The _fp_auto_create_job grouping key was (recipe, part, coating).
Lines that shared all three but differed in thickness (or serial)
silently collapsed into one fp.job — the second line's thickness/SN
was lost, and any downstream cert printed the first line's values
across both batches. Silent mis-attestation = compliance hole.
Extended the key tuple to (recipe, part, coating, thickness, serial).
Single-line SOs and same-(thickness, SN) multi-line SOs collapse
identically to before. Only lines that previously merged when they
shouldn't have now split into their own fp.jobs.
TDD via test_so_confirm_splits_by_thickness:
- seeds the part with default_process_id so both lines hit the
`if recipe:` branch (where the bug lived — the no_recipe branch
already split correctly per line)
- confirms 2 jobs after action_confirm with each carrying its
own thickness via the linked SO line
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three coupled shop-floor corrections:
- fp.job._compute_display_name: renders "Work Order # 00011" in
form header, breadcrumbs, M2O dropdowns, and error messages.
DB name stays as WH/JOB/00011 - existing chatter/cert/delivery
references unchanged.
- fp.job.step.button_finish: refuses if qty_at_step > 0 AND a
downstream pending/ready step exists. Last runnable step is
exempt (parts complete in place). Manager bypass via
fp_skip_qty_gate=True context key.
- fp.job.step.action_complete_one_to_next: new per-row button
"Complete 1 -> Next" for streaming flow (large parts going
one-by-one). Records move(qty=1) to next step; if drain takes
qty_at_step to 0, auto-finishes source + auto-starts destination
via existing action_finish_and_advance.
- fp.job.step._fp_record_one_piece_auto_move: auto-move shim
wired into action_finish_and_advance. qty=1 + downstream =>
silently record move(1). qty>1 + downstream => raise pointing
at Complete 1 -> Next. Last step always allowed.
- 16 new TestQtyGate tests covering gate / shim / auto-finish /
last-step exemption / display rename / Move wizard zero-qty.
Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-step-qty-gate-and-display-rename-design.md
Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-12-step-qty-gate-and-display-rename.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Implements the milestone-cascade design (Phase 1) and catches the
fusion_plating_jobs / fusion_plating_certificates source up to entech.
Milestone cascade (this PR's core):
- fp.job: new computes all_steps_terminal, next_milestone_action,
next_milestone_label; dispatcher action_advance_next_milestone with
3 helpers (_action_open_draft_certs, _action_open_draft_delivery,
_action_mark_active_delivery_delivered); _resolve_required_cert_types
resolver; _fp_create_certificates rewritten to honour
part.certificate_requirement + partner flags + loop over resolved
cert types
- fp.job.workflow.state: new trigger_on_delivery_state Boolean;
_fp_is_passed_for_job extended with delivery-state branch;
Shipped state seed reroutes from default_kind=ship to the new trigger
- View: hide Finish & Next when all_steps_terminal; add 4 mutually-
exclusive milestone buttons (Mark Job Done / Issue Certs / Schedule
Delivery / Mark Shipped) bound to one dispatcher
- Cert gate (fusion_plating_certificates/models/fp_delivery.py):
action_mark_delivered hard-blocks on draft certs; manager bypass
via fp_skip_cert_gate=True context key
- 24 unit tests in test_fp_job_milestone_cascade.py covering computes,
resolver, dispatcher, cert gate
- Spec: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-12-job-milestone-cascade-design.md
- Plan: docs/superpowers/plans/2026-05-12-job-milestone-cascade.md
Other entech changes caught up in this sync (from earlier session
patches not previously committed):
- fp.job version bump series 18.x → 19.0
- res_users_views.xml addition (signature widget in user prefs)
- racking inspection smart button removal
- various view/manifest touch-ups
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
User feedback on WH/JOB/00341 (S00279 retest): clicking Start on
the Contract Review step changed state to in_progress but didn't
take them to QA-005. They had to then click Finish & Next twice
to land on the form — confusing flow.
