Commit Graph

22 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
gsinghpal
7b90f210b9 feat(fusion_plating): kind.area_kind drives Shop Floor column routing
Add required area_kind Selection to fp.step.kind so each kind
self-declares which plant-view column its steps belong in. Replaces
the hardcoded _STEP_KIND_TO_AREA dict (removed in fp_job_step.py
in the follow-up commit).

- New `blast` kind for the Blasting column (sequence=35)
- 26 existing kind records seeded with area_kind in XML
- Pre-migrate 19.0.21.2.0 seeds existing rows BEFORE NOT NULL hits
  the schema; also activates derack/demask/gating that were
  deactivated in 19.0.20.6.0 but are needed for the full taxonomy
- Step Kind form + list views surface area_kind (badge + chip)
- Step Kind search adds Group By Shop Floor Column
- Simple Editor kind picker shows "Masking — Masking column"
  suffix so authors see the routing at pick time
- Add Hot Water Porosity Test (A-15) + Final Inspection / Packaging
  templates (used by 7+3 recipe nodes that previously had no
  library entry)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 17:02:02 -04:00
gsinghpal
ac1db177e1 feat(step-kinds): curate to 11 + mandatory + admin-only creation
Operator-reported foot-gun: Step Kind dropdown had 24 options, most
of which were visual-only (cleaning, electroclean, etch, rinse,
strike, dry, wbf_test, hardness_test, adhesion_test, salt_spray,
packaging, etc.) and didn't drive any gate or milestone. Picking the
wrong one meant nothing happened; picking Generic (left default)
meant nothing happened. Authors couldn't tell which choice mattered.

Curation: 24 → 11 active kinds. Each remaining kind has a concrete
downstream behaviour (gate, portal milestone, hardware tie-in, or
"explicitly no behaviour" for Other):

  other            Other (catch-all, default — no special behaviour)
  receiving        Received portal milestone
  contract_review  QA-005 form gate + button_finish lock
  racking          Rack-assignment dialog + button_finish lock
  mask             Visual mask kind (covers Masking + De-Masking)
  wet_process      Visual wet kind (NEW, covers cleaning, rinse,
                   etch, strike, dry, electroclean, wbf_test)
  plate            Plated portal milestone (last plate step closes)
  bake             Bake-window state machine + Baked milestone
  inspect          Intermediate inspection milestone
  final_inspect    Inspected (terminal) portal milestone
  ship             Shipped milestone (back-compat; delivery-state
                   driven is preferred)

Retired kinds (active=False, hidden from dropdown): cleaning,
electroclean, etch, rinse, strike, dry, wbf_test, demask, derack,
replenishment, hardness_test, adhesion_test, salt_spray, packaging,
gating. Kept in DB for audit / history but not selectable.

Mandatory enforcement:
- fp.step.kind_id on fusion.plating.process.node and fp.step.template
  is now required=True with ondelete='restrict' and a default that
  resolves to the 'other' kind. Existing NULL rows are backfilled by
  the pre-migrate before the NOT NULL constraint hits the schema.
- Dropdown no longer offers a blank / "Generic" option. New steps
  land on 'other' instead of NULL.

Admin-only catalog:
- /fp/simple_recipe/kinds/create endpoint now refuses requests from
  non-managers (group_fusion_plating_manager). Returns a clear
  message explaining why ("each kind drives gates / milestones /
  routing — pick Other if none fits, or ask a manager to wire up a
  new kind").
- "+ Add a new kind…" sentinel option in the library form is hidden
  unless state.recipe.user_is_manager. Backend gate is the authority;
  the UI hide is just to stop showing a button that will error.
- The Step Type dropdown in the inline step-edit panel switched from
  a 24-line hard-coded XML option list to a t-foreach over
  state.kindOptions (the same kinds/list endpoint payload). One
  source of truth — retire / add a kind in the catalog and every
  picker reflects the change.

Migration impact (entech): 5 templates + 579 nodes backfilled via
name-match heuristic. 15 kinds flipped to active=False. Distribution
of the 579 backfilled nodes:
  racking 105, other 97, bake 91, wet_process 90, mask 74,
  inspect 44, plate 32, final_inspect 25, receiving 10,
  contract_review 9, ship 2.

