User asked why the direct-order wizard only showed "Primary
Treatment" and not Process — aren't they the same? They're not,
but the distinction was invisible on the order line until now.
Mental model (preserved here to keep future decisions aligned with
the user's question):
* Primary Treatment (fp.coating.config) = "WHAT coating" (process
type, thickness range, spec reference — the contractual
deliverable).
* Process (fusion.plating.process.node tree) = "HOW we make it"
(the floor-level sequence of operations and steps that WO
generation turns into work).
Each coating carries a default process (recipe_id). Parts can
override that via the Process Composer, storing a part-scoped
clone (default_process_id on fp.part.catalog). Resolution:
part's composed process wins; coating default is the fallback.
Added a computed read-only `effective_process_id` field on
fp.direct.order.line that displays exactly what process will drive
WO generation for the line, plus a one-line `effective_process_source`
showing whether it came from the part ("customised") or the
coating ("default"). Both surfaced on the wizard list and form so
the estimator can verify before confirming the order.
No behaviour change — this is pure visibility. WO generation still
uses the same resolution chain it did before.
fusion_plating_configurator → 19.0.13.2.0
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
381a750902
