Two coherent feature drops shipping together because their fp_job_step
edits overlap. Both target operator workflow correctness.
## Sub 13 — Sequential step enforcement (recipe + per-step)
Background:
Investigation on WH/JOB/00339 showed operators starting Incoming
Inspection while Contract Review was still in_progress. Audit:
98.7% of recipe operations system-wide had requires_predecessor_done
= false (the legacy per-step opt-in defaults off, recipe authors
rarely tick the box).
Architecture:
Recipe-level toggle + per-step opt-out (Option A from /investigate).
* fusion.plating.process.node.enforce_sequential — Boolean on the
recipe root. Default True. When True, every operation under this
recipe waits for earlier-sequence steps to finish before it can
start.
* fusion.plating.process.node.parallel_start — Boolean on operation
nodes. When True, this step bypasses the sequential gate (e.g.
paperwork or QA review that runs alongside production).
* Mirrored on fp.step.template (parallel_start) so library steps
carry the flag into snapshots.
* fp.job.enforce_sequential — related from recipe_id. Snapshotted
at job creation so a recipe author flipping the recipe's flag
AFTER job generation does NOT change behaviour mid-run.
* fp.job.step.parallel_start — related from recipe_node_id.
* Decision matrix (encapsulated in
fp.job.step._fp_should_block_predecessors):
recipe.enforce_sequential | step.parallel_start | step.req_pred_done | block?
--------------------------|---------------------|--------------------|------
True | False | any | YES
True | True | any | no
False | any | True | YES
False | any | False | no
* Manager bypass via context fp_skip_predecessor_check=True (existing).
Runtime gates:
* fp.job.step.button_start — calls _fp_should_block_predecessors;
raises UserError naming the blocking earlier step(s).
* fp.job.step.can_start — computed Boolean for view-side disable.
* Move wizard predecessor check
(fusion_plating_shopfloor/controllers/move_controller.py) — uses
the same helper so tablet + backend behave identically.
UI surface:
* Recipe form (fp_process_node_views.xml) — enforce_sequential
toggle on recipe root, parallel_start checkbox on operations.
* Step template form — parallel_start checkbox.
* Simple Recipe Editor (inline library form) — Parallel Start
checkbox + legacy flag demoted with muted styling + supervisor
group gate.
* Recipe Tree Editor (properties panel) — both flags exposed,
only-show on the right node_type.
* Controllers updated to allowlist + payload the new fields.
Migration:
fusion_plating/migrations/19.0.18.12.0/post-migrate.py — sets
enforce_sequential = TRUE on every existing recipe-root node.
Idempotent. User confirmed dev-stage data, so retroactive flip
is safe (no production jobs to disrupt).
Tests:
TestSequentialEnforcement (10 tests) covering:
* sequential mode blocks out-of-order start
* first step always startable
* predecessor finish/skip unlocks next
* parallel_start opts out of gate
* free-flow mode bypasses gate
* legacy requires_predecessor_done still honoured in free-flow
* manager bypass via context
* can_start compute reflects state correctly
* library template parallel_start snapshots into recipe-node
## Sub 12e — Record Inputs Wizard v3 (card layout, dark-mode aware)
Background:
v2 wizard was a 17-column wide editable table. Operators got lost
finding which value column applied to their row's type, horizontal
scroll required on tablets, composite types crammed into one row.
New layout:
* Each measurement renders as a stacked card (CSS Grid + display
transformation on the existing list widget — preserves inline
editing, no JS rewrite).
* Card header: prompt name (large, bold) + type/unit pills.
* Card body: ONLY the value widget for this row's type
(number / boolean / date / text / photo / multi-point / panel).
* Composite types (multi-point thickness 5x reading + avg, bath
panel 4 fields) get inline sub-grid inside the card.
* Empty state ("no measurement prompts") with friendly CTA.