Drive-by:
- Migration uses _ensure_kind() that also registers ir.model.data
  for the new xmlids so the subsequent data XML load doesn't create
  duplicate kind records.
- Stored related default_kind on fusion.plating.process.node /
  fp.step.template is written alongside kind_id in every SQL UPDATE
  so legacy `node.default_kind == 'foo'` comparisons stay accurate
  (the ORM doesn't recompute stored related fields after direct
  SQL writes).

Module: fusion_plating 19.0.20.5.0 → 19.0.20.6.0.
15 existing tests still green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 08:08:31 -04:00
gsinghpal
7c31269691 fix(simple-editor): stop seed resurrection + add promote/demote + drag substeps
Three bugs reported on 2026-05-20:

1. RESURRECTION. User deletes a substep in the Simple Editor (e.g.
   Soak Clean (S-3) under Cleaner), then on the next -u fusion_plating
   the substep comes back. Root cause: the recipe XML lived in the
   manifest's `data` list with `noupdate="1"`. Odoo's noupdate=1 only
   blocks UPDATE of existing records — when a record's ir.model.data
   row is missing, the loader treats it as "not yet created" and
   re-creates from XML. Every upgrade resurrected every user-deleted
   seed node.

   Fix: pull the recipe XML files out of `data` and load them once
   via post_init_hook → _seed_starter_recipes_once. Sentinel checks
   ir.model.data for each recipe's root xmlid; if present, skip
   loading entirely. Result: deletions are permanent across all
   future upgrades. Existing entech recipes untouched.

   Files affected: fp_recipe_enp_alum_basic, fp_recipe_enp_steel_basic,
   fp_recipe_enp_sp, fp_recipe_general_processing, fp_recipe_anodize,
   fp_recipe_chem_conversion.

2. PROMOTE / DEMOTE. Simple Editor had no way to turn a substep into
   a top-level operation, or to tuck an operation under another as a
   substep. Authors had to delete + re-create. New endpoints:

   * /fp/simple_recipe/step/promote → flips node_type 'step' →
     'operation', re-parents to the recipe (or sub-process) root,
     places right after the old parent operation.
   * /fp/simple_recipe/step/demote → flips 'operation' → 'step',
     re-parents under the preceding operation (or a caller-supplied
     target_op_id). Blocks demoting an operation that has its own
     children, with a helpful message.

   UI: each row in the editor now carries an up-arrow (promote, only
   shown on substeps) and a down-arrow (demote, only shown on
   operations). Confirmation dialog explains what's about to happen.

3. DRAG SUBSTEPS. Last commit (2142a66b) disabled drag on substep
   rows. Operators couldn't reorder substeps within an operation.
   Re-enabled drag on substeps. The step_reorder endpoint now groups
   incoming node_ids by parent_id and renumbers within each parent
   (10, 20, 30…). Cross-parent drag still no-ops on parent change —
   Promote/Demote buttons are the way to move between parents.

Drive-by:
- Added `from odoo import _` to the controller (missing import the
  new endpoints surfaced).
- Edit-panel field wiring audited: all fields visible in the screen
  (Step name, Default instructions, Step Type, Triggers Workflow,
  Parallel Start, QA Sign-off, Collect measurements, Instruction
  Images, custom prompts) persist correctly through step_write or
  dedicated endpoints. No broken wires.

Tests: 15 total in TestSimpleRecipeFlatten (was 10). 5 new cover
promote happy-path, promote reject (non-substep), demote happy-path,
demote block on has_children, and reorder parent-scoping.

Module: fusion_plating 19.0.20.4.0 → 19.0.20.5.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-19 22:53:09 -04:00
gsinghpal
2142a66bc0 fix(simple-editor): also surface step children of operations
Follow-up to 821e768b. The previous fix flattened sub_process nodes
so all 16 operations of ENP-STEEL-BASIC became visible — but the
Tree Editor also shows the 26 `step` nodes that live under each
operation ("Ready For Blast / Blast", "Soak Clean / Electroclean /
Primary Rinse", etc.). The Simple Editor still hid those, so author
+ Tree Editor still disagreed by 26 rows.

