269f9984ef
Phase D Task D5 of permissions overhaul. Adds explicit groups= to form-level elements so non-matching roles don't even SEE the buttons they can't use: - SO Confirm button → group_fp_sales_manager (Sales Rep sees the SO in draft but no Confirm button — matches model-level gate from Phase G) - SO pricing fields (price_unit/subtotal/total/untaxed/tax) → group_fp_sales_rep (Technician/Shop Manager don't see pricing if they navigate to an SO) - Partner Account Hold tab → group_fp_manager (was the fold-in group_fp_accounting; the audit-finding-11 _administrator typo lives in res_partner.py and is Phase G's fix) - CAPA Close + all state-transition buttons → group_fp_quality_manager; edit fields use readonly="not user_has_groups(...)" so Manager retains read+comment per spec section 2.C - Audit Start/Findings/Close buttons → group_fp_quality_manager - AVL Approve/Suspend/Reinstate/Remove → group_fp_quality_manager (model uses Suspend+Remove instead of spec's literal 'Disqualify'; both surfaces gated, semantics match) - Customer Spec edit fields → readonly for non-QM (Manager keeps read access per spec; only inputs lock) - FAIR Approve/Reject buttons → group_fp_quality_manager (Submit- for-Review and Reset stay open to whoever created the FAIR) - Certificate Issue button — Strategy B chosen: single button hidden when cert_type=nadcap_cert AND user is not QM. Cleaner than splitting into two buttons; no separate action_sign exists on fp.certificate (Issue is the sign+publish action). FAIR lives in its own model; fp.certificate only has nadcap_cert as a special type. The ir.rule from Phase C enforces model-level writes independently. - CGP form buttons (7 view files: ai, controlled_good, psa, receipt_shipment, registration, security_incident, visitor) → group_fp_quality_manager on every action button Defense in depth: ir.rules and ACLs (from Phases B + C) already restrict model access. These view gates are the UI layer that matches. Concerns: - Spec line 192 names 'sale.order view — x_fc_account_hold_override' but no such field exists in the codebase. Closest practical match was the partner-side Account Hold management tab, which already had a group= attribute. Re-gated there; no SO-side field to gate. - AVL model has no action_disqualify per spec; uses suspend+remove. Both gated to QM. - fp.certificate has no action_sign (only action_issue). FAIR's approve/reject covers the FAIR side; nadcap-cert Issue covers the cert side via Strategy B. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>