Dark mode:
* SCSS branches at compile time on $o-webclient-color-scheme
(per fusion-plating/CLAUDE.md note).
* Tokens: 7 surface colours + 4 ink levels with light/dark hex
pairs, all behind var(--fp-*) custom properties for per-deploy
override.
* Registered in BOTH web.assets_backend AND web.assets_web_dark
so each bundle compiles its own palette.
Tablet polish:
@media (max-width: 900px) — collapse meta below prompt + bump
numeric input min-height to 56px.
Defensive:
* v2 view kept in the XML file (instant rollback by changing one
view_id ref).
* `:has(.o_invisible_modifier)` rule drops empty cells out of the
grid so Odoo's invisible="..." doesn't punch holes in layout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two bugs fixed in one drop, both targeting the contract review (QA-005)
enforcement gap reported on entech.
## Bug 1 — WO step routed to wrong wizard
Symptom: clicking Finish & Next or Record on a Contract Review step in
WH/JOB/00339 opened the generic measurement wizard with three fake
prompts (Reviewer Initials / Date Reviewed / QA-005 Approved). No path
to the actual QA-005 form from the work order.
Root cause: action_finish_and_advance + action_open_input_wizard had no
branch for recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'. The step.kind
mapping collapses contract_review -> 'other' so kind-based detection
wouldn't have worked either; gate has to live at the recipe-node layer.
Fix in fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py (v19.0.8.14.6):
- action_finish_and_advance:329 calls _fp_contract_review_redirect
before the input-wizard branch
- action_open_input_wizard:844 same gate, keeps Record button consistent
- _fp_contract_review_redirect:866 (new) returns the part's
action_start_contract_review() unless review.state in
(complete, dismissed) — gate clears so the step can finish after
the operator signs QA-005.
## Bug 2 — Part create did not enforce contract review
Symptom: spec called for a banner-only UX. User wanted true automatic
enforcement on first part creation under an enforced customer.
Fix in fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_part_catalog.py (v19.0.4.10.0):
- @api.model_create_multi def create() override
- _fp_enforce_contract_review_on_create() helper auto-stages the
fp.contract.review record AND surfaces three prominent reminders:
1. Sticky bus.bus warning toast (top-right, doesn't auto-dismiss)
2. mail.activity (To Do) on the part for the current user
3. Smart button on the part form lights up (review now exists)
- Idempotent: skips parts that already carry a review id
- Soft-fails: bus or activity outage doesn't block part creation
- create()-only — write/update flows never re-trigger
Sub 4's existing info banner stays as a fourth surface.
## Tests
- fusion_plating_jobs/tests/test_fp_job_extensions.py:
+TestContractReviewStepRouting (5 tests covering both routing methods,
the complete/dismissed gate-clear, and non-CR step regression)
- fusion_plating_quality/tests/test_part_catalog_contract_review_enforcement.py
(NEW): 9 tests covering auto-create, batch create, idempotency,
activity surface, bus surface, write-must-not-retrigger, soft-fail.
- docs/superpowers/tests/2026-04-22-sub4-smoke.py: flipped the
"no review yet" assertion to "review auto-created" to match new
behavior. Sign-flow assertions unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The Operator Instructions panel had a hardcoded inline style
(background: #f8f9fa) which became a white-on-dark unreadable blob
in dark mode. Replaced with a CSS class backed by an SCSS file that
branches at compile-time via $o-webclient-color-scheme — registered
in both web.assets_backend (light) and web.assets_web_dark (dark)
bundles per the CLAUDE.md pattern.
Tokens: panel bg #f8f9fa light / #22262d dark; border #d8dadd /
#3a3f47; text #212529 / #e8eaed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Click a step's name in the embedded job-form list → opens a read-only
modal with everything a manager wants in one scroll: equipment,
schedule, master collect-measurements banner, operator instructions
(rich-text from recipe_node.description), measurement prompts list,
and values recorded so far.
