32d48ea44d
User feedback: operators kept asking why their work order said "Step 10"
for the first row. The 10-spacing was originally there to allow midpoint
inserts (insert sequence 15 between 10 and 20 without renumbering).
Tradeoff is operator confusion, and recipe authors rarely insert in the
middle anyway. Switching to 1-based contiguous sequences.
Files changed (every step-sequence allocation in the codebase):
fusion_plating_jobs/models/fp_job.py
_generate_steps_from_recipe — seq_counter starts at 1, increments by 1.
This is the path that builds fp.job.step records, so new jobs now show
Step 1, 2, 3, ... in the work order.
fusion_plating_bridge_mrp/models/mrp_production.py
Same change for the legacy MRP bridge so customers still on
mrp.production also get 1-based numbering.
fusion_plating/controllers/recipe_controller.py
- create_node: max_seq + 1
- reorder_nodes: idx + 1
- swap renumber: i (was i * 10)
- paste-import renumber: i (was i * 10)
- move_node: max_seq + 1
- _copy_subtree (recipe duplicate/import): i (was i * 10)
fusion_plating/controllers/simple_recipe_controller.py
- _sequence_for_position rewritten — always renumbers siblings to
keep them contiguous. Returns pos + 1 for the inserted node.
Old code used midpoint-with-fallback-to-renumber (10/20/30 spacing).
- step_reorder: i (was i * 10)
- library_input_add + step_add_input: existing_max + 1
What this DOESN'T do
Existing fp.job.step records keep their old sequences (10, 20, ...).
Re-confirm the SO to spawn a fresh job if you want the clean 1-based
numbering on a current test job. No data migration — we're in dev
and the user explicitly said test data is disposable.
What this DOES do
Every NEW job created from this commit forward shows Step 1, 2, 3, ...
Every NEW recipe step inserted via the simple editor / tree editor
also gets sequence 1, 2, 3, ...
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>