Better UX: when an operator clicks Start on a step where
recipe_node.default_kind='contract_review', the step starts AND
the QA-005 form opens immediately. Operator signs/dismisses,
navigates back, hits Finish & Next once → step finishes + advances.
Implementation:
fp.job.step.button_start, after super() returns and the
receiving check runs, calls _fp_contract_review_redirect()
(existing helper). If it returns an action, return that
instead of the parent's result. Single-record only — bulk
button_start (job-level start-all) shouldn't navigate.
Helper logic unchanged — same gate matrix:
* recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'
* job has part_catalog_id
* review state NOT in (complete, dismissed)
When review is already complete, the gate clears: button_start
returns the normal True so the operator can advance the step
without bouncing through QA-005 again.
Tests:
test_button_start_routes_cr_step_to_qa005 — start opens QA-005
test_button_start_does_not_route_when_review_complete — start
does NOT redirect once review is signed off
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two coherent feature drops shipping together because their fp_job_step
edits overlap. Both target operator workflow correctness.
## Sub 13 — Sequential step enforcement (recipe + per-step)
Background:
Investigation on WH/JOB/00339 showed operators starting Incoming
Inspection while Contract Review was still in_progress. Audit:
98.7% of recipe operations system-wide had requires_predecessor_done
= false (the legacy per-step opt-in defaults off, recipe authors
rarely tick the box).
Architecture:
Recipe-level toggle + per-step opt-out (Option A from /investigate).
* fusion.plating.process.node.enforce_sequential — Boolean on the
recipe root. Default True. When True, every operation under this
recipe waits for earlier-sequence steps to finish before it can
start.
* fusion.plating.process.node.parallel_start — Boolean on operation
nodes. When True, this step bypasses the sequential gate (e.g.
paperwork or QA review that runs alongside production).
* Mirrored on fp.step.template (parallel_start) so library steps
carry the flag into snapshots.
* fp.job.enforce_sequential — related from recipe_id. Snapshotted
at job creation so a recipe author flipping the recipe's flag
AFTER job generation does NOT change behaviour mid-run.
* fp.job.step.parallel_start — related from recipe_node_id.
* Decision matrix (encapsulated in
fp.job.step._fp_should_block_predecessors):
recipe.enforce_sequential | step.parallel_start | step.req_pred_done | block?
--------------------------|---------------------|--------------------|------
True | False | any | YES
True | True | any | no
False | any | True | YES
False | any | False | no
* Manager bypass via context fp_skip_predecessor_check=True (existing).
Runtime gates:
* fp.job.step.button_start — calls _fp_should_block_predecessors;
raises UserError naming the blocking earlier step(s).
* fp.job.step.can_start — computed Boolean for view-side disable.
* Move wizard predecessor check
(fusion_plating_shopfloor/controllers/move_controller.py) — uses
the same helper so tablet + backend behave identically.
UI surface:
* Recipe form (fp_process_node_views.xml) — enforce_sequential
toggle on recipe root, parallel_start checkbox on operations.
* Step template form — parallel_start checkbox.
* Simple Recipe Editor (inline library form) — Parallel Start
checkbox + legacy flag demoted with muted styling + supervisor
group gate.
* Recipe Tree Editor (properties panel) — both flags exposed,
only-show on the right node_type.
* Controllers updated to allowlist + payload the new fields.
Migration:
fusion_plating/migrations/19.0.18.12.0/post-migrate.py — sets
enforce_sequential = TRUE on every existing recipe-root node.
Idempotent. User confirmed dev-stage data, so retroactive flip
is safe (no production jobs to disrupt).
Tests:
TestSequentialEnforcement (10 tests) covering:
* sequential mode blocks out-of-order start
* first step always startable
* predecessor finish/skip unlocks next
* parallel_start opts out of gate
* free-flow mode bypasses gate
* legacy requires_predecessor_done still honoured in free-flow
* manager bypass via context
* can_start compute reflects state correctly
* library template parallel_start snapshots into recipe-node
## Sub 12e — Record Inputs Wizard v3 (card layout, dark-mode aware)
Background:
v2 wizard was a 17-column wide editable table. Operators got lost
finding which value column applied to their row's type, horizontal
scroll required on tablets, composite types crammed into one row.