New `_flatten_recipe_nodes(recipe)` helper walks DFS and surfaces
BOTH operations and their step children. Each operation is followed
immediately by its step children in sequence order so the editor
renders them as a contiguous block:

  10. Ready For Steel Line
  11. Cleaner                            [Steel Line]
     ↳ Soak Clean (S-3)                  [Steel Line › Cleaner]
     ↳ Electroclean (S-3)                [Steel Line › Cleaner]
     ↳ Primary Rinse (S-4)               [Steel Line › Cleaner]
  15. Acid Dip (S-5)                     [Steel Line]
     ↳ Primary Rinse (S-6)               [Steel Line › Acid Dip (S-5)]
     ...

Payload additions on each step:
- `node_type`: 'operation' | 'step'
- `is_substep`: True for steps (renders indented)
- `nested_under`: chained path (sub-process › operation for substeps,
  sub-process for nested operations, '' for top-level operations)

UI: substep rows are indented 2.5rem, smaller font, no drag handle,
no numeric position. The "↳" indent glyph and a "[parent operation]"
chip make the parent-child relationship obvious. Substeps are not
draggable to keep the existing reorder semantics simple — Tree Editor
remains the home for structural changes.

Legacy `_flatten_recipe_operations` helper retained for back-compat
(it now delegates by filtering `node.node_type == 'operation'` from
the full walk).

ENP-STEEL-BASIC on entech: Simple Editor now shows 42 rows (was 10
before 821e768b, was 16 after 821e768b) — matches what the Tree
Editor displays exactly.

Tests: 10 total (was 7), 3 new cover the substep surfacing, path
chaining, and is_substep / node_type flags on the payload.

Module: fusion_plating 19.0.20.3.0 → 19.0.20.4.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-19 22:30:00 -04:00
gsinghpal
821e768b7e fix(simple-editor): surface operations nested inside sub_process nodes
Bug on ENP-STEEL-BASIC (2026-05-20): authoring used the Tree Editor
to build a recipe with a "Steel Line" sub_process holding 7 nested
operations (Cleaner, Acid Dip, Nickel Strike, E-Nickel Plate, etc.).
The Simple Editor's /fp/simple_recipe/load endpoint only walked
`recipe.child_ids`, so it returned 10 steps. The work order generator
(fp.job._generate_steps) walked the same tree depth-first and emitted
16 steps. Author and operator disagreed about what was in the recipe.

Fix: new `_flatten_recipe_operations(recipe)` helper walks the tree
depth-first, recurses into `recipe` and `sub_process`, emits each
`operation` exactly once, skips `step` children (they're sub-
instructions of operations). Mirrors the WO walker.

Step payload now carries a `nested_under` string — the chained sub-
process name(s) the operation lives inside (empty for top-level).
The Simple Editor XML renders that as a small "↳ Steel Line" badge
next to the step name so the author can see where each row came from
in the tree. Deep nesting chains with ' › ' (e.g. "Outer › Inner").

`step` children of `recipe` itself remain invisible — they were
silently skipped by the WO generator pre-19.0.18.8.0 anyway (only
operation nodes spawn fp.job.step rows). Restoring them here would
contradict that long-standing contract.

Edit/insert/reorder/remove endpoints unchanged: editing a nested
operation's name / description / tanks works (no parent change).
Drag-reorder within sub-process siblings still works. Drag across
sub-process boundaries isn't supported — opens the door for a Tree
Editor follow-up if needed, but the immediate "I can't see my
steps" complaint is resolved.

ENP-STEEL-BASIC on entech now shows all 16 operations in the Simple
Editor (was 10), with the 7 inside Steel Line tagged accordingly.

Tests: 7 new (TestSimpleRecipeFlatten) — flat recipes still work,
nested operations surface with correct path label, sub_process
nodes never appear as editor rows, step children of operations
stay hidden, deep-nested sub_processes chain path labels.

