closed: 4 minutes
`staged` captured no fields, fired no gates, mapped to the same SO
`x_fc_receiving_status='partial'` as `counted`. Pure click-through.
Cleanup:
- State Selection retains `staged` as `Staged (legacy)` so historical
records remain readable; new transitions never write it.
- statusbar_visible drops it from the chevron header.
- action_mark_staged becomes a thin shim that advances counted →
closed directly (any old button binding still works).
- action_close now accepts `counted` as a valid source state (was
previously only `staged` / legacy `accepted` / `resolved`).
- View: "Stage for Racking" button removed. "Close" button renamed
to "Close — Racking Confirmed" so the racking-crew confirmation
meaning stays obvious.
- _update_so_receiving_status mapping unchanged for legacy `staged`
(still maps to partial) — only the comment block updated to
describe the new canonical flow.
Migration 19.0.3.20.0 advances any `staged` records to `closed`
and syncs the linked SO's x_fc_receiving_status to `received` so
downstream gates (job step start, mark_done qty check, cert
creation) don't see a stale "partial" status.
Module: fusion_plating_receiving 19.0.3.19.0 → 19.0.3.20.0.
Tests: TestQtyReceivedPropagation updated — 5 tests dropped the
action_mark_staged() call, walk draft → counted → closed directly.
All 11 tests green (carrier 6 + propagation 5).
Verified on entech: existing 14 draft + 4 closed records untouched.
Direct draft → counted → closed transition works end-to-end on
RCV-30041 (was the test target).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bug surfaced on WO-30043 (2026-05-20): operator walked every step
including a fully closed receiving record, then hit
"Quantity Received is blank — close the receiving record for
SO SO-30043 before completing this job." Receiving WAS closed.
Root cause: the 2026-05-18 cert-creation gate
(fp.job.button_mark_done) blocks on job.qty_received but nothing
populated it. fp.receiving carried the qty on its line records,
fp.job stayed at 0 indefinitely. Two disconnected records on the
same SO.
Fix: when fp.receiving._update_so_receiving_status runs (i.e. on
every state transition — counted / staged / closed / accepted /
resolved), also mirror each line's received_qty onto the matching
fp.job by (sale_order_id + part_catalog_id). Single-part SOs map
1-to-1; multi-part SOs spawn one job per line so the same join
still works.
Two defensive guards in the hook:
- Skip silently when fusion_plating_jobs not installed
(Job = env.get('fp.job') returns None).
- Skip silently when fp.job doesn't yet carry part_catalog_id /
qty_received (test scope, unusual install topology).
Drive-by during cleanup:
- fp_parent_numbered_mixin._fp_assign_parent_name: guard
so.x_fc_parent_number access with field-existence check. The
column lives in fusion_plating_jobs; downstream modules that
inherit the mixin (receiving) but don't depend on jobs were
hitting AttributeError on every fp.receiving.create at test
time. Falls through to the legacy sequence when the column
isn't there.
- fp_receiving_views.xml: legacy carrier_name Char field rendered
as a second carrier row labeled "Legacy Carrier" alongside the
proper x_fc_carrier_id M2O — operators saw two carrier fields
and got confused. Hide the legacy display (data stays in DB for
audit; migration 19.0.3.10.0 already matched it to a real
delivery.carrier).
Migration 19.0.3.19.0/post-migrate.py backfills qty_received from
closed receiving lines for any job stuck at 0 — fixes WO-30043
and two sibling jobs on entech.
Modules: fusion_plating 19.0.20.2.0, fusion_plating_receiving
19.0.3.19.0, fusion_plating_jobs 19.0.10.15.0.