New layout:
* Each measurement renders as a stacked card (CSS Grid + display
transformation on the existing list widget — preserves inline
editing, no JS rewrite).
* Card header: prompt name (large, bold) + type/unit pills.
* Card body: ONLY the value widget for this row's type
(number / boolean / date / text / photo / multi-point / panel).
* Composite types (multi-point thickness 5x reading + avg, bath
panel 4 fields) get inline sub-grid inside the card.
* Empty state ("no measurement prompts") with friendly CTA.
Dark mode:
* SCSS branches at compile time on $o-webclient-color-scheme
(per fusion-plating/CLAUDE.md note).
* Tokens: 7 surface colours + 4 ink levels with light/dark hex
pairs, all behind var(--fp-*) custom properties for per-deploy
override.
* Registered in BOTH web.assets_backend AND web.assets_web_dark
so each bundle compiles its own palette.
Tablet polish:
@media (max-width: 900px) — collapse meta below prompt + bump
numeric input min-height to 56px.
Defensive:
* v2 view kept in the XML file (instant rollback by changing one
view_id ref).
* `:has(.o_invisible_modifier)` rule drops empty cells out of the
grid so Odoo's invisible="..." doesn't punch holes in layout.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two bugs fixed in one drop, both targeting the contract review (QA-005)
enforcement gap reported on entech.
## Bug 1 — WO step routed to wrong wizard
Symptom: clicking Finish & Next or Record on a Contract Review step in
WH/JOB/00339 opened the generic measurement wizard with three fake
prompts (Reviewer Initials / Date Reviewed / QA-005 Approved). No path
to the actual QA-005 form from the work order.
Root cause: action_finish_and_advance + action_open_input_wizard had no
branch for recipe_node.default_kind == 'contract_review'. The step.kind
mapping collapses contract_review -> 'other' so kind-based detection
wouldn't have worked either; gate has to live at the recipe-node layer.
Fix in fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job_step.py (v19.0.8.14.6):
- action_finish_and_advance:329 calls _fp_contract_review_redirect
before the input-wizard branch
- action_open_input_wizard:844 same gate, keeps Record button consistent
- _fp_contract_review_redirect:866 (new) returns the part's
action_start_contract_review() unless review.state in
(complete, dismissed) — gate clears so the step can finish after
the operator signs QA-005.
## Bug 2 — Part create did not enforce contract review
Symptom: spec called for a banner-only UX. User wanted true automatic
enforcement on first part creation under an enforced customer.
Fix in fusion_plating_quality/models/fp_part_catalog.py (v19.0.4.10.0):
- @api.model_create_multi def create() override
- _fp_enforce_contract_review_on_create() helper auto-stages the
fp.contract.review record AND surfaces three prominent reminders:
1. Sticky bus.bus warning toast (top-right, doesn't auto-dismiss)
2. mail.activity (To Do) on the part for the current user
3. Smart button on the part form lights up (review now exists)
- Idempotent: skips parts that already carry a review id
- Soft-fails: bus or activity outage doesn't block part creation
- create()-only — write/update flows never re-trigger
Sub 4's existing info banner stays as a fourth surface.
## Tests
- fusion_plating_jobs/tests/test_fp_job_extensions.py:
+TestContractReviewStepRouting (5 tests covering both routing methods,
the complete/dismissed gate-clear, and non-CR step regression)
- fusion_plating_quality/tests/test_part_catalog_contract_review_enforcement.py
(NEW): 9 tests covering auto-create, batch create, idempotency,
activity surface, bus surface, write-must-not-retrigger, soft-fail.
- docs/superpowers/tests/2026-04-22-sub4-smoke.py: flipped the
"no review yet" assertion to "review auto-created" to match new
behavior. Sign-flow assertions unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three connected operator-workflow features for entech.