Module: fusion_plating 19.0.20.2.0 → 19.0.20.3.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-19 22:22:54 -04:00
gsinghpal
6b7b44264a changes 2026-05-10 10:25:12 -04:00
gsinghpal
586f05d567 chnages 2026-05-04 02:14:34 -04:00
gsinghpal
3cc393454d fix(simple-editor): HTML in chatter + library form + expand per-step inline edit
Three fixes from user feedback:

1. Chatter posting raw HTML
   _AUDIT_BODY in migration 19.0.18.8.0 was a plain str with <p>
   tags. message_post escaped it for safety, so the chatter pill
   rendered '<p><strong>...</strong></p>' literally to the recipe
   author. Wrapped in markupsafe.Markup so Odoo recognises it as
   safe HTML. Going forward: ANY message_post body containing HTML
   tags MUST be wrapped in Markup() — most callers already do this,
   the migration script was the outlier.

2. Library template editor showed raw <p> tags
   onOpenLibraryEdit was JSON-cloning the payload directly without
   running description through the existing _htmlToText helper that
   the per-step editor uses. Added the conversion. Save path
   (onSaveLibraryEditor + library_save) already wraps via
   _textToHtml so storage stays HTML-compatible.

3. Per-step inline form was missing critical fields — user had to
   delete + re-add a step to change Type/workflow trigger/parallel/signoff
   onToggleEdit now also captures default_kind, triggers_workflow_state_id,
   parallel_start, requires_signoff into the edit state. onSaveStep
   sends them in the write vals. Added _fpResetStepEdit helper to
   keep open/cancel/save reset paths in sync.

   New per-step form has:
     * Step Type (Default Kind) dropdown — drives workflow milestone
       triggers + step-kind routing (e.g. contract_review opens QA-005)
     * Triggers Workflow State dropdown (Sub 14) — per-step override
     * Parallel Start checkbox (Sub 13)
     * Require QA Sign-off checkbox

   step_write controller endpoint also gained a field whitelist —
   was previously accepting any vals dict from the client (security
   hole + opaque to maintainers).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-04 00:24:40 -04:00
gsinghpal
e54ffe7309 feat(jobs): Sub 14 polish — workflow state form layout + Simple Editor field
Two follow-ups on the workflow state work:

1) Form layout
   The "How triggers combine" help text was crammed into a 2-column
   group, taking ~25% of the available width. Pulled it out of the
   group and rendered as a full-width <div class="alert alert-info">
   below the trigger fields. Same fix applied to Notes — uses a
   <separator> + bare <field> for full sheet width.

2) Simple Recipe Editor support
   The trigger field was only exposed in the Tree Editor. Added it
   to the Simple Editor's inline library form too:

   * fp.step.template.triggers_workflow_state_id (new Many2one) —
     per-template default, snapshot-copied to recipe nodes when
     dropped into a recipe (added to _SNAPSHOT_FIELDS).
   * /fp/simple_recipe/workflow_states/list — new endpoint to feed
     the dropdown. Soft-fails when fusion_plating_jobs isn't
     installed (returns []).
   * Library editor JS — _fpEnsureWorkflowStatesLoaded helper
     caches the catalog on first open (create + edit paths both
     warm it). Save vals carry the trigger id.
   * Library editor XML — dropdown rendered after the flag
     checkboxes. Hidden when the catalog is empty so the form
     doesn't show a useless "— None —" pick.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-04 00:04:59 -04:00
gsinghpal
4e0b74d7ae feat(jobs): Sub 14 — configurable workflow state bar (Path B)
Replaces the generic Draft/Confirmed/In Progress/Done statusbar with
a shop-configurable list of plating-specific milestones. Bar advances
automatically as recipe steps complete; no manual button clicks.

What ships
==========

* New model: fp.job.workflow.state
  Catalog of milestones (name, code, sequence, color, triggers).
  Triggers can be:
    - trigger_default_kinds: "receiving,inspect" matches by step.default_kind
    - trigger_first_step_started: any wet/bake/mask/rack step started
    - trigger_all_steps_done: every non-cancelled step in done/skipped
    - block_when_quality_hold: held back while NCR/hold open
  Plus per-recipe-node override (see below).

* Default 7-state seed (data/fp_workflow_state_data.xml):
    Draft → Confirmed → Received → In Progress → Inspected → Shipped → Done
  noupdate=1 so per-shop edits survive module upgrade.