Implementation: separate read-only form view bound to the embedded
field via context={'form_view_ref': '...'}. The standalone editable
form view stays registered for the Job Steps menu, so direct
navigation still loads the editable variant.
Three new computed/related fields on fp.job.step:
- quick_look_instructions (Html, related from recipe_node_id.description)
- quick_look_prompt_ids (filtered+sorted recipe_node.input_ids, step_input only)
- quick_look_recorded_value_ids (search across moves: input_value rows
whose move.from_step_id == self.id)
Plus a small action_open_full_form method that escapes from the modal
to the editable form when the manager actually needs to edit.
Edge cases:
- No recipe_node_id → instructions panel shows empty-state hint
- collect_measurements=False → amber banner: "Master switch off — no
values will be collected at runtime"
- Multiple moves on same step → values list shows all, newest first
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-30-step-details-modal-design.md.
Verified on entech: step "11. Hard Anodize Type III" populates with
516 chars instructions + 7 prompts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three connected operator-workflow features for entech.
A. fp.job smart buttons — count fields and action methods for sale
order, steps, deliveries, invoices, payments, quality holds,
certificates, time logs, and portal job. Each is an oe_stat_button
that drills into the matching records, mirroring the sale.order
pattern. Cross-module models are runtime-detected so the form
stays clean when bridge modules are uninstalled.
B. Reusable QR scanner OWL component (`<QrScanner/>`) wired into the
Manager Desk, Tablet Station, Plant Overview, and Process Tree
headers. Click → modal with rear-camera stream (getUserMedia) +
BarcodeDetector live decode → opens the matching fp.job form via
the action service. Falls back to a manual URL paste box on
browsers without BarcodeDetector. Works on iOS 17+ Safari and
Android Chrome. Width uses `min(420px, 92vw)` wrapped in #{} so
dart-sass passes it through verbatim instead of trying to compute
incompatible units at compile time.
C. /fp/tank/<id> public-but-auth-required tank status page for NFC
taps. Renders the tank's current step (in-progress / paused),
queued ready steps, and most recent bath chemistry log (lines
table) on a mobile-first page. URL-based so it works on iOS Safari
without the Web NFC API — the operator taps the NFC tag, the URL
opens in the default browser, the page auto-renders. New
web.assets_frontend bundle entry pulls in the design tokens +
tank_status.scss.
Manifest version bumps: jobs 19.0.5.0.0, shopfloor 19.0.16.0.0.
Tests: 44 pass (3 new smart-button assertions added).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The recipe→steps generator was copying coating.thickness_uom blind
into fp.job.step.thickness_uom, but the two selections use
different value codes:
fp.coating.config.thickness_uom : 'mils' / 'microns' / 'inches'
fp.job.step.thickness_uom : 'mil' / 'um' / 'inch'
Result: any SO confirmed with a coating using the long-form codes
(real demo data uses 'mils') hit a 'Wrong value for ...' selection
error, the savepoint rolled back, and the fp.job ended up with 0
steps.
Add an explicit mapping. Unknown values fall through to the step
default ('um'). Demo seed re-run after the fix produces 234 steps
across 31 jobs (was 207); thickness_uom distribution: 228 um, 6 mil.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Removes the parallel OWL/controller stack I built in
fusion_plating_jobs (job_process_tree, job_plant_overview,
job_manager_dashboard, job_tablet, job_*.scss, plus parallel
controllers and action XML files). Refactors the existing
fusion_plating_shopfloor components in place to bind to
fp.job / fp.job.step instead of mrp.production / mrp.workorder.
