Files
Odoo-Modules/fusion_plating/fusion_plating_jobs
gsinghpal 328599d539 fix(jobs): v3 wizard — chrome on <td>, verified from Odoo source (16.3)
I was wrong about the DOM. Verified from Odoo 19 source on entech:

  web/static/src/views/fields/float/float_field.xml
  web/static/src/views/fields/char/char_field.xml
  web/static/src/views/list/list_renderer.xml

Float/Char fields render as a BARE <span> (read mode) or BARE
<input class="o_input"> (edit mode) directly inside the <td>.
There is NO .o_field_widget wrapper. So all my prior CSS targeting
.o_field_widget matched nothing.

Also discovered: Odoo's getCellClass() in list_renderer.js calls
canUseFormatter() which strips custom <field> classes when the
column has widget="..." set:

    canUseFormatter(column, record) {
        if (column.widget) {
            return false;   // ← class stripped here
        }
        ...
    }

So o_fp_iw_value class doesn't even land on cells with
widget="boolean_toggle"/"image". Those cells render natively;
boolean toggle and image styling now targets the widgets directly
wherever they appear (.o_boolean_toggle, .o_field_image).

Fix: put visible chrome (border, bg, padding, min-height) on the
<td> itself for prompt/meta/value/extras cells. Make inner span
and input transparent + inherit. Focus ring travels up via
:focus-within on the td.

Cells now look like obvious input boxes from first paint, regardless
of whether the user has clicked into edit mode.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-03 22:06:53 -04:00
..
2026-04-26 10:46:44 -04:00
2026-04-26 10:46:44 -04:00
2026-04-27 00:11:18 -04:00
2026-04-26 15:05:17 -04:00
2026-04-29 03:35:33 -04:00
2026-04-28 19:39:37 -04:00
2026-04-30 00:21:08 -04:00
2026-04-28 19:39:37 -04:00

fusion_plating_jobs

Native plating job bridge — wires fp.job and fp.job.step (defined in fusion_plating core, Phase 1 of the migration spec dated 2026-04-25) into the rest of the Fusion Plating module family: configurator, portal, logistics, quality, certificates, batches, KPI, notifications, reports.

Coexists with fusion_plating_bridge_mrp during the migration period. The x_fc_use_native_jobs settings flag (default: False) toggles the behaviour. When False, SO confirm continues to create mrp.production records through bridge_mrp. When True, SO confirm creates fp.job records here.

See docs/superpowers/specs/2026-04-25-fp-native-job-model-design.md for full design rationale and §6 of the implementation plan for phase breakdown.

Phase 6 — deferred items

Phase 6 originally scoped the full operator UI rewrite. With Tailscale SSH to entech currently unavailable we cannot live-test OWL/JS in the browser, so Phase 6 ships a lean version: the data-layer endpoints land now, the rendering UI lands later.

Deferred to post-cutover hardening:

  • Plant Overview kanban over fp.job.step — replaces fusion_plating_shopfloor's mrp.workorder kanban.
  • Tablet Station UI rewrite over fp.job / fp.job.step.
  • Manager Dashboard rewrite.
  • Process Tree OWL component — currently a stub: /fp/jobs/process_tree returns the serialized recipe tree as JSON, but the OWL component to render it is not built.

Rationale: these are large OWL/JS components that need live in-browser verification on entech. Under the migration's parallel-coexistence strategy, operators continue using the existing shopfloor UI (bound to mrp.workorder) until cutover. After cutover, the operator UI rewrite becomes its own focused project — the data layer (fp.job, fp.job.step, time logs, timestamps) is fully in place from Phase 15.

Phase 6 — what shipped

  • /fp/job/<id> — scan-redirect controller. The fp.job sticker QR encodes this URL. Routes managers to the fp.job form; routes operators to the same form for now (will swap to the process tree client action once the OWL component lands).
  • /fp/jobs/process_tree — JSON-RPC endpoint that returns the recipe tree for a job, with each node tagged by its matching fp.job.step state, ready for an OWL component to consume.