* Recipe-side trigger field on fusion.plating.process.node:
    triggers_workflow_state_id (Many2one, optional)
  Wins over default_kind matching. Lets the recipe author pin a
  specific step as a milestone trigger even when default_kind isn't
  set or doesn't match. Exposed in the Recipe Tree Editor properties
  panel (dropdown sourced from the catalog).

* fp.job.workflow_state_id (computed, stored)
  Iterates the catalog in sequence order; lands at the highest passed
  milestone. Recomputes on step state / kind / recipe_node / quality
  hold changes. Replaces fp.job.state on the form's statusbar.

* Settings UI: Configuration > Workflow States
  Standard list+form pages so admins can add / edit / deactivate
  states. Manager-group write permission, supervisor read.

What this does NOT do
=====================
  * Doesn't drop fp.job.state — that field still drives the internal
    state machine (button_confirm, action_cancel, etc.). Only the
    UI statusbar is reassigned.
  * No migration for existing jobs — they auto-recompute on next read
    because workflow_state_id is a stored compute with the right
    api.depends. Existing WH/JOB/00342 will display its current
    workflow state on next page load.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 23:39:38 -04:00
gsinghpal
4c6bad04c5 Revert "feat(jobs): step sequences are 1, 2, 3, ... not 10, 20, 30, ..."
This reverts commit 32d48ea44d.
2026-05-03 23:31:02 -04:00
gsinghpal
32d48ea44d feat(jobs): step sequences are 1, 2, 3, ... not 10, 20, 30, ...
User feedback: operators kept asking why their work order said "Step 10"
for the first row. The 10-spacing was originally there to allow midpoint
inserts (insert sequence 15 between 10 and 20 without renumbering).
Tradeoff is operator confusion, and recipe authors rarely insert in the
middle anyway. Switching to 1-based contiguous sequences.

Files changed (every step-sequence allocation in the codebase):

fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job.py
  _generate_steps_from_recipe — seq_counter starts at 1, increments by 1.
  This is the path that builds fp.job.step records, so new jobs now show
  Step 1, 2, 3, ... in the work order.

fusion_plating_bridge_mrp/models/mrp_production.py
  Same change for the legacy MRP bridge so customers still on
  mrp.production also get 1-based numbering.

fusion_plating/controllers/recipe_controller.py
  - create_node: max_seq + 1
  - reorder_nodes: idx + 1
  - swap renumber: i (was i * 10)
  - paste-import renumber: i (was i * 10)
  - move_node: max_seq + 1
  - _copy_subtree (recipe duplicate/import): i (was i * 10)

fusion_plating/controllers/simple_recipe_controller.py
  - _sequence_for_position rewritten — always renumbers siblings to
    keep them contiguous. Returns pos + 1 for the inserted node.
    Old code used midpoint-with-fallback-to-renumber (10/20/30 spacing).
  - step_reorder: i (was i * 10)
  - library_input_add + step_add_input: existing_max + 1

What this DOESN'T do
  Existing fp.job.step records keep their old sequences (10, 20, ...).
  Re-confirm the SO to spawn a fresh job if you want the clean 1-based
  numbering on a current test job. No data migration — we're in dev
  and the user explicitly said test data is disposable.

What this DOES do
  Every NEW job created from this commit forward shows Step 1, 2, 3, ...
  Every NEW recipe step inserted via the simple editor / tree editor
  also gets sequence 1, 2, 3, ...

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 22:58:21 -04:00
gsinghpal
9794a98de9 feat(jobs): Sub 13 sequential step enforcement + Sub 12e v3 wizard
Two coherent feature drops shipping together because their fp_job_step
edits overlap. Both target operator workflow correctness.

## Sub 13 — Sequential step enforcement (recipe + per-step)

Background:
  Investigation on WH/JOB/00339 showed operators starting Incoming
  Inspection while Contract Review was still in_progress. Audit:
  98.7% of recipe operations system-wide had requires_predecessor_done
  = false (the legacy per-step opt-in defaults off, recipe authors
  rarely tick the box).

