2d9779047b
Two compounding issues introduced by the persistence audit work:
1. fields.Text mismatch: sale.order.x_fc_internal_note and
x_fc_external_note are actually fields.Html. I declared the
sale.order.line related mirrors and the fp.job stored copies as
fields.Text, so setup_related raised:
TypeError: Type of related field
sale.order.line.x_fc_internal_note is inconsistent with
sale.order.x_fc_internal_note
Fixed by switching both Note fields on fp.job and sale.order.line
to fields.Html.
2. Module-load-order: Tier 3 fields (x_fc_delivery_method,
x_fc_ship_via, x_fc_invoice_strategy) are defined in
fusion_plating_jobs (related to sale.order via _inherit), but I
referenced them in fusion_plating core's fp_job_views.xml — which
loads BEFORE fusion_plating_jobs registers the fields. View
validator raised "Field x_fc_delivery_method does not exist".
Fixed by removing those 3 fields from the core view group and
adding them via xpath in fusion_plating_jobs's fp_job_form_inherit
(which loads after the fields are registered).
Both fixes deployed and verified — registry loads in 2s, all field
types match, related path resolves correctly. No data loss; the
fp.job rows that already had stored Text content for internal_note /
external_note will carry over into the Html field intact.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
fusion_plating_jobs
Native plating job bridge — wires fp.job and fp.job.step (defined in
fusion_plating core, Phase 1 of the migration spec dated 2026-04-25)
into the rest of the Fusion Plating module family: configurator, portal,
logistics, quality, certificates, batches, KPI, notifications, reports.
Coexists with fusion_plating_bridge_mrp during the migration period.
The x_fc_use_native_jobs settings flag (default: False) toggles the
behaviour. When False, SO confirm continues to create mrp.production
records through bridge_mrp. When True, SO confirm creates fp.job
records here.
See docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-25-fp-native-job-model-design.md
for full design rationale and §6 of the implementation plan for phase
breakdown.
Phase 6 — deferred items
Phase 6 originally scoped the full operator UI rewrite. With Tailscale SSH to entech currently unavailable we cannot live-test OWL/JS in the browser, so Phase 6 ships a lean version: the data-layer endpoints land now, the rendering UI lands later.
Deferred to post-cutover hardening:
- Plant Overview kanban over
fp.job.step— replacesfusion_plating_shopfloor'smrp.workorderkanban. - Tablet Station UI rewrite over
fp.job/fp.job.step. - Manager Dashboard rewrite.
- Process Tree OWL component — currently a stub:
/fp/jobs/process_treereturns the serialized recipe tree as JSON, but the OWL component to render it is not built.
Rationale: these are large OWL/JS components that need live in-browser
verification on entech. Under the migration's parallel-coexistence
strategy, operators continue using the existing shopfloor UI (bound to
mrp.workorder) until cutover. After cutover, the operator UI rewrite
becomes its own focused project — the data layer (fp.job,
fp.job.step, time logs, timestamps) is fully in place from
Phase 1–5.
Phase 6 — what shipped
/fp/job/<id>— scan-redirect controller. The fp.job sticker QR encodes this URL. Routes managers to thefp.jobform; routes operators to the same form for now (will swap to the process tree client action once the OWL component lands)./fp/jobs/process_tree— JSON-RPC endpoint that returns the recipe tree for a job, with each node tagged by its matchingfp.job.stepstate, ready for an OWL component to consume.