All 19 tests green (TestCarrierFields 6, TestQtyReceivedPropagation 5
new, TestReceivingGate 8). Direct verification on entech: WO-30043
qty_received = 1, mark_done succeeds, delivery + cert auto-created.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per-model counter fields on sale.order renamed to x_fc_pn_*_count
to avoid collision with pre-existing compute fields of the same
short name in bridge_mrp / receiving / configurator (silent
compute-override was suppressing the storage). 4 child models
(fp.certificate, fp.receiving, fusion.plating.delivery,
fusion.plating.pickup.request) now derive names as PFX-<parent>
with -NN suffix from the 2nd onward.
fusion.plating.pickup.request gains a sale_order_id field
(optional) so pickups created against an SO get parent-derived
names, while standalone pickups (pre-SO) fall back to PU/YYYY/NNNN.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
fp.receiving simplifies to box-count-only (new primary state
machine: draft → counted → staged → closed). Legacy
inspecting/accepted/discrepancy/resolved states stay in the
Selection so existing records load without error but are surfaced
behind a manager-only toggle. New box_count_in field + banner
that tells the receiver "count boxes only — parts are inspected
by the racking crew."
New fp.racking.inspection + fp.racking.inspection.line models —
one record per MO, auto-created by mrp.production.create() with
one line per contributing SO line (qty_expected seeded, qty_found
+ condition filled in by the racking crew when they open the boxes).
State: draft → inspecting → done | discrepancy_flagged (flagged
when any line has a non-ok condition or qty variance). Reopen
restricted to Plating Manager.
WO soft gate: first plating WO button_start raises a UserError
when the MO's racking inspection is still Draft or Inspecting.
Plating Manager bypasses; later WOs are not gated.
fp.delivery gains x_fc_box_count_out. action_mark_delivered calls
_fp_check_box_parity which posts a non-blocking chatter warning
when boxes out ≠ boxes in (resolved via job_ref → MO.origin → SO
→ receiving). Warning only — never blocks shipping.
Menu entry: Plating → Operations → Racking Inspection.
Module version bumps:
fusion_plating_receiving → 19.0.3.0.0
fusion_plating_logistics → 19.0.3.0.0
fusion_plating_bridge_mrp → 19.0.12.0.0 (+depends receiving)
Smoke on entech: 12/12 assertions pass (one gate test skipped —
MO had no WOs to test) including box-count state machine, inspection
auto-create, lifecycle, discrepancy flag, and box-parity chatter.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
**1. Manager Desk: WO no longer jumps to "In Progress" on partial setup**
User-reported bug: when the manager picked a worker, the WO immediately
left the "Unassigned" column even though the bath/tank (or oven, rack,
masking material) wasn't set yet. Worker would see a half-set job in
their queue and couldn't start it.
Fix:
- New compute `mrp.workorder.x_fc_is_release_ready` — True only when
every field button_start would block on is filled in.
- Companion `x_fc_missing_for_release` — comma-list of what's still
missing (used by the UI as a hint chip).
- Manager controller swaps the column filter from
`assigned_user_id == False` to `is_release_ready == False`.
- A WO stays in "Setup Pending" (formerly Unassigned) until BOTH
worker + per-kind equipment are set; only then does it move to
"In Progress".
**Manager Desk template + SCSS**
The user also said "the manager doesn't know what task they're
assigning". WO row now shows:
• Colour-coded WO-kind badge (wet=blue, bake=red, mask=yellow,
rack=grey, inspect=green)
• Required-role icon + name
• Bath / oven / rack / masking-material chips (whatever's set)
• Yellow "Needs: ..." chip listing what's still missing
• Tank picker only shows for wet WOs (no point on a mask WO)
• Open-WO button to drill into the form for advanced edits
**2. Six enforcement gates patched (without breaking the workflow)**
Each gate fires AFTER the manager sets up the WO and the operator
hits Start/Finish — never on create — so the manager → worker → run
flow stays intact.
| # | Gate | Where |
|---|---|---|
| a | SO confirm requires `client_order_ref` (or x_fc_po_number) | sale_order.action_confirm |
| b | Cert issue requires thickness readings (when partner.x_fc_strict_thickness_required) | fp_certificate.action_issue |
| c | Delivery start_route requires assigned_driver_id | fp_delivery.action_start_route |
| d | Bath log create/save requires line_ids (no empty logs) | fp_bath_log create + @api.constrains |
| e | Quality hold: hold_reason + description now `required=True` | fp_quality_hold field schema |
| f | Receiving accept blocks qty mismatch (manager override allowed + logged) | fp_receiving.action_accept |
New partner flag `x_fc_strict_thickness_required` so commercial
customers don't get blocked but aerospace customers do.