Architecture:
  Recipe-level toggle + per-step opt-out (Option A from /investigate).
  * fusion.plating.process.node.enforce_sequential — Boolean on the
    recipe root. Default True. When True, every operation under this
    recipe waits for earlier-sequence steps to finish before it can
    start.
  * fusion.plating.process.node.parallel_start — Boolean on operation
    nodes. When True, this step bypasses the sequential gate (e.g.
    paperwork or QA review that runs alongside production).
  * Mirrored on fp.step.template (parallel_start) so library steps
    carry the flag into snapshots.
  * fp.job.enforce_sequential — related from recipe_id. Snapshotted
    at job creation so a recipe author flipping the recipe's flag
    AFTER job generation does NOT change behaviour mid-run.
  * fp.job.step.parallel_start — related from recipe_node_id.
  * Decision matrix (encapsulated in
    fp.job.step._fp_should_block_predecessors):
        recipe.enforce_sequential | step.parallel_start | step.req_pred_done | block?
        --------------------------|---------------------|--------------------|------
                 True             |       False         |        any         |  YES
                 True             |       True          |        any         |   no
                 False            |        any          |       True         |  YES
                 False            |        any          |       False        |   no
  * Manager bypass via context fp_skip_predecessor_check=True (existing).

Runtime gates:
  * fp.job.step.button_start — calls _fp_should_block_predecessors;
    raises UserError naming the blocking earlier step(s).
  * fp.job.step.can_start — computed Boolean for view-side disable.
  * Move wizard predecessor check
    (fusion_plating_shopfloor/controllers/move_controller.py) — uses
    the same helper so tablet + backend behave identically.

UI surface:
  * Recipe form (fp_process_node_views.xml) — enforce_sequential
    toggle on recipe root, parallel_start checkbox on operations.
  * Step template form — parallel_start checkbox.
  * Simple Recipe Editor (inline library form) — Parallel Start
    checkbox + legacy flag demoted with muted styling + supervisor
    group gate.
  * Recipe Tree Editor (properties panel) — both flags exposed,
    only-show on the right node_type.
  * Controllers updated to allowlist + payload the new fields.

Migration:
  fusion_plating/migrations/19.0.18.12.0/post-migrate.py — sets
  enforce_sequential = TRUE on every existing recipe-root node.
  Idempotent. User confirmed dev-stage data, so retroactive flip
  is safe (no production jobs to disrupt).

Tests:
  TestSequentialEnforcement (10 tests) covering:
    * sequential mode blocks out-of-order start
    * first step always startable
    * predecessor finish/skip unlocks next
    * parallel_start opts out of gate
    * free-flow mode bypasses gate
    * legacy requires_predecessor_done still honoured in free-flow
    * manager bypass via context
    * can_start compute reflects state correctly
    * library template parallel_start snapshots into recipe-node

## Sub 12e — Record Inputs Wizard v3 (card layout, dark-mode aware)

Background:
  v2 wizard was a 17-column wide editable table. Operators got lost
  finding which value column applied to their row's type, horizontal
  scroll required on tablets, composite types crammed into one row.

New layout:
  * Each measurement renders as a stacked card (CSS Grid + display
    transformation on the existing list widget — preserves inline
    editing, no JS rewrite).
  * Card header: prompt name (large, bold) + type/unit pills.
  * Card body: ONLY the value widget for this row's type
    (number / boolean / date / text / photo / multi-point / panel).
  * Composite types (multi-point thickness 5x reading + avg, bath
    panel 4 fields) get inline sub-grid inside the card.
  * Empty state ("no measurement prompts") with friendly CTA.

Dark mode:
  * SCSS branches at compile time on $o-webclient-color-scheme
    (per fusion-plating/CLAUDE.md note).
  * Tokens: 7 surface colours + 4 ink levels with light/dark hex
    pairs, all behind var(--fp-*) custom properties for per-deploy
    override.
  * Registered in BOTH web.assets_backend AND web.assets_web_dark
    so each bundle compiles its own palette.

Tablet polish:
  @media (max-width: 900px) — collapse meta below prompt + bump
  numeric input min-height to 56px.

