bbbd222b89
Built a comprehensive simulator (scripts/fp_e2e_workforce.py) that
role-plays 10 employees driving an order quote → invoice using real
operator timers (button_start / button_finish with elapsed time.sleep).
Initial run: 31 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL exposed two gaps that would
hurt a real shop:
**Gap 1 — Thickness readings never reached the CoC**
The Fischerscope readings inspectors take during post-plate inspection
had no path to the CoC. The cert came out empty, useless for AS9100
or aerospace audits.
Fixes:
- New tablet endpoint `/fp/shopfloor/log_thickness_reading` so the
inspector can record one reading at a time during the inspection WO
(auto-numbers, defaults the operator, supports microscope image).
- mrp_production._fp_mark_done_post_actions now bulk-links any
orphan thickness readings (those with production_id=mo.id but no
certificate_id) to the freshly-created CoC. So inspectors can log
during inspection AND the cert PDF picks them up automatically.
**Gap 2 — Operator queue leaked other people's work + simulator missed it**
fusion.plating.operator.queue.build_for_user pulled EVERY ready /
in-progress WO regardless of assignment. Tom would see John's masking
WO in his "Up Next" list — bad for aerospace traceability where you
want strict per-operator accountability.
Fix: build_for_user now filters MRP WOs by
`(x_fc_assigned_user_id == user_id OR x_fc_assigned_user_id == False)`.
Operators see their own assigned tasks first, plus any unassigned
tasks anyone can grab. Other operators' assigned WOs no longer leak
through.
Also caught: simulator was using wrong field name on the queue model.
Fixed and added a "queue isolation" check that verifies no operator
sees another operator's assigned WOs.
After fixes: **39 PASS / 2 WARN / 0 FAIL** (out of 41 checks).
Remaining WARNs are both expected behaviour:
- bake-window auto-create: this coating doesn't require_bake_relief
(the recipe has an inline Oven step instead)
- first-piece gate: same — coating-driven, only fires when needed
Areas validated end-to-end:
- quote → SO with PO# carried into client_order_ref
- SO confirm → MO + portal job auto-created
- receiving qty prefill + accept
- 9 WOs generated from recipe + assigned to specific operators
- All 9 WOs ran with real elapsed timers + 17 productivity records
across 4 distinct operators
- MO done triggers CoC auto-issue with 5 thickness readings linked,
319 KB rich PDF, customer-slug filename
- Delivery auto-created with prefilled date + driver + CoC link
- Delivery delivered, 2 chain-of-custody entries
- Invoice posted (NOT auto-paid)
- All 5 customer notifications fired (so_confirmed +
parts_received + mo_complete + shipped + invoice_posted) with
correct attachments
- Portal job → complete, SO workflow_stage → invoicing
- Chemistry log persisted, operator proficiency tracked
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
76 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
76 lines
2.7 KiB
Python
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
|
|
# Copyright 2026 Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
# License OPL-1 (Odoo Proprietary License v1.0)
|
|
# Part of the Fusion Plating product family.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"name": "Fusion Plating — MRP Bridge",
|
|
'version': '19.0.6.3.0',
|
|
'category': 'Manufacturing/Plating',
|
|
'summary': 'Bridge Fusion Plating facilities, baths and tanks to Odoo MRP work orders.',
|
|
'description': """
|
|
Fusion Plating — MRP Bridge
|
|
============================
|
|
|
|
Part of the Fusion Plating product family by Nexa Systems Inc.
|
|
|
|
Links Fusion Plating infrastructure (facilities, work centres, baths, tanks)
|
|
to Odoo's native MRP manufacturing orders and work orders so shops can:
|
|
|
|
* Assign a plating facility and FP work centre to an MRP work centre.
|
|
* Tag each work order with the specific bath, tank, rack/fixture, target
|
|
thickness, and dwell time for traceability.
|
|
* Attach a customer specification and facility to a manufacturing order.
|
|
* Create an MRP work centre directly from a Fusion Plating work centre.
|
|
* Link a portal job to a manufacturing order for customer visibility.
|
|
|
|
Copyright (c) 2026 Nexa Systems Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
""",
|
|
'author': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'website': 'https://www.nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'maintainer': 'Nexa Systems Inc.',
|
|
'support': 'support@nexasystems.ca',
|
|
'license': 'OPL-1',
|
|
'price': 0.00,
|
|
'currency': 'CAD',
|
|
'depends': [
|
|
'fusion_plating',
|
|
'fusion_plating_portal',
|
|
'fusion_plating_quality',
|
|
'fusion_plating_logistics',
|
|
'fusion_plating_batch',
|
|
'fusion_plating_shopfloor',
|
|
'fusion_plating_configurator',
|
|
'hr',
|
|
# hr_attendance gives us the standard hr.attendance model
|
|
# (check_in / check_out). fusion_clock builds on the same model
|
|
# so this works whether the shop runs vanilla attendance or the
|
|
# full Fusion Clock T&A. Bringing the dep into the bridge keeps
|
|
# the Manager Desk's "show only clocked-in workers" filter
|
|
# working out of the box.
|
|
'hr_attendance',
|
|
'mrp',
|
|
'mrp_workorder',
|
|
'mrp_account',
|
|
'sale_mrp',
|
|
'account',
|
|
],
|
|
'data': [
|
|
'security/ir.model.access.csv',
|
|
'data/fp_work_role_data.xml',
|
|
'wizard/fp_recipe_config_wizard_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_workcenter_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_workorder_views.xml',
|
|
'views/mrp_production_views.xml',
|
|
'views/sale_order_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_quality_hold_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_batch_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_workorder_priority_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_job_consumption_views.xml',
|
|
'views/fp_work_role_views.xml',
|
|
],
|
|
'installable': True,
|
|
'application': False,
|
|
'auto_install': False,
|
|
}
|