A. fp.job smart buttons — count fields and action methods for sale
order, steps, deliveries, invoices, payments, quality holds,
certificates, time logs, and portal job. Each is an oe_stat_button
that drills into the matching records, mirroring the sale.order
pattern. Cross-module models are runtime-detected so the form
stays clean when bridge modules are uninstalled.
B. Reusable QR scanner OWL component (`<QrScanner/>`) wired into the
Manager Desk, Tablet Station, Plant Overview, and Process Tree
headers. Click → modal with rear-camera stream (getUserMedia) +
BarcodeDetector live decode → opens the matching fp.job form via
the action service. Falls back to a manual URL paste box on
browsers without BarcodeDetector. Works on iOS 17+ Safari and
Android Chrome. Width uses `min(420px, 92vw)` wrapped in #{} so
dart-sass passes it through verbatim instead of trying to compute
incompatible units at compile time.
C. /fp/tank/<id> public-but-auth-required tank status page for NFC
taps. Renders the tank's current step (in-progress / paused),
queued ready steps, and most recent bath chemistry log (lines
table) on a mobile-first page. URL-based so it works on iOS Safari
without the Web NFC API — the operator taps the NFC tag, the URL
opens in the default browser, the page auto-renders. New
web.assets_frontend bundle entry pulls in the design tokens +
tank_status.scss.
Manifest version bumps: jobs 19.0.5.0.0, shopfloor 19.0.16.0.0.
Tests: 44 pass (3 new smart-button assertions added).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Removes the parallel OWL/controller stack I built in
fusion_plating_jobs (job_process_tree, job_plant_overview,
job_manager_dashboard, job_tablet, job_*.scss, plus parallel
controllers and action XML files). Refactors the existing
fusion_plating_shopfloor components in place to bind to
fp.job / fp.job.step instead of mrp.production / mrp.workorder.
End state:
- ONE operator UI module (shopfloor) instead of two parallel ones
- Existing token system (_fp_shopfloor_tokens.scss) reused as
designed - no duplicate jobs tokens
- Existing /fp/shopfloor/* RPC URLs preserved (no integration
breakage); workorder_id kwargs accepted as legacy aliases for
step_id / job_id so older tablet clients keep working
- Existing visual designs preserved - only the data layer
underneath changed
- Process Tree button on fp.job form now points at
fusion_plating_shopfloor's fp_process_tree client action
- Bake Windows / First-Piece Gates / Bake Oven / Operator Queue
models stay where they were
- legacy_menu_hide.xml trimmed: only the bridge_mrp Production
Priorities entry remains; the 3 shopfloor menus (Manager Desk,
Plant Overview, Tablet Station) are now visible (the canonical
native consoles)
Manifests:
- fusion_plating_jobs 19.0.3.1.0 -> 19.0.4.0.0 (consolidation bump,
no more bundled JS/SCSS, only job_scan controller retained)
- fusion_plating_shopfloor 19.0.14.4.0 -> 19.0.15.0.0 (asset bundle
cache-bust + significant controller refactor)
Tests pass on entech: 0 failed, 0 errors of 41 tests.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds legacy_mrp_production_id (Integer index) on fp.job and
legacy_mrp_workorder_id on fp.job.step. Used as the idempotency
key during cutover migration.
Three scripts under fusion_plating_jobs/scripts/:
- audit_pre_migration.py — counts and data-quality concerns BEFORE
- migrate_to_fp_jobs.py — copies MO->fp.job, WO->fp.job.step, time
logs, rebinds cross-refs (batches,
holds, certs, readings, portals,
inspections, deliveries). Idempotent.
- audit_post_migration.py — counts and verifies AFTER
Migration is run manually from \`odoo shell\` at cutover (not as
auto post-migration hook, for safety). README explains usage.
Tests verify the legacy id fields exist and the migration script
files are well-formed Python.
Manifest 19.0.1.9.0 -> 19.0.2.0.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase 6 originally scoped the full operator UI rewrite (Plant
Overview, Tablet, Manager Dashboard, Process Tree). Tailscale SSH
to entech is currently unavailable, so live in-browser
verification of OWL/JS components isn't possible. Shipping a lean
Phase 6 with the data-layer pieces:
1. /fp/job/<id> scan controller — when a user scans a fp.job
sticker, lands them on the fp.job form (or the process tree
action once that's wired). Mirrors fusion_plating_reports' /fp/wo/
pattern.