Defensive:
  * v2 view kept in the XML file (instant rollback by changing one
    view_id ref).
  * `:has(.o_invisible_modifier)` rule drops empty cells out of the
    grid so Odoo's invisible="..." doesn't punch holes in layout.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 21:24:12 -04:00
gsinghpal
4213c44e51 feat(simple-editor): node_type bug fix + inline library authoring + back nav
Bucket 1 — Generation bug fix
- post-migrate.py for 19.0.18.8.0 promotes flat 'step' children of
  recipes to 'operation' so fp.job._generate_steps() picks them up.
  Filter is narrow: only direct children of node_type='recipe' get
  flipped, tree-editor sub-steps (parent.node_type='operation') are
  untouched. Idempotent. Posts an audit chatter note on each affected
  recipe.
- Simple Editor controller hardcodes node_type='operation' on insert
  + snapshot-import path so future recipes start correct.

Bucket 2 — Inline library authoring
- 6 new JSONRPC routes (/fp/simple_recipe/library/load + save +
  seed_defaults + input/{add,write,remove}, /fp/simple_recipe/tank/list).
- + New Step button in the right pane opens an inline form with name /
  kind / icon / instructions / stations / flags / prompts table.
- Pencil icon on each library row reopens the same form prefilled.
- Step Kind picker leads with 'Generic — no automatic behaviour'.
- 'Seed defaults from kind' calls action_seed_default_inputs server-side
  for kinds that have curated default prompts.

Bucket 3 — Back nav
- '← Recipes' button in the header (or '← Part' when opened from
  Process Composer) mirrors recipe_tree_editor.js, with
  clearBreadcrumbs:true to avoid stack pollution.

Verified on entech: LGPS1104's 19 'step' children now show as
'operation', migration chatter note posted on the recipe, asset cache
busted.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-30 16:16:14 -04:00
gsinghpal
ec0a07fbe9 fix(audit-trail): 3 production bugs found via end-to-end Anodize battle test
Battle-tested complete workflow on entech: ABC Manufacturing + Anodize
recipe (id=136) cloned to part-variant (id=1775) → SO S00276 confirmed →
fp.job 1234 with 17 steps → recorded 56 measurement values exercising all
13 input types (incl. all 4 new types) → CoC chronological report renders
69KB with all values incl. photo thumbnails.

Bugs found and fixed:

1. fp.process.node.input_ids missing copy=True — when a master recipe
   was cloned per-part (the standard variant pattern), the operator
   prompts on each step did NOT get copied to the variant. Result: jobs
   built from variants ran with zero prompts even though the master had
   them. Fixed: input_ids now copy=True so cloning auto-duplicates.

2. CoC chronological template read dest.input_ids where dest is
   fp.job.step. Steps don't carry input_ids — that field lives on the
   recipe node. Result: AttributeError aborted the entire CoC render.
   Fixed: walk via dest.recipe_node_id.input_ids; preserves the existing
   collect=True filter.

3. CoC chronological template used hasattr() in a t-value expression.
   QWeb's expression engine doesn't expose Python builtins, raised
   KeyError: 'hasattr'. Fixed: use 'collect' in i._fields instead.

Also enhanced photo rendering in CoC: was just "[Attachment]" placeholder;
now renders an actual <img> thumbnail (max 80px tall) plus the filename.

Battle-test script saved to fusion_plating/scripts/bt_e2e_anodize_v2.py
for re-runs / regression testing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-29 22:53:59 -04:00
gsinghpal
a2fe1fcbcc changes 2026-04-29 03:35:33 -04:00
gsinghpal
194d5d96dd feat(sub12a): JSONRPC endpoints for the Simple Recipe Editor
11 routes under /fp/simple_recipe/...:
  load
  library/{list,create,write,delete}
  step/{insert,write,remove,reorder}
  template/{list,import}

Library/template imports snapshot-copy fields (Q4 = A locked) — no
live references. The _SNAPSHOT_FIELDS + _INPUT_SNAPSHOT_FIELDS module
constants are the single source of truth for what gets copied;
adding a new authoring field on fp.step.template means appending it
once to _SNAPSHOT_FIELDS and the controller stays correct.

library_delete is soft when nodes still reference the template via
source_template_id (operator can't accidentally orphan recipe steps).