End state:
- ONE operator UI module (shopfloor) instead of two parallel ones
- Existing token system (_fp_shopfloor_tokens.scss) reused as
designed - no duplicate jobs tokens
- Existing /fp/shopfloor/* RPC URLs preserved (no integration
breakage); workorder_id kwargs accepted as legacy aliases for
step_id / job_id so older tablet clients keep working
- Existing visual designs preserved - only the data layer
underneath changed
- Process Tree button on fp.job form now points at
fusion_plating_shopfloor's fp_process_tree client action
- Bake Windows / First-Piece Gates / Bake Oven / Operator Queue
models stay where they were
- legacy_menu_hide.xml trimmed: only the bridge_mrp Production
Priorities entry remains; the 3 shopfloor menus (Manager Desk,
Plant Overview, Tablet Station) are now visible (the canonical
native consoles)
Manifests:
- fusion_plating_jobs 19.0.3.1.0 -> 19.0.4.0.0 (consolidation bump,
no more bundled JS/SCSS, only job_scan controller retained)
- fusion_plating_shopfloor 19.0.14.4.0 -> 19.0.15.0.0 (asset bundle
cache-bust + significant controller refactor)
Tests pass on entech: 0 failed, 0 errors of 41 tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three batched changes that close out the original 10-phase
migration plan.
1. Phase 5 — Job Margin report bound to fp.job (replaces the
mrp.production-bound report_wo_margin). Per-step labour cost
table + margin summary using existing fp.job.step.cost_total
from Phase 1.
2. Polish:
- Real implementations for fp.job.step.button_pause,
button_skip, button_cancel (was NotImplementedError stubs).
button_pause closes the open timelog and sums duration_actual,
mirroring button_finish; button_skip/cancel transition state
with UserError guards.
- Explicit ondelete= policies on fp.job's cross-module Many2ones
(part_catalog/coating restrict, customer_spec/portal/delivery
set null) — was implicit set null.
- Standard Nexa Systems author/website/maintainer/support block
on fusion_plating_jobs manifest, suppressing the install
warning.
3. Legacy hide:
- New 'Plating Legacy Menus' group (group_fusion_plating_legacy_menus)
— nobody in it by default.
- Old shopfloor Manager Desk + Plant Overview + Tablet Station
menus restricted to that group, hiding them from operators
now that the native equivalents under 'Plating Jobs (Native)'
exist. (Note: ir.ui.menu uses group_ids in Odoo 19, not the
deprecated groups_id alias.)
Manifest 19.0.2.4.0 → 19.0.3.0.0. fusion_plating_shopfloor added
to depends so the legacy menu xmlid references resolve at install
time.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ports fusion_plating_shopfloor's process_tree.js to bind to fp.job
instead of mrp.production. Consumes the /fp/jobs/process_tree
JSON endpoint built in Phase 6 lean.
Renders the recipe tree as cards. Each operation card shows the
step state (pending/ready/in_progress/done/etc.) when there's a
matching fp.job.step. Click an operation card -> open the step
form. Click Back -> return to the job form.
New 'Process Tree' button on the fp.job form (manager-only)
launches the client action with job_id context.
Manifest 19.0.2.1.0 -> 19.0.2.2.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Migration script now sets context fp_jobs_migration=True before
creating fp.job records. action_confirm and button_mark_done check
this flag and skip side-effects (portal job creation, QC check,
racking inspection, delivery, certificate, notification dispatch)
when migrating.
Without this, the migration would double-create portal jobs / QC
checks / racking inspections — once via bridge_mrp's original
create on the source MO, once via jobs module's lifecycle hook on
the new fp.job mirror. With the gate, the migration script
explicitly rebinds the existing dependents via x_fc_job_id.
Manifest 19.0.2.0.0 → 19.0.2.1.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds legacy_mrp_production_id (Integer index) on fp.job and
legacy_mrp_workorder_id on fp.job.step. Used as the idempotency
key during cutover migration.
Three scripts under fusion_plating_jobs/scripts/:
- audit_pre_migration.py — counts and data-quality concerns BEFORE
- migrate_to_fp_jobs.py — copies MO->fp.job, WO->fp.job.step, time
logs, rebinds cross-refs (batches,
holds, certs, readings, portals,
inspections, deliveries). Idempotent.