2. /fp/jobs/process_tree JSON endpoint — returns the recipe tree
serialized with each node tagged by its fp.job.step state,
ready for an OWL component to render. The component itself is
deferred (see README.md).
The bigger UI deferrals (kanban, tablet, manager dashboard) are
documented in README.md. They get their own focused project after
cutover — the data layer is complete, so they can land
incrementally without touching fp.job/fp.job.step.
Tests verify controller imports + serialization shape (no HTTP
because TransactionCase doesn't easily simulate request context).
Manifest 19.0.1.8.0 → 19.0.1.9.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two parallel report definitions for the native job model:
1. Job Sticker (6x4 inch custom paperformat) bound to fp.job. Prints
WH/JOB/... ID, customer, SO, qty, due date, recipe, step
progress. QR encodes /fp/job/<id> for scan-to-job navigation.
2. Job Traveller bound to fp.job, A4 portrait. Job header + all
fp.job.step rows in sequence order with operator sign-off
column.
Coexists with fusion_plating_reports' MO/WO bindings — both print
menus stay live during migration.
Deferred reports (use existing during migration; rebind at cutover):
- BoL, Packing Slip, Invoice (read from SO, no fp.job change needed)
- WO Margin (cost rollup; rebuild against fp.job.step.cost_total
in phase-end polish)
Adds fusion_plating_reports to fusion_plating_jobs depends.
Tests deferred to post-Tailscale-restore: 3 new tests verify
report actions are registered + sticker template renders without
QWeb errors. Module file content verified locally as
well-formed XML.
Manifest 19.0.1.7.0 → 19.0.1.8.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Adds 'job_confirmed' and 'job_complete' trigger events to
fp.notification.template (legacy 'mo_confirmed' / 'mo_complete'
stay for bridge_mrp).
- fp.job.action_confirm and button_mark_done now fire those
notifications best-effort via fp.notification.template._dispatch
(silent skip if templates absent or notifications module missing).
- Adds x_fc_source ['mrp', 'jobs'] tag to fusion.plating.kpi.value
so Phase 9 dashboards can filter or display both sources.
- Verified aerospace/nuclear/cgp/safety modules don't directly
reference mrp.production or mrp.workorder.
Configurator integration was already covered by Task 2.5's SO
confirm hook (reads x_fc_part_catalog_id and x_fc_coating_config_id
from sale.order.line).
Manifest 19.0.1.6.0 -> 19.0.1.7.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds x_fc_job_id / x_fc_step_id Many2ones via _inherit on:
- fusion.plating.batch (workorder_id stays for legacy MRP-bound batches)
- fusion.plating.quality.hold
- fp.certificate
- fp.thickness.reading
- fusion.plating.delivery (parallel to existing job_ref Char)
- fp.racking.inspection (parallel to existing production_id)
fp.job.action_confirm now also calls a best-effort racking-inspection
auto-create. The current fp.racking.inspection still has a required
production_id, so the helper skips cleanly when this job has no MO link
(pure-native mode). Phase 9 cutover flips the required FK to fp.job.
Strategy: parallel coexistence — bridge_mrp's existing fields stay
populated; this adds NEW fields populated by the native flow. Phase 9
cutover stops populating the old fields.
Adds fusion_plating_batch + fusion_plating_receiving to jobs module
depends.
Note: spec referenced fp.batch / fp.quality.hold; the actual models
in this codebase are fusion.plating.batch / fusion.plating.quality.hold
— used the real model names.
Manifest 19.0.1.5.0 → 19.0.1.6.0. 29 jobs tests pass.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Task 2.6: fp.job.action_confirm auto-creates fusion.plating.portal.job
with x_fc_job_id back-reference. Idempotent (skip if already linked).
