**7a. NCR close gate** (fusion.plating.ncr.action_close) Block close unless these are filled in: • Description (what happened) • Containment Actions (immediate response) • Root Cause (why it happened) • Disposition (use-as-is / rework / scrap / RTV decision) A closed NCR without these is useless for AS9100 audits — it's the entire point of an NCR to document what went wrong, why, and how we responded. Empty-HTML strings like "<p><br></p>" are detected as empty too. **7b. CAPA close gate** (fusion.plating.capa.action_close) Block close unless: • Root Cause Analysis filled in • Action Plan filled in • Verification (date + verifier) recorded • Effectiveness Notes filled when CAPA was marked Not Effective AS9100 §10.2 / Nadcap require evidence of root-cause analysis, the corrective/preventive action plan, AND that effectiveness was verified before the loop is closed. **8. Invoice ref defensive default** (account.move.create) Auto-fills `ref` from the source SO's client_order_ref or x_fc_po_number when the invoice is created with invoice_origin set but no ref. Already populated on the SO confirm path; this catches manually-created invoices that would otherwise miss it. Customer AP teams reject invoices that don't quote their PO# back. **9. Discharge sample close gate** (fusion.plating.discharge.sample.action_close) Block close unless: • Lab Report # set • Results Received Date set • At least one parameter reading on file • Lab certificate/report attached Without lab evidence the record fails any environmental compliance audit — the whole point is to document the test was performed and what the lab said. **Simulator** (scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py) Adds 4 new negative tests (Test 8-11), all wrapped in savepoints: ✓ Test 8 : NCR close without RC/containment/disposition → blocked ✓ Test 9 : CAPA close without analysis/plan/verification → blocked ✓ Test 10: Discharge sample close without lab evidence → blocked ✓ Test 11: Invoice ref auto-fills from SO.client_order_ref → asserted **Final E2E**: 52 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL out of 54 checks. Both remaining WARNs are expected (bake-window auto-create, first-piece gate — coating-driven, this coating doesn't trigger them). 11 negative tests in total now, every gate fires when triggered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
99 lines
3.5 KiB
Python
99 lines
3.5 KiB
Python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
# Copyright 2026 Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
# License OPL-1 (Odoo Proprietary License v1.0)
|
|
# Part of the Fusion Plating product family.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
'name': 'Fusion Plating — Quality (QMS)',
|
|
'version': '19.0.1.2.0',
|
|
'category': 'Manufacturing/Plating',
|
|
'summary': 'Native QMS for plating shops: NCR, CAPA, calibration, AVL, FAIR, '
|
|
'internal audits, customer specs, document control. CE + EE compatible.',
|
|
'description': """
|
|
Fusion Plating — Quality (QMS)
|
|
==============================
|
|
|
|
Part of the Fusion Plating product family by Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
|
|
A complete, native Quality Management System layer for the Fusion Plating
|
|
core. Built to satisfy the paperwork side of running a plating / metal
|
|
finishing shop without forcing customers onto Odoo Enterprise or paid
|
|
add-ons.
|
|
|
|
This module is intentionally Community Edition compatible. It does NOT
|
|
depend on `quality`, `quality_control`, `documents`, or `sign`. Everything
|
|
is built natively on `mail.thread`, `mail.activity.mixin`, and standard
|
|
Odoo records.
|
|
|
|
Records included
|
|
----------------
|
|
* Non-Conformance Reports (NCR) — containment, disposition, MRB workflow
|
|
* Corrective & Preventive Actions (CAPA) — root cause, action plan,
|
|
effectiveness verification, NCR linkage
|
|
* Calibration Equipment register + individual calibration events with
|
|
pass / limited / fail and impact assessment
|
|
* Approved Vendor List (AVL) — supplier approval state, expiry,
|
|
scorecard rating
|
|
* Customer Specification library — industry, customer, and internal
|
|
specs (e.g. AMS 2404, ASTM B733, MIL-C-26074)
|
|
* Internal Audits — internal, customer, certification, supplier scope
|
|
* First Article Inspection Reports (FAIR) — per part / revision / customer
|
|
* Document Control — procedures, work instructions, forms, standards,
|
|
manuals with revision tracking and trained-user lists
|
|
|
|
Integration
|
|
-----------
|
|
* Reuses the core res.groups.privilege ACLs from fusion_plating
|
|
(operator, supervisor, manager, admin) — no new groups to manage
|
|
* Linked to facilities, baths, and process types from core
|
|
* Chatter on every record for full audit trail
|
|
* Sequence-numbered references for NCR, CAPA, FAIR, audits
|
|
|
|
Theme aware
|
|
-----------
|
|
SCSS uses Bootstrap CSS variables and color-mix() so cards, badges, and
|
|
overdue indicators render correctly in both light and dark mode without
|
|
any media-query overrides.
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Nexa Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
""",
|
|
'author': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'website': 'https://www.nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'maintainer': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'support': 'support@nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'license': 'OPL-1',
|
|
'price': 0.00,
|
|
'currency': 'CAD',
|
|
'depends': [
|
|
'fusion_plating',
|
|
'mail',
|
|
],
|
|
'data': [
|
|
'security/fp_quality_security.xml',
|
|
'security/ir.model.access.csv',
|
|
'data/fp_sequence_data.xml',
|
|
'data/fp_quality_hold_sequence_data.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_quality_hold_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_ncr_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_capa_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_calibration_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_avl_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_customer_spec_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_audit_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_fair_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_doc_control_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_menu.xml',
|
|
],
|
|
'demo': [
|
|
'data/fp_demo_quality_data.xml',
|
|
],
|
|
'assets': {
|
|
'web.assets_backend': [
|
|
'fusion_plating_quality/static/src/scss/fusion_plating_quality.scss',
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
'installable': True,
|
|
'application': False,
|
|
'auto_install': False,
|
|
}
|