- audit_post_migration.py — counts and verifies AFTER
Migration is run manually from \`odoo shell\` at cutover (not as
auto post-migration hook, for safety). README explains usage.
Tests verify the legacy id fields exist and the migration script
files are well-formed Python.
Manifest 19.0.1.9.0 -> 19.0.2.0.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Adds 'job_confirmed' and 'job_complete' trigger events to
fp.notification.template (legacy 'mo_confirmed' / 'mo_complete'
stay for bridge_mrp).
- fp.job.action_confirm and button_mark_done now fire those
notifications best-effort via fp.notification.template._dispatch
(silent skip if templates absent or notifications module missing).
- Adds x_fc_source ['mrp', 'jobs'] tag to fusion.plating.kpi.value
so Phase 9 dashboards can filter or display both sources.
- Verified aerospace/nuclear/cgp/safety modules don't directly
reference mrp.production or mrp.workorder.
Configurator integration was already covered by Task 2.5's SO
confirm hook (reads x_fc_part_catalog_id and x_fc_coating_config_id
from sale.order.line).
Manifest 19.0.1.6.0 -> 19.0.1.7.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds x_fc_job_id / x_fc_step_id Many2ones via _inherit on:
- fusion.plating.batch (workorder_id stays for legacy MRP-bound batches)
- fusion.plating.quality.hold
- fp.certificate
- fp.thickness.reading
- fusion.plating.delivery (parallel to existing job_ref Char)
- fp.racking.inspection (parallel to existing production_id)
fp.job.action_confirm now also calls a best-effort racking-inspection
auto-create. The current fp.racking.inspection still has a required
production_id, so the helper skips cleanly when this job has no MO link
(pure-native mode). Phase 9 cutover flips the required FK to fp.job.
Strategy: parallel coexistence — bridge_mrp's existing fields stay
populated; this adds NEW fields populated by the native flow. Phase 9
cutover stops populating the old fields.
Adds fusion_plating_batch + fusion_plating_receiving to jobs module
depends.
Note: spec referenced fp.batch / fp.quality.hold; the actual models
in this codebase are fusion.plating.batch / fusion.plating.quality.hold
— used the real model names.
Manifest 19.0.1.5.0 → 19.0.1.6.0. 29 jobs tests pass.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Task 2.6: fp.job.action_confirm auto-creates fusion.plating.portal.job
with x_fc_job_id back-reference. Idempotent (skip if already linked).
- Task 2.7: fp.job.action_confirm checks customer.x_fc_requires_qc
and best-effort creates a fusion.plating.quality.check (the model
lives in bridge_mrp; runtime-detected to avoid dep cycle).
- Task 2.8: fp.job.button_mark_done sets state='done', date_finished,
auto-creates draft fusion.plating.delivery and best-effort triggers
fp.certificate generation.
- Task 2.9: account.move.action_post links invoice -> fp.job via SO
origin lookup, updates portal_job state to complete and stamps
invoice_ref.
5 new tests cover: portal job creation + idempotency, mark_done state
+ delivery, cancel-then-mark-done blocked.
Best-effort patterns (try/except + runtime model detection) used for
QC + cert because their target models are in dependent modules
that this module doesn't depend on by design.
qc_check_id field on fp.job still deferred — adding it here would
require depending on bridge_mrp.
Manifest 19.0.1.4.0 -> 19.0.1.5.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Settings flag controls which SO confirm path runs. Default False
keeps the legacy bridge_mrp / mrp.production flow on entech.
Setting True diverts confirm into fp.job creation.
Both hooks coexist — bridge_mrp's _fp_auto_create_mo and the new
_fp_auto_create_job — but only one creates records per SO confirm
(controlled by the flag).
The new _fp_auto_create_job mirrors bridge_mrp's grouping logic
(x_fc_wo_group_tag), recipe resolution (coating → part), and
traceability fields (origin, sale_order_line_ids).