- Task 2.7: fp.job.action_confirm checks customer.x_fc_requires_qc
and best-effort creates a fusion.plating.quality.check (the model
lives in bridge_mrp; runtime-detected to avoid dep cycle).
- Task 2.8: fp.job.button_mark_done sets state='done', date_finished,
auto-creates draft fusion.plating.delivery and best-effort triggers
fp.certificate generation.
- Task 2.9: account.move.action_post links invoice -> fp.job via SO
origin lookup, updates portal_job state to complete and stamps
invoice_ref.
5 new tests cover: portal job creation + idempotency, mark_done state
+ delivery, cancel-then-mark-done blocked.
Best-effort patterns (try/except + runtime model detection) used for
QC + cert because their target models are in dependent modules
that this module doesn't depend on by design.
qc_check_id field on fp.job still deferred — adding it here would
require depending on bridge_mrp.
Manifest 19.0.1.4.0 -> 19.0.1.5.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Settings flag controls which SO confirm path runs. Default False
keeps the legacy bridge_mrp / mrp.production flow on entech.
Setting True diverts confirm into fp.job creation.
Both hooks coexist — bridge_mrp's _fp_auto_create_mo and the new
_fp_auto_create_job — but only one creates records per SO confirm
(controlled by the flag).
The new _fp_auto_create_job mirrors bridge_mrp's grouping logic
(x_fc_wo_group_tag), recipe resolution (coating → part), and
traceability fields (origin, sale_order_line_ids).
Settings UI shows the flag in a 'Fusion Plating Jobs' app section
of the standard Configuration menu.
3 new tests cover: flag off no-op, flag on creates job, idempotency.
Manifest 19.0.1.3.0 → 19.0.1.4.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Native port of fusion_plating_bridge_mrp's
_generate_workorders_from_recipe method. Walks the recipe tree,
creates one fp.job.step per 'operation' node, formats child 'step'
nodes as step instructions on chatter, respects opt-in/out
overrides from fp.job.node.override.
Adaptations from the original:
- Creates fp.job.step (not mrp.workorder)
- Maps fusion.plating.work.center to fp.work.centre via forward
link (x_fc_fp_work_centre_id) or code fallback
- Uses native field names (job_id, work_centre_id, etc.)
- Drops work_role_id (not on fp.job.step yet — Task 2.6+)
- Drops _fp_autofill_default_equipment (not yet on step)
5 new tests cover: basic generation, idempotency, no-recipe skip,
opt-in override behaviour, recipe_node_id link.
Manifest 19.0.1.2.0 → 19.0.1.3.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Mirror of fusion.plating.job.node.override from bridge_mrp, but
bound to fp.job. bridge_mrp's version stays alive for legacy MO
flow during the migration. Both coexist.
Adds override_ids One2many to fp.job via _inherit, plus
unique(job_id, node_id) constraint.
Note: spec-suggested _sql_constraints syntax is deprecated in
Odoo 19 ("Model attribute '_sql_constraints' is no longer
supported, please define model.Constraint on the model"). Used
the new class-attribute form: _unique_job_node = models.Constraint(...).
Verified the UNIQUE index is created on the table.
3 new tests: create, uniqueness, one2many backref.
Manifest 19.0.1.1.1 -> 19.0.1.2.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
5 of the 6 deferred fields from Phase 1 Task 1.4 land here in
fusion_plating_jobs:
- part_catalog_id (fp.part.catalog from configurator)
- coating_config_id (fp.coating.config from configurator)
- customer_spec_id (fusion.plating.customer.spec from quality)
- portal_job_id (fusion.plating.portal.job from portal)
- delivery_id (fusion.plating.delivery from logistics)
qc_check_id deferred to Task 2.7 — its target model
(fusion.plating.quality.check) still lives in
fusion_plating_bridge_mrp and we don't depend on bridge_mrp from
this module. Task 2.7 will address QC sourcing.
6 unit tests (5 field-presence + 1 integration creating linked
records).
Manifest 19.0.1.0.0 → 19.0.1.1.0.
Part of: native job model migration (spec 2026-04-25)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
