db8b79d22e
Following the workforce-E2E + required-fields audit, ship the first 6 high-priority gates so critical workflow + compliance fields can no longer be left empty by accident. **1. Invoice payment terms (account.move)** - create() now auto-inherits `invoice_payment_term_id` from partner.property_payment_term_id when missing - action_post() raises UserError if still missing — accountant must pick one before posting (prevents silent "immediate" due-date) **2. MO facility (mrp.production)** - action_confirm() auto-derives `x_fc_facility_id` if unset, in order: SO override → res.company.x_fc_default_facility_id → first active facility — then HARD GATES: raises UserError if still empty. Without facility every downstream record (WO, batch, bath log, cert) is missing the "where" half of the audit trail. **3. WO facility (mrp.workorder)** - Switched `x_fc_facility_id` from related (workcenter only) to a proper compute that falls back to production_id.x_fc_facility_id. Stub workcenters auto-created from process node names usually have no facility — the MO always does (from #2 above). **4. Thickness reading calibration_std (fp.thickness.reading)** - `calibration_std_ref` is now `required=True` with sensible default ("NiP/Al STD SET SN 100174568"). Nadcap mandates which calibration standard the gauge was checked against — without it the cert data has no chain back to a metrology record. **5. Delivery POD gate (fusion.plating.delivery)** - action_mark_delivered() raises UserError if no `pod_id`. Driver must capture POD on the iPad (recipient signature + photos + notes) BEFORE marking delivered. Without POD there's no signed receipt to back the invoice or defend a delivery dispute. **6. Certificate spec_reference gate (fp.certificate)** - action_issue() raises UserError if no `spec_reference`. The cert ATTESTS to a spec — leaving it blank produces a piece of paper that AS9100 / Nadcap auditors will (rightfully) reject. **Simulator updated**: scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py - Sets net-30 on the test customer + ensures a default facility - New PHASE 4c: 5 negative tests (one per new gate), each wrapped in a SAVEPOINT so SQL constraint violations don't abort the txn - Driver now creates POD on iPad BEFORE marking delivered **Final E2E**: 48 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL out of 50 checks. The 2 remaining WARNs (bake-window auto-create, first-piece gate) are expected behaviour — both are coating-driven and the test coating intentionally doesn't trigger them. All 7 negative tests now pass: ✓ Test 1: WO start without operator → blocked ✓ Test 2: WO start on wet WO without bath/tank → blocked ✓ Test 3: MO confirm without facility → blocked ✓ Test 4: Cert issue without spec_reference → blocked ✓ Test 5: Delivery delivered without POD → blocked ✓ Test 6: Invoice post without payment terms → blocked ✓ Test 7: Thickness reading without cal std → blocked (DB NOT NULL) Audit script (scripts/fp_required_fields_audit.py) committed too — it's the diagnostic that surfaced these gaps and can be re-run to catch new ones. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
76 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
76 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
# Copyright 2026 Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
# License OPL-1 (Odoo Proprietary License v1.0)
|
|
# Part of the Fusion Plating product family.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Fusion Plating — MRP Bridge",
|
|
'version': '19.0.6.5.0',
|
|
'category': 'Manufacturing/Plating',
|
|
'summary': 'Bridge Fusion Plating facilities, baths and tanks to Odoo MRP work orders.',
|
|
'description': """
|
|
Fusion Plating — MRP Bridge
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Part of the Fusion Plating product family by Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
|
|
Links Fusion Plating infrastructure (facilities, work centres, baths, tanks)
|
|
to Odoo's native MRP manufacturing orders and work orders so shops can:
|
|
|
|
* Assign a plating facility and FP work centre to an MRP work centre.
|
|
* Tag each work order with the specific bath, tank, rack/fixture, target
|
|
thickness, and dwell time for traceability.
|
|
* Attach a customer specification and facility to a manufacturing order.
|
|
* Create an MRP work centre directly from a Fusion Plating work centre.
|
|
* Link a portal job to a manufacturing order for customer visibility.
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Nexa Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
""",
|
|
'author': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'website': 'https://www.nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'maintainer': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'support': 'support@nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'license': 'OPL-1',
|
|
'price': 0.00,
|
|
'currency': 'CAD',
|
|
'depends': [
|
|
'fusion_plating',
|
|
'fusion_plating_portal',
|
|
'fusion_plating_quality',
|
|
'fusion_plating_logistics',
|
|
'fusion_plating_batch',
|
|
'fusion_plating_shopfloor',
|
|
'fusion_plating_configurator',
|
|
'hr',
|
|
# hr_attendance gives us the standard hr.attendance model
|
|
# (check_in / check_out). fusion_clock builds on the same model
|
|
# so this works whether the shop runs vanilla attendance or the
|
|
# full Fusion Clock T&A. Bringing the dep into the bridge keeps
|
|
# the Manager Desk's "show only clocked-in workers" filter
|
|
# working out of the box.
|
|
'hr_attendance',
|
|
'mrp',
|
|
'mrp_workorder',
|
|
'mrp_account',
|
|
'sale_mrp',
|
|
'account',
|
|
],
|
|
'data': [
|
|
'security/ir.model.access.csv',
|
|
'data/fp_work_role_data.xml',
|
|
'wizard/fp_recipe_config_wizard_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_workcenter_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_workorder_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_production_views.xml',
|
|
'views/sale_order_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_quality_hold_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_batch_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_workorder_priority_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_job_consumption_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_work_role_views.xml',
|
|
],
|
|
'installable': True,
|
|
'application': False,
|
|
'auto_install': False,
|
|
}
|