Settings UI shows the flag in a 'Fusion Plating Jobs' app section
of the standard Configuration menu.
3 new tests cover: flag off no-op, flag on creates job, idempotency.
Manifest 19.0.1.3.0 → 19.0.1.4.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Native port of fusion_plating_bridge_mrp's
_generate_workorders_from_recipe method. Walks the recipe tree,
creates one fp.job.step per 'operation' node, formats child 'step'
nodes as step instructions on chatter, respects opt-in/out
overrides from fp.job.node.override.
Adaptations from the original:
- Creates fp.job.step (not mrp.workorder)
- Maps fusion.plating.work.center to fp.work.centre via forward
link (x_fc_fp_work_centre_id) or code fallback
- Uses native field names (job_id, work_centre_id, etc.)
- Drops work_role_id (not on fp.job.step yet — Task 2.6+)
- Drops _fp_autofill_default_equipment (not yet on step)
5 new tests cover: basic generation, idempotency, no-recipe skip,
opt-in override behaviour, recipe_node_id link.
Manifest 19.0.1.2.0 → 19.0.1.3.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mirror of fusion.plating.job.node.override from bridge_mrp, but
bound to fp.job. bridge_mrp's version stays alive for legacy MO
flow during the migration. Both coexist.
Adds override_ids One2many to fp.job via _inherit, plus
unique(job_id, node_id) constraint.
Note: spec-suggested _sql_constraints syntax is deprecated in
Odoo 19 ("Model attribute '_sql_constraints' is no longer
supported, please define model.Constraint on the model"). Used
the new class-attribute form: _unique_job_node = models.Constraint(...).
Verified the UNIQUE index is created on the table.
3 new tests: create, uniqueness, one2many backref.
Manifest 19.0.1.1.1 -> 19.0.1.2.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Code review noted this was asymmetric — only part_catalog_id had
explicit index=True among the 5 new fields, and Phase 1 core fp.job
relies on Odoo's implicit FK btree for ALL Many2ones (no explicit
indexes). Removed for consistency.
Important I2 (no explicit ondelete= policies) is deferred to a
phase-end polish task that addresses both Phase 1 core and Phase 2
extension fields uniformly.
Manifest 19.0.1.1.0 → 19.0.1.1.1.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 of the 6 deferred fields from Phase 1 Task 1.4 land here in
fusion_plating_jobs:
- part_catalog_id (fp.part.catalog from configurator)
- coating_config_id (fp.coating.config from configurator)
- customer_spec_id (fusion.plating.customer.spec from quality)
- portal_job_id (fusion.plating.portal.job from portal)
- delivery_id (fusion.plating.delivery from logistics)
qc_check_id deferred to Task 2.7 — its target model
(fusion.plating.quality.check) still lives in
fusion_plating_bridge_mrp and we don't depend on bridge_mrp from
this module. Task 2.7 will address QC sourcing.
6 unit tests (5 field-presence + 1 integration creating linked
records).
Manifest 19.0.1.0.0 → 19.0.1.1.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Empty module that will host the native job bridge during Phase 2
of the migration. Coexists with fusion_plating_bridge_mrp during
the migration period — both can be installed simultaneously
without conflict.
Depends on:
- fusion_plating (fp.job, fp.job.step, fp.work.centre from Phase 1)
- fusion_plating_configurator (fp.part.catalog, fp.coating.config)
- fusion_plating_portal (fusion.plating.portal.job)
- fusion_plating_logistics (fusion.plating.delivery)
- fusion_plating_quality (fusion.plating.customer.spec)
- fusion_plating_certificates (fp.certificate)
These deps are why these fields couldn't live in fusion_plating
core (would invert the dep graph). All cross-module fields on
fp.job and fp.job.step land here via _inherit in subsequent tasks.
auto_install=False — opt-in only.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