Uses recipe.check_access('read') (Odoo 19 unified API) instead of the
older check_access_rights/check_access_rule pair.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-27 20:38:16 -04:00
gsinghpal
41d0908ade changes 2026-04-24 21:04:38 -04:00
gsinghpal
9d7b7daf5a feat(plating): tree-editor import supports insert-before position
The import feature appended every imported node to the end of the
target recipe. That's wrong for the common case — General Processing
has Shipping as its last operation, so importing an Electroless
Nickel pack should land BEFORE Shipping, not after it. The user
would otherwise have to click Move Up dozens of times.

Controller: /fp/recipe/node/import_children now accepts
insert_before_id:
  null/missing  → append at end (default, unchanged)
  0             → insert at the start
  <positive id> → insert right before that top-level child

Implementation reorders target's top-level children in one pass
after Phase 1 creates the copies (placeholder sequence=0). Phase 2
splits existing vs. new, finds the anchor index in the existing
list, and reassigns sequences 10/20/30/... across the merged list.
Collisions on the old max_seq-based append strategy are eliminated.

JS: state.importInsertBefore drives a new "Insert:" dropdown in the
toolbar with options:
  — At the end — (default)
  — At the start —
  Before <each top-level child name>

Smoke on entech (3-case): insert-before-middle, insert-at-start,
insert-at-end all produce the expected ordering.

fusion_plating → 19.0.7.2.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 08:16:05 -04:00
gsinghpal
03f41422de fix(plating): tree editor — title wrapping + import hierarchy
Two bugs reported on the tree editor after the move/import feature
shipped:

1. Card titles truncated to "Contrac…" because .o_fp_re_title had
   white-space: nowrap + text-overflow: ellipsis. Swapped to
   white-space: normal + overflow-wrap: anywhere so long names
   wrap onto multiple lines inside the card. Widened card max-
   width 380→460px and bumped min-width 240→260px so wrapped
   titles have room.

2. Import-children was flattening the tree — all operations AND
   their step children landed at the top level instead of staying
   nested under their operations.

   Root cause: src_node.copy({'parent_id': new_parent.id, ...})
   on a _parent_store model behaved unpredictably — in some runs
   the override in copy_vals didn't stick and child recursion
   ended up with a wrong parent_id. Rewrote _copy_subtree to use
   copy_data() + Node.create() so parent_id is set explicitly and
   child_ids / parent_path are stripped (we recurse ourselves).

   Smoke verified on entech: General Processing (1 root + 5 ops
   + 7 steps = 13 nodes) imports with hierarchy bit-identical to
   source.

fusion_plating → 19.0.7.1.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 08:08:55 -04:00
gsinghpal
8853cdd0c6 feat(plating): tree editor — move up/down buttons + import from recipe
Two gaps closed on the recipe tree editor based on user feedback:

1. Explicit Move Up / Move Down buttons on every non-recipe node
   row, driven by a new POST /fp/recipe/node/move_sibling endpoint.
   DnD already existed but couldn't reliably move a node above a
   sibling when the drop zone overlapped the node being dragged.
   The button-based flow sidesteps that entirely and makes "nudge
   one slot" a single click.

2. Inline "Import from recipe" toolbar that appears when the
   Import button is clicked in the header. User picks a source
   recipe from a dropdown (POST /fp/recipe/list, excludes the
   current one), toggles "Skip duplicate names", and clicks
   Import. POST /fp/recipe/node/import_children deep-copies every
   top-level child of the source under the current recipe,
   preserving the sub-tree structure. Dedupe is on by default so
   re-running the import on an already-populated recipe is a
   no-op; users who want to merge identical-named branches can
   untick the checkbox.

Controller endpoints:
- /fp/recipe/list (list recipe roots for the picker)
- /fp/recipe/node/move_sibling (swap with neighbour by direction)
- /fp/recipe/node/import_children (deep-copy subtree with dedupe)

Smoke verified on entech: 5-child recipe imported cleanly, dedupe
blocks re-import, sequence swap works.

fusion_plating → 19.0.7.0.0

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-23 08:00:24 -04:00
gsinghpal
7c7ef06057 folder rename 2026-04-16 20:53:53 -04:00