**Verified** via `scripts/fp_enforcement_audit.py`: 18/22 ENFORCED
(2 "GAPS" + 2 "ERRs" are all test artifacts — admin bypass + NOT NULL
fires before my custom check; real gates are correct).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
E2E test (quote → SO → MO → WOs → ship → invoice → payment) ran clean
but flagged five gaps where the operator was filling in data the
system already knew. Closes all five.
#1 SO CONFIRM → AUTO-CREATE DRAFT MO (was a workflow blocker)
bridge_mrp/sale_order.py: action_confirm() override + new
_fp_auto_create_mo helper. Resolves the manufactured product from
the configurator's part-catalog → coating-config → FP-WIDGET
fallback; resolves the recipe from coating_config.recipe_id →
part_catalog.recipe_id → first installed recipe. Idempotent:
skips if any MO already exists for the SO. Errors are caught and
chatter-posted so SO confirm never fails because of an MO glitch.
#2 QUOTE PO → client_order_ref ON SO (one-line fix)
configurator/fp_quote_configurator.py: action_create_quotation
now copies po_number_preliminary into Odoo's standard
client_order_ref alongside the existing custom x_fc_po_number.
Portal pages, native reports, and integrations all read the
standard field; no reason both shouldn't carry the same PO#.
#3 MO DONE → AUTO-RENDER CoC + THICKNESS PDFs
bridge_mrp/mrp_production.py button_mark_done now calls a new
_fp_generate_cert_pdf helper after creating each fp.certificate.
Renders fusion_plating_reports.action_report_coc to PDF, stores
as ir.attachment, links to cert.attachment_id, AND cross-links
to portal_job.coc_attachment_id + delivery.coc_attachment_id so
the customer portal and the shipping email both find it without
an extra step. Thickness report falls back to the CoC layout
(which embeds thickness data) until a dedicated report ships.
Errors are logged but never block MO completion.
#4 RECEIVING received_qty PREFILL
receiving/fp_receiving.py: create() prefills received_qty from
expected_qty on draft. Operator only types when the count is
wrong (the rare case). Field carrier_tracking already exists,
so #4's 'no inbound tracking field' from the gap report turned
out to be a false alarm.
#5 DELIVERY scheduled_date + driver PREFILL
bridge_mrp/mrp_production.py: new _fp_build_delivery_vals
helper sets scheduled_date from the portal job's target_ship_date
(or now+2 business days as a sane fallback) and auto-picks
assigned_driver_id from clocked-in employees tagged is_driver
(falls back to any active driver if the shift is empty). The
outbound tracking_ref deliberately stays empty — that's the
carrier's number, paste it in once UPS/FedEx accepts the package.
Module bumps: configurator 19.0.5.0.0, bridge_mrp 19.0.5.0.0,
receiving 19.0.2.0.0.
Verified on entech: re-ran the E2E test against a fresh quote.
Quote → SO populated client_order_ref, SO confirm auto-created MO,
receiving prefilled received_qty=50, MO done generated CERT-00018.pdf
and linked it to portal job + delivery, delivery's scheduled_date
prefilled to 2026-04-29, full pipeline ended with portal job state
'complete'. The remaining 'gaps' in the static report are script
artefacts (e.g. it flags 'no inbound tracking field' but the field
exists; flags 'no driver auto-pick' but the demo data has zero
drivers tagged is_driver=True).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
