feat(plating-views): Layer 3 — field/button gates per role

Phase D Task D5 of permissions overhaul. Adds explicit groups= to
form-level elements so non-matching roles don't even SEE the buttons
they can't use:

- SO Confirm button → group_fp_sales_manager (Sales Rep sees the SO
  in draft but no Confirm button — matches model-level gate from Phase G)
- SO pricing fields (price_unit/subtotal/total/untaxed/tax) →
  group_fp_sales_rep (Technician/Shop Manager don't see pricing if
  they navigate to an SO)
- Partner Account Hold tab → group_fp_manager (was the fold-in
  group_fp_accounting; the audit-finding-11 _administrator typo lives
  in res_partner.py and is Phase G's fix)
- CAPA Close + all state-transition buttons → group_fp_quality_manager;
  edit fields use readonly="not user_has_groups(...)" so Manager
  retains read+comment per spec section 2.C
- Audit Start/Findings/Close buttons → group_fp_quality_manager
- AVL Approve/Suspend/Reinstate/Remove → group_fp_quality_manager
  (model uses Suspend+Remove instead of spec's literal 'Disqualify';
  both surfaces gated, semantics match)
- Customer Spec edit fields → readonly for non-QM (Manager keeps
  read access per spec; only inputs lock)
- FAIR Approve/Reject buttons → group_fp_quality_manager (Submit-
  for-Review and Reset stay open to whoever created the FAIR)
- Certificate Issue button — Strategy B chosen: single button hidden
  when cert_type=nadcap_cert AND user is not QM. Cleaner than splitting
  into two buttons; no separate action_sign exists on fp.certificate
  (Issue is the sign+publish action). FAIR lives in its own model;
  fp.certificate only has nadcap_cert as a special type. The ir.rule
  from Phase C enforces model-level writes independently.
- CGP form buttons (7 view files: ai, controlled_good, psa,
  receipt_shipment, registration, security_incident, visitor) →
  group_fp_quality_manager on every action button

Defense in depth: ir.rules and ACLs (from Phases B + C) already
restrict model access. These view gates are the UI layer that
matches.

Concerns:
- Spec line 192 names 'sale.order view — x_fc_account_hold_override'
  but no such field exists in the codebase. Closest practical match
  was the partner-side Account Hold management tab, which already had
  a group= attribute. Re-gated there; no SO-side field to gate.
- AVL model has no action_disqualify per spec; uses suspend+remove.
  Both gated to QM.
- fp.certificate has no action_sign (only action_issue). FAIR's
  approve/reject covers the FAIR side; nadcap-cert Issue covers the
  cert side via Strategy B.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

fusion_plating/fusion_plating_invoicing/__manifest__.py

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
 
 {
     'name': 'Fusion Plating — Invoicing',
-    'version': '19.0.3.6.1',
+    'version': '19.0.3.6.2',
     'category': 'Manufacturing/Plating',
     'summary': 'Invoice strategy engine with deposit, progress billing, net terms, COD/prepay, and account holds.',
     'description': """

fusion_plating/fusion_plating_invoicing/views/res_partner_views.xml

@@ -53,8 +53,16 @@
                     </group>
                 </page>
 
+                <!-- Phase D5 — Account Hold management (the override gate per
+                     spec section 2.E Layer 3). Was previously gated on the
+                     fold-in group_fp_accounting; consolidated to group_fp_manager
+                     and resolves audit-finding-11 _administrator typo by removing
+                     the old fold-in group from this surface. The Python helper
+                     _fp_user_can_override_account_hold (still in res_partner.py)
+                     is the runtime gate; Phase G fixes the Python-side typo
+                     separately. -->
                 <page string="Account Hold" name="account_hold_tab"
-                      groups="fusion_plating_invoicing.group_fp_accounting">
+                      groups="fusion_plating.group_fp_manager">
                     <group>
                         <group>
                             <field name="x_fc